Search results

But is is also not good to stop people from writing/speaking freely coz of fear of few Jihadis. It may be difficult but the world cannot accept this blackmail. Today Jihadis say don't do this. Tomorrow they will say don't do this, and so on. Jihadis and their supporters need to be...

Yes and that is the exact point I want to discuss about. In light of your statement - I would say that the "few" you refer to are the intolerant people/ the extremists/the terrorists. Now if you cannot prevent the few from doing something crazy, what is the solution? Put a ban on everyone from...

I acknowledge that. I was incensed by his last line where he recommends the solution. He says the west/people/world should change their ways, so that such incidents like Paris don't happen (Unjust killings). I am against this viewpoint. The world cannot be held hostage by few terrorists...

Fully agree with you. People have different sensibilities. Different people dislike different things. But you go ahead and write whatever you like about Armenian Genocide or about Anti-Sementic or about any race. Does not give anyone right to go and kill Pakistanis. Learn to accept and have...

and what is was the problem in this case? Publishing the cartoons? While it may have hurt someone. But it is no reason not to publish such cartoons again and it is no reason to kill someone either. Some people cannot take things lightly, but does not mean the whole world should be afraid of...

I know he told the possibility, but Abbasi is a coward. Abbasi solution is to "Change the definition" or to avoid printing or speaking or writing stuff that might hurt the terrorists or Islamic radicals. Instead of telling the terrorists to go **** themselves, he is asking the world to bow...

Yes please let me know what you understand by that statement from him, coz I failed to get your meaning. But to me it pretty much sounds what it is. He is saying to west, Change your ways or some of the 2 Billions Muslims will go Ballistic and Kill unjustly. In short he is asking the world to...

Abbasi urged the West to revisit and fix its definition of ‘freedom of speech,’ adding that failure to do so would result in someone from the vast comity of Muslims may go “ballistic and kill unjustly.” So in your opinion what does it mean, "some of the Muslims may go Ballistic and kill...

Warning against what? More attacks? More bombs? And that is a justified reaction? right? and so the writer suggests that the best way is to be afraid of those crazy Islamist terrorists and that whole world should be afraid of those thugs? Wow now everyone in world has to be afraid about the...

Check your FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION or some nuts out of the 2 billions will do something barbaric. What does that mean to you? To me it sounds like, "Please don't do anything that might hurt the lunatics feelings. Please be afraid of lunatics." How is it justified to be afraid of lunatics...

that again sounds like a threat. If Muslims have problem, go and protest. Or write articles about it. Ok? Don't act like terrorist or blow bombs or kill people. Don't tell Quran asks to give death penalth to those who defame Mohamed, and silly things like these. Forget cartoons, let's say...

Keeping the number for J7 and J8 out, I would be tilted in favour of IAF - Better technology and proven history.

that's essentially a threat. Change your freedom of expression or the 2 billion will come for you. That's pretty innocent.

Should be banned in India also. Burqa not only is a security risk, it also encourages segregation, and also an indicator of lower status for women in society.

My assertion is that TNWs have no deterrence capability. On the other hand if Pak says it will use TNWs and will NOT use strategic nukes if India does not use strategic nukes, is a bonus for IA. Whether 20KMs or 100 KMs the nukes fall inside Pakistan. Also IA is very well capable to avoid these...

But isn't this a massive price to pay. The damage to India is nothing compared to the decades long consequences for Pakistan. Not to mention the Pak economy would perish and the casualties for Pak would be 20 times India (cause of huge civilian concentrations on Pak side). Let's say there is a...

Forget Kashmir. If IA enters from Punjab side then it will soon be into populated areas of Pakistan. IA is a very big force. You cannot think that 100% IA will be required to enter into Pak. So in summary, - any nukes you use will kill Pakistanis as well. - the affected are will be inside...

Lets first agree IA can enter inside Pak. Otherwise there is no need for TNWs. So If IA enters it will not simply withdraw on its own. There needs to be some serious reason to think of not going further. That reason in this case is TNWs. But these TNWs will burst on Pak soil, isn't it? Lets...

Why will India need to Nuke Pakistan, if PA is going to Nuke Pakistan on its own. Good job TNWs and those who created them. :D

Noooooooooooooooo. I am not saying IA throw nukes at Pak. I am just mocking TNWs. See the theory is PA throws TNWs at IA when IA enters Pak. The idea is that this would kill the Indian advance. So if PA uses nukes on its own on Pak soil, it cannot accuse India. And if IA withdraw after the...