Search results

It is safe to assume that most F-16A/B "Netz" retired from service, except from the 'Agressor' red squadron. Israel offers them to Bulgaria, Croatia, e.t.c. And the M-346's are not in light attack configuration. Take them as pure trainers.

Eventually, yes, but it will take many years until we replace thousands of M113s in IDF.

Baseless quantitative assessments of sensitive issues are normally expressed by wild schoolboys. An adult normally wouldn't embarrass himself/herself with making such assessments.

You need to go back to school.

:yes4:

Possible, but unlikely scenario..

It means you shouldn't put it here, necroposter.

12/30/2015 Not just old news, but you are responding in a two-years old thread.

Since several decades ago the term 'tank' refers to MBT. The entire concept of tank's generations also refers to MBT's. And Carmel is certainly NOT an MBT. Even with a 120mm low recoil gun like this, it is going to be a 'light tank' or rather tracked 'tank destroyer'. With smaller caliber it...

Horizontally they just put in on a rail carriage with a booster to simulate free fall gravity.

Look, my English is far from being perfect, but in order to be able to wright properly you need to improve your English ASAP. Or at least learn to use a goddamned spellchecker.

No, we are not expecting to develop any new tank. MANTAK works on Eitan and Carmel, none of them is a tank.

MPR-500 is not a missile either. http://www.imi-israel.com/home/doc.aspx?mCatID=66598

June 2011... If you don't have any news, please, don't post old random shit.

X95, actually, formerly known as Micro-Tavor.

+1 to that

March 31, 2016

Yeah, sure... Wikipedia and nwi.com... Bullshit news. Iron Beam is far from being deployed.

What are you talking about? :rolleyes: