Which would result in exactly the same thing.
Thats a very light way of putting lol. Not to mention Vietnam has the Yakhont already so it would not add anything to their capability.
Not trying to be mean but most of the stuff on that list really shouldn't have to be imported.
The 12.7 mm especially is ridiculous as thats such an standard round
Comparisons on forums have 0 effect on ground realities of the two countries. The only thing that occurs is delusional people have circle jerks with other delusional people all they want but it doesn't change anything.
Do realize that India providing them with such would make India a rogue country likely to get embargoed by the entire UN. Not to mention Either USA or China would either intimidate or actively crush those countries before any serious setup could be done. The US has invaded countries for fake...
If Vietnam wants to buy from India thats absolutely fine. However Vietnam has almost always bought their high end systems from Russia. Im fairly certain India can neither match the prices and technology vs Russia.
Idk why we would ever want to go to Delhi during a war. That would be a war of occupation and thats simply not the goal of any armed conflict between India and China. The motive of the war would very likely be the same as 1962 where India over reaches vs China in territory or some other thing...
So with the upcoming 8 Yuan based export submarines which hold can hold up to 18 torpedoes or missiles internally Pakistan could realistically have up to 96 SLCM from those subs alone factoring each sub having 6 torpedoes each. They could also very likely come with dedicated vertical launch...
Man i feel like a Indian worker having to clean up all the crap that comes out. Instead of streets its webpages
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_incidents&oldid=479366958
I was wrong only 23 casualties.
to this page now...
I mean a straight up war vs either Pakistan or China would be dangerous. But a war vs both would only be a war of survival at best if it was all out war.
Oh no doubt the Vietnamese were much tougher then Indians but in the end it was their country that was crippled to this day due to the war. I would take humiliation over getting the scorched earth policy implemented over half of my country.
As to ground reality China is in a far better position...
Just saying I barely respond to anything nowadays but when Indians think they can get away with this kind of history changing in a digital age it just triggers me
I'm just telling it as it is. Its just funny watching all these Indians bragging about this incident when they only won it 4 years ago on wikipedia. But I guess thats better than anything they have ever achieved in reality so its whatever.
Ah i wondered when the 1967 thing was going to be brought up .
Been debunking it so often i just quote myself now.
Oh i actually went to wikipedia to see the changes made on the Chola incident. Heres the page from 4 years ago...
Oh i actually went to wikipedia to see the changes made on the Chola incident. Heres the page from 4 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_incidents&oldid=479366958
only 23 casualties.
to this page now...
Oh i actually went to wikipedia to see the changes made on the Chola incident. Heres the page from 4 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_incidents&oldid=479366958
I was wrong only 23 casualties.
to this page now...
I mean every thread that involves anything to do with the Sino Indian war will have Indians stating some of the following
1. Chinese Human wave Hurr Durr.
Then how the fk do they explain why the casualties are so lopsided in the Chinese's favor. So they telling me they basically lose more...