Search results

Yeah...suddenly nationalists are not concerned..

Some people are not hosting may be because they think "The people who have come to power by the kick of fate may give in our hands the Tricolor but it never be respected and owned by Hindus.The word three is in itself an evil, and a flag having three colours will certainly produce a very bad...

U moron, Do u know when RSS started hosting flag?

Do u buy old fat TV paying double the money? 2012 also another deal was signed with similar price 850M$ for 59 pieces. U mean government had to pay double that time also?

Read first then comment. First deal was at 2008 and next was at 2012.

It was in 2012 another deal was singed when putin visited India.

Agreeing for terms & condition of bidding and then finding fault. If rules were made liberal after the bidding process probably there could be some one else who would have won initial bidding process

R u serious or did i say anything wrong?

French was bidder and accepted bid. India should have sued them or continued with second winner. Instead after Indian government officially cancelled bid now frenchs coming with new points.

Modi government doesnt announce terms and condition clearly. Probably this deal is now continuing only one sided with agreeing all terms and conditions from French. Here is the deal of Russian Mi-17V5 Why is Modi government paying more than UPA for Mi-17 V5 helicopters?

Indian and Russian currency both lost value. For India its double loss and for Russia its double profit. Also i see previous government at later stage ordered additional 59 with almost same price then how could new government pay double? I smell some corruption here.

@The_Showstopper @Iggy

http://in.rbth.com/economics/2014/10/ @07/indian_pm_president_to_use_modified_mi-17_v5_helicopters_38849.html Here is the UPA deal for the same chopper: India ordered 80 Mi-17 V5 helicopters from Russia in 2008 for about $1.2 billion, which were expected to be delivered by the end of 2014. A...

BJP have to make their masters happy

Yes, I know. same way not every mosque unwelcome Hindus. Actually i dont mind if temple doesnt allow muslims because they have their own restrictions like meat eating, they have their own definition of cleanliness. In the same way for muslims. There are times when muslims them selves can not...

Yes 2002 is lesson for muslims. I definitely agree. Muslims shouldn't have burnt that even though it was Goondas who were going to disputed land dis respecting court order to maintain status quo. It exposed real face of sanghis too. (Raping and burning, which normally terrorists wouldn't do it)...

I guess Indians will be more happy about take home. But I know gov won't do away with it. BTW reservation will vanish automatically if social justice is ensured.

Better to abolish pension scheme itself....for all. Pay more during they serve instead of paying after service ends. Problem with army men is they serve less no of year compared to other department as i know OROP is congress lesson to people and BJP. If it was possible they would have implemented

OROP is really not a good thing if u consider national interest. Thats why previous government not implemented it. But BJP politicized it and now they have to bear. For Modi his image is most important thing. I guess he would come with a deal where pension would increase but not the exact OROP...

yes, Agree that its not legal but many indian temple doesnt allow, though case of dalits not allowed to enter temple is reducing it issue still there. Just google u can find many incidents. Frend, Who cares if Modi wears scull cap or not? For muslims it doesnt even matter and that doesnt even...