Search results

Commiserations to RAW, Modi, Ajit Doval and bharatis.

Where is the 30% figure coming from? Pakistan has seen very significant reduction in poverty since the turn of the century. The world bank figures prove that: http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/country/PAK The WB poverty line being used is $1.90, which gives a poverty rate of 6.1% in...

That CPEC discussion was cringeworthy. Musharraf is right, India is not happy about CPEC and wants it to go away. You can see this sentiment from so many bharatis even if they do not express it overtly. They only ever talk negatively of CPEC -- what happens if it fails, are you selling...

First, when did Pakistan start TTP? Second, how does this have to do anything with what I said?

Bharat is the country that started this good terrorist/bad terrorist non-sense with Mukhti Bahni and LTTE. But no surprises, that nation is a hypocrite of the highest order.

Add to that: If Iran's sovereignty was compromised, why hasn't Iran protested this with Pakistan?

:lol::lol::lol:

You guys do the same when a Pakistani gets charged of crime as well. Why would you expect it to be any different?

Interesting. That's definitely not what I thought it would be, although obviously I don't follow Indian politics as much. Would be interesting to see how much it changes in 2019.

Was that 30-35% of total voting population or the people that turned out to vote? I have a hard time finding very many Indians that do not support Modi. I have found a few but for each one there seem to be 5-10 that support him.

I am not sure if this poll is even worth it. I think everyone knows it will be Modi. In general there is not much diversity of opinion in India, and Modi has something like 70-80% support.

@WebMaster @Horus can we fix the thread title? Bharati are creating misleading thread title on purpose.

You might be thinking of another group. LeJ is actually supported by bharat.

Looks like another misleading headline by bharati media. The statement appears to come from a retired general, not the US state.

How are you defining "doing business"? If you mean foreign companies having business ties with Pakistani companies or having business operations in Pakistan, then have you done any research on that? What is your proof they are not doing business in Pakistan? Even US companies do business in...

About 30 as far as I know. But it appears this was more an attempt to redirect the topic. Your PM was banned. That's not a normal citizen or even a celebrity. That should have been cause for concern.

I just explained that even France and UK are not on your side (no they are not on Pakistan's side either, they are neutral). And this is your response? I mean, did you completely ignore what I posted before and bury your head in the sand? I repeat, no one besides US, Bangladesh and Afghanistan...

The one about France does not saying anything like you suggest. Being unhappy over Hafiz Saeed's release is not the same as what you mentioned in your initial post. Have they said anything similar to what your country or Afghanistan or Trump have said? The UK article is 8 years old.

You seem to be suggesting that an exception to the rule - a few 100 Pakistanis wanting visa for India - is the norm for the rest of the Pakistanis. Not very many Pakistanis are interested in travel to India, so using an exception as an example is fallacious. Of course Pakistanis will have...

Again. Have these countries spoke against the Pakistani state like US has, or India or Afghanistan do every now and then? They have spoken against Hafiz Saeed. Hafiz Saeed is not the Pakistani state.