Search results

You said the WS 10 was not going to be used in single engine planes. That statement is factually incorrect as the J 10B is a single engine plane and is using the WS 10. Is that clear enough for you mister troll?

That can be "fixed' for you.

Only Indians would test turbofans only on the ground. Other countries are a little more practical in their applications.

Jealousy is an ugly thing is it not? The WS 10 series already powers over 50 J11BS, The prototype J 20, and J 15. Now it finally makes its way to single fighter like the J 10. If even picture proof it is in a single fighter like the J 10 can not prove anything to jealous trolls like yourself...

Your pants obviously. making statements and then saying their "classified" to cover up the fact that you're making stuff up is quite funny though.

Which would still have less thrust at 39,556 compared to the WS 15s 40,500lbs of thrust. And it says prototype testing will finish this year or the next. The WS 15 has already finished prototype testing last year.

Google translator =/= actual understanding of a language.

I don't make rules deciding who owns a company or not. Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Look I'm just looking at definable facts here. Whatever speculation you have on the reason of its position is up to you.

Whatever way you spin its still an European Company through and through. Basic business principles here.

Why don't you just quote it. Your anecdotes don't really mean much.

Does this change how its not Indian owned?

Basic business ownership laws would argue with Forbes.

All of which are in association with Indians calling Chinese copycats, non innovators and thereforth. In what other case would we need to resort to quantitative measures of a countries innovation for?

Do you not get what ownership means?

Hindustan Unilever is 52% owned by Unilever. It is by definition a British Dutch company. There is no room for argument. If a there was a Chinese Unilever with Majority ownership by a Chinese company or person then it would be Chinese. Otherwise it would still be British/Dutch.

Would we need to pull out our patents performance in comparison to India's if you guys don't start threads on Chinese patents and start gloating.? The only zeros are you Indians who constantly start troll threads about China when you guys are so much farther behind.

Maybe you should search what Unilever is dipwad Unilever - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia It is British-Dutch. Nothing Indian about it. We also have the 4th most innovative and the only Indian company on there is 9th. Brag when you are actually above not when you're below.

The real problem is Indians like yourselves laughing at others that are far ahead of you guys. One our companies is 4th and one of yours is ninth. Guess you're doing so much better right?

And the inferior as you say Asians here are gambling that US will intervene when it gets into a shooting war with China.