Search results

OK..........

I have been to many such forums. And as I said, in a running discussion such things are difficult to quote. If some one has any disquiet with it, they can always seek a reference, as they do it in foreign discussion forums as well. Now get over with it and move on or learn to live with it.

India does not have any such policy. It is just a draft nuclear doctrine, if you are referring to the same.

Such methodology is good for analytical work or papers. In a running discussion these aspects are left for the seekers to seek. If you or anybody else would have asked me, I would have given the reference.

I am civil enough for you. It is people like you who should learn to be civil.

Am I writing analysis papers here to quote references for pseudo-intellectuals like you.

I said, that it is the target which needs neutralization for which relevant yield may matter.

For Pakistan, there apparently is no difference between use of tactical nuclear weapons or tactical use of nuclear weapons. It is the target which needs neutralization for which relevant yield may matter.

You are a tin horn and you amply display your ability and expose your petty knowledge base every time you open your mouth. Let's examine Pakistan's nuclear thresholds and then you can comment further: A Pre-emptive Response Threshold (PRT) may be evoked against Indian actions that may be...

jadon moon vich rakh lao te saaray rang haray ho janday ne jadon labh lao te saanu vi das dena