Search results

I'm not going to explain geostrategy to you. If you can't understand it.. Syria and I'd say Iran has a relationship with Russia based around money, oil. India's relationship is technology for money. None of them are much use to Russia from a geostrategy pov. India is of no strategic value (i...

you've suddenly started picking on russia, "neutralcitizen". any reason for the recent animosity? strange for someone so neutral :D

lol.. just accept it. The partnership is good for Pakistan, not good for India. India would prefer to see Pakistan isolated so it's not good for India. If Inida was in Pakistan's position and Russia announced the same, it would be good for India. Why the denial?

How is India responsible for the Malacca Strait? Indonesia, Malaysia, singapore patrol it. Even if it was responsible, which it isn't, the Malacca Strait is not important as an energy trade route. Oil tankers cannot pass through it. What's so strategically useful about the IOR? It is...

Surely you joke? It makes no difference whether India is in SCO or not. India is a low to mid level tech country that only has a relatively large trading base. It has no strategic value at all. If India does not join it will be the odd man of Asia. If it does, it will upset the...

not getting yor point at all. pakistan has made a lot of hints towards china and russia recently so it's more like america is losing that influence. iran it hasnt got any (though iran is an odd beneficiary of all the wars). Afghanistan noone controls. However Pakistan has influence in...

they have india. but it isn't useful enough to have bases in.

^^^^yes indeed :cheesy:. a 16 year old is a fearsome target.

that's going to stay the same in the future i'm sure. :cheesy:

i doubt he was playing to the gallery. pakistan is more valuable geostrategically than india. this is much more important.

when afghanistan and pakistan join sco, the great game will be over. it's possible all the dithering between trying to remain neutral or one nation siding with russia, the other with the americans is what caused the mess that is southwest asia in the first place. if sco was formed 100...

if it were Hindus that carried it out, would some of the indians on here change their song? I think yes

they're fighting war since the birth of their nation because they keep building on everyone elses territory! The Jews (Israelis for the most part) may not remember the Palestinians being nice to them. They don't remember them being evil to them either before the 1940s except for what...

don't be silly. what happened to jews didn't largely happen to any jews living today. it's like holding all non black people responsible for slavery. or all non red indian people responsible for what happened to them ,,,,, or all africans responsible for idi amin. the palestinians didnt...

the Jewish "race" is obviously a bogus concept. i have difficulty believing anyone with a non retard IQ believes it.

a lot of these people may be immigrants that will leave and be replaced by possibly non muslims. they should only build for the local permanent community at most. not for temporary migrants.

i don't mind where people do it as long as it doesn't cause wider ethnic discord (as Islam is long established in russia i dont think it does). there's probably less tolerance in france so doing it there just promotes discord. Why? I don't think everyone believes the same thing.

india would of course like to change the demographics of kashmir. i think this is believable.

The mastermind (RSS) is most important culprit here.

i'm sure they want to work.