Search results

Yes but the point is, they won't be able to hold the heights or control the area which they do now. Eventually it has to be a no man's land.

I had recently been thinking that given the advancements in drone & precision strike technologies, how easy it would be for Pakistan to dislodge Indians from Siachen glacier. We can easily make their stay on top hell & force them to abandon their positions. I agree the same can be done to...

A quite similar accessment by former RAW Chief A S Dulat. But those people are long gone & are replaced by those who believe supressing minorities in India will affect Pakistan.

That doesn't mean that they will be able to do it in future & that too without US help. They were forced to hand back Sinai. Their biggest threat is Iran these days who has reached their doorsteps & is consolidating. Respect your Nationalism but you are nothing without US. The day US pulls back...

That's your opinion. Why did you let Sinai go if you were in a such strong position? Clearly US thought they won't be able to save you next time. Why get it as an aid when you can get it through R&D business dealings as you claimed. Good Afternoon mate, I believe you meant this Israel...

They saved you from Natzi's. Europe was almost lost had US not intervened & your dream of promised land would still be a dream. Why bother getting 4 Billions annually if it's not enough?? When did Turkey fought Hizbullah?? The fall always starts with arrogance. Good luck with Iran. Had you...

US....They sheltered your people. Fought your enemies. Provide Billions in military n economic assistance every year. Receive hatred from rest of the world in return for your diplomatic support. Still you think you can survive without them? How ungrateful Sir, I respectfully disagree. Israel...

They definately saved you in 1973 & more importantly at UNSC ever since. Don't be unthankful.

And your existance is only until Uncle Sam's backing

I already gave you the answer. A little research would have saved you from the embarassment.

That's the point.... they were soldiers & not politicians. Politics is all about power struggle but you don't go against your motherland. It didn't took very long for Bangali's to kill their father of the nation along with his family. If Mati had a grudge he could have taken it out without...

Whatever reasons maybe one should not collude with sworn enemy against motherland. You should be ashamed of yourself by putting a Shaheed in the same bracket as a traitor. You are suspecting actions of a Shaheed who laid down his life. It's only due to likes of him that Indians put their...

Whatever reasons maybe one should not collude with sworn enemy against motherland. You should be ashamed of yourself by putting a Shaheed in the same bracket as a traitor.

What are your reasons to doubt otherwise? The canopy was opened from inside, Mati's dead body was found outside. He was not wearing parachute so there is no reason for him to eject. Minhas's body was inside the cockpit. He was the only one who could have done it. There were no technical issues...

This was no reason to collude with Indians. MM Alam could have done it but he remained loyal despite being grounded. Siding with enemy just because one election result was denied is no reason. Political fights can always be fought within the system. Mati in my eyes will always be a traitor...

Apparantly neither Pakistan nor it's airspace was used. Reports suggest it was one of the central asian countries. Some US media outlets are suggesting Kyrgyzstan.

So basically Pakistan had allowed it's airspace to be used unless they took the northern route from one of their bases in Tajikistan if any.

Pure speculation on my part but it could be the interim solution due to failure to precure T129s. As the deal didn't materialise & Super Mashak export which was primarily signed to offset cost for T129s that Pakistan decided to buy another Turkish system from that money instead.

Naa wait for PAF to prove it as it did for F-16 vs SU-30.

US would certainly like to keep an eye on Afghanistan. For that they need to have atleast an air corridor if not Shamsi like arrangement. "Absolutely Not" didn't help. Whether it was only IK decision, I don't know. I'll only give weight to foreign conspiracy theory if any of above is given. But...