Search results

or perhaps censorship in the interests on national security. If you could make a sensible argument, you wouldnt look like an a$$ as you currently do. ---------- Post added at 02:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:04 AM ---------- probably a farti bharati fanboy with all the...

you're feeding a troll. normally allowing foreign news channels to broadcast in a host country would be alright. however as Pakistan is currently in a war situation and being bombed, i think it should curb media freedom and only promote the pov that is best for the country. under...

It's difficult to explain this to you. You're not going to understand it. Terrorism is picking out innocent targets and terrorizing them, as Breivik did. So it was terrorism. His belief was that Europe was a Christian continent. He believed Islam was going to change that. He then...

yes genius, he did commit this cruelty because of his religious belief. If someone is Islamophobic, their motivation for taking part in Islamophobic acts would be religion. It's not difficult to work this out. ---------- Post added at 07:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:28 PM...

I'm not sure why you're bringing up other examples to try and justify German colonization of Poland or Lithuania, the people probably didnt like it in those countries. I'm not sure either you can justify Lithuanian land belonging to Germany when colonization 200 years before pushed...

yes genius, it wasn't planned. only the few hundred pre-planned actions he mentioned in his diary. Other than that it wasn't pre-planned :cheesy:

War reparations = plundering economies by the victors. The spread of industrialization occurred from West to East. The Soviet Union did come after Germany though the Soviet UNion's economy always was larger than Germany's before or after industrialization. What Germany did with...

take lithuania or poland then. personally I see resource drainage as a characteristic of colonialization when that resource drainage favours one group of people over another.

Might be delusional in that case but it wouldnt make him insane.

In fact I wasn't talking about non-European colonies. German colonization was local. It was European domination, Austria, Hungary, Poland etc.

you think colonialism didn't help set up the industrialization process in Germany? The Wermacht Republic was an utter failure economically. I agree that Germany did have some companies like you said. Is your point that the Soviet Union didn't have any companies and couldn't offer anything to...

Breivik made his decisions based on what he read in the news. He was fed information from the media he read then formed a conclusion, that Islam was about to take over Europe, and to go on a killing spree. Were his conclusions insane? Not based on the media reports (the media reports...

Bringing religion into the Breivik massacre is very appropriate because he was a member of a religious organization. The Knights Templar. The basis of Knights Templar was a Crusade, just the same as any other religious nut motivated by faith based hatred.

Germany wasn't this economic powerhouse you speak of. It had an Empire through conquest but it never did much more than economically collapse very quickly. What technology did the USSR badly need from Germany? They were industrializing much like Germany at the time was.

it's like talking to a brick wall. obviously all the civilizations and scholars of note that came from baloch or pashtun lands are part of baloch or pashtun history. if these lands happen to fall within the land mass of modern pakistan, it is part of pakistan's history. whether these...

Ancient Arabia is a very acceptable description because there is no country called Arabia. You follow so far? Because there is no country called Arabia people understand that it is a shared history from Tunisia till Oman. Ancient India isn't acceptable because there is a country called...

If the reference was Ancient Saudi Arabia to mean all of Arabia, you would indeed need to qualify this as Ancient UAE.

read: people born in the land area of part of Pakistan's history. It doesnt matter whether outsiders call them indian or brazilian.

so as long as outsiders refer to everything as Indian history, it must be true? It is no wonder India (modern) doesnt have a history. You let outsiders write it for you.

so your best defence is that the west says ancient indian and not ancient pakistani? do you not get the evidence in front of your own eyes. that these great indian inventors were born in the pakistani area?