Search results

Half of world conflicts would end if NATO is disbanded now. They pushed gullible Ukraine towards dismemberment. They pushed arms into Syria without knowing who got them. They pushed Iraq and Syria into ISIS's arms. They dismembered Libya. Turkey is next in line to face a civil war after the...

Sounds like state propaganda. In any case, wiping off the last 10% of terrorist network is the hardest part. We should be interested only in how soon Syrian ground forces take control of their country's territory.

Is this a reliable newspaper? Interesting conversation if it is. One that Turkey deserves. I don't understand the fetish of Western governments to topple Assad. What comes after him will be even more terrible. They have a standing model called Iraq before them and they still don't learn. Even...

Putin is only responding to what NATO is doing. I don't think he would be interested in crossing the line of any country, least of all Turkey. He will not touch anyone unless they threaten Russian interests. Turkey's mere existence is not a threat to Russia. Their involvement in Syria is and...

Hi Salar, Any reliable sources for the increase in Kakul recruits? Also if you have numbers regarding the forces that will be recuited for CPEC, please post them.

As I said for the upteenth time, update yourself. :hang2: You were diverting the topic. I still will argue that India pursues people who kills its citizens(subject to caveats which are common to countries with low law penetration) I posted Khosa saab's article because you were still denying...

Please don't believe. This is getting old with Pakistanis. Read some news. It was initially blamed on jihadis. I just gave you an analogy. I don't want to take an ice-bucket challenge. I also don't want to walk on fire and burn down my house or even yours(which is what J&K plebiscite will lead...

What is your point here? OK brother, I submit. India lets off people who kills Indian muslims. Happy?! (FYI, if you are interested, in Gujarat, people got sentenced. Somebody was held accountable.) Just worry about Samjhauta case, since that is your concern. Read some news and update...

Ok. Looks like India accepted the risk. I think the cost benefit ratio is in India's favor. For too long, India stayed defensive with Pakistan for no tactical reason(except peace which was anyway a goner with the adversary).

Btw don't read jihadi literature. The death toll in Samjhauta bombing was 68 including Indians. And people got arrested for that. It is like daring someone for ice bucket challenge. India is saying 'Not interested!!'. What are you going to do about it?

Can't you read? I clearly said it may not deliver a Baloch state, but puts the nationalists in a better negotiating position. The more billegerent are always the most noisy. The silent majority's opinion is one which should bother us. In J&K, it is still unknown what is in their minds, what...

Baloch insurgency in 2006 could not have been supported by India. Manmohan Singh government's policy towards Pakistan is well known. Unless you demonstrate that his government clandestinely supported Baloch, which is impossible with people like Mani Shanker Aiyer in cabinet, you are just being...

That is a cable about ISI chief's remarks. Nobody believes in their honesty anymore. He could just be playing to the gallery to show that Pakistan is on US' side. Only concrete action by Pakistan with policy changes can be treated as reliable test of Pakistan's commitment. And as a small step...

Not as much that you would feel the heat. This is the first time India is directly threatening Pakistan with the Baloch stick. It may not deliver the Baloch a nation, but at least they will have a better negotiating position. You have no proof of Indian involvement in Balochistan, even today...

Read my post again. Yes, some do. I am sure India can find an organization with clean credentials and strong leadership to support.

People today easily miss the timeline. Hyderabad happened much later after Kashmir war started. Only Junagadh can be argued as a trigger for the Indo-Pak hostilities. IMO in hindsight, India should have let Junagadh accede to Pakistan and then could have found a chance like Bangladesh. But the...

Correction: terrorism has a definition which most Baloch groups do not meet. They don't kill and dump civilians. They are clear about their aims and there is no religious bigotry/hatred among most Baloch nationalists.

No need for this. Hindu is a reliable newspaper.

Don't divert the topic of discussion between me and Akhelios. Pakistan claims J&K for itself or not. It does as per what Bhutto does. And let us put off the discussion about the 'self-governance' system of GB or Azad Kashmir. It is 'self'-governance only in the convoluted sense that Kashmiris are...

@Tridibans, you asked the wrong guy @jamahir to validate your prejudice against muslims. Jamahir would say screw Muslim personal law :D I am not interested in defending any brigades. But I am sure anyone who is secular and progressive will want muslim personal law abolished in India. And there...