Search results

A bit of historical correction here is in order ..... The Indian invasion of Indian Occupied Kashmir started much earlier than the Pathan intrusion and Pakistan Army’s involvement. It was all started by and planned in meetings between rulers of Alwar, Kapurthala and Patiala etc with...

Kiyun mein nay tum dono ki khoti ko haath lagaya hai ye kya mazak hai yaar ....... ha ha ha

oye butt saab ... aey ki khoo khatay khol ley hegay Who is Sania Mirza

hey baba stealth troll, when you are shown the mirror, it becomes India bashing. Or is it that your arguments have all but dried up. You are nothing but a tin horn and can last only as long.

Not many. But did you become a member. Nope.

Oh here you start trolling again. I thought we were discussing India's UNSC dream - ye Pakistan kidhar se beech mein aa gya.

Oye baba stealth troll, If India possesses such kind of support and strength, become a permanent member. Is anybody stopping India. According to you nobody. But it needs more than mere thinking greatness. Like I quoted Robert Kaplan in another thread, he said that India is one country where...

And if aunty had balls she would have been an uncle. It has been repeated here again and again that India's geopolitical clout is weak and it is not even a regional power. How can a country which does not agree to implement same UNSC resolutions, become a veto wielding member itself. How can...

And I was talking about the 1960s - dig the difference between WWII and 1960s. What a moron.

I narrated an event. One of the Indian posters wanted me to paste the link. I did that. And he didn't ask me to present link to dilli ki sarkar - he asked me to quote from where I got the event from, where I said that a raja offered his daughter. You started another troll - that it was not...

Funny man, I don't derail threads. It is you who conduct stealth trolling and derail anything that goes against Indian thinking. It is you who incite Indian posters here. And then conveniently vanish.

What do you mean by this tin horn. You are the biggest troll yourself, this side of Suez Canal.

If after all this lengthy diatribe, what you mean is that war is not an option - I agree with you. Secondly, PAF does not need quantitative parity with IAF. I think around 1:3 in hi-tech is appropriate to defend ourselves.

Every nuclear power has its reasons for first use and no first use. US has a first use policy, so does Pakistan, China, Russia and India has NFU. I assure you it has nothing to do with even a cricket ball. Warfare itself is not a happy topic to discuss. I am the link. You use your browsers...

Nothing at all. However, if aunty had balls she would have been an uncle.

Sir, many renounced economists however, say what I have narrated above.

This is contingent upon the duration of the war effort, the type of operations and their duration, AD capabilities, and many other factors. And at the end of the day and beyond a certain stage of loss sustenance, the viability of PAF would also be linked with nuclear brinkmanship...

In the 60s, US economy was in doldrums and the Americans went to the Saudis and requested them to declare dollar as the oil transaction currency. The Saudis being the strongest OPEC members agreed in return for certain guarantees. Everybody needed oil and all of a sudden oil was being sold in...

ha ha ha ..............

A new Bretton Woods is being evolved here.