I dont call others idiots to insult others, I call them idiots only because it suits them.
The issue is WHO CARES what it is whether it is criminal investigation or your HR investigation. The word was even brought by Mangala and none else. The point is it is a report that concluded grave war...
I didnt ask you what a criminal investigation is,nor didnt I ask you what the difference between Criminal investigation and a Human rights Investigation. Does a Human rights Investigation even exist? LOL...
my point is Mangala S statement is a completely hollow one. when the UNHRC chief has...
really? Is that because an idiot like you have nothing to say?
The best person to decide what that report is none but Zeid himself. And he said that the report's conclusion is grave war crimes. Saying that it is a human rights report and not a criminal report was done by the stupid lingerie...
To be fair to rajiv, the decision to send army to SL under any context had been in indian agenda from early days. Even before india gandhi.
LOL India never supported eelam.
SL government always pointed out that LTTE had no committment towards any agreement. And they were correct all these...
what is UNHRC report? It accuses SL of war crimes and what differences does it make whether it is criminal or human rights investigation. You are bloody idiot that suits Mangala S.
Then what is foreign judges, foreign lawyers and prosecutors doing in court? Dont you know a court is being set...
So what is in UNHRC report and where was I wrong? Point where I was wrong.
An FM is there to defend the country and not to betray a country. An FM and a PM who doesnt have a spine to say we did a just war and we defended our territory..what is the use of them?
I can answer you very well, it...
Even if the report is extremely biased against SL and contain incorrect things....then any UN agency can come up with whatever they think and our gov is going to accept it without defending the country?
It is going in circles. Actually SL have been facing the UN issue since 1983. It is not a...
A foreign minister is there to talk on behalf of the government and the country, not to say his random utterances. There is a weight to what he says in a UN forum. he is not discussing over his dinner with friends. If you have found a single source that shows where the SLG has expressed anything...
This is where Mangala S talked about the report.
UN Report Is Well-Balanced And Unbiased: FM Mangala Samaraweera | Colombo Telegraph
Not a word against the report. that is not a single politician that is the FM. Remember he was the person who met Solheim few months ago. In report UN...
No one is crushing no one's economy. It is controlling the economy. Past pacts with India have been disadvantageous for SL. So going for another is stupid that is without any evaluation on why the past pact failed on SL's behalf.
Because the FM already said report is good and not biased while it is not..and accepted the report.
yes, but it has to be under universal jurisdiction..
I have to take your words. But i hardly trust RW.
It is in the report, in pg 251. And the gov is accepting the report.
how is it being humanitarian any different? I didnt see teh final draft and the report had asked for foreign prosecutors.
well what makes you think SL courts will not allow it? RW himself said there would be ones from CW.
the report suggests so and the government is accepting it..
which countries supported SL? US...a big LOL...US wanted to keep the war going on in SL in low intensity not finishing the war. And US pressurised the SLG to stop the war and let the LTTE leaders to surrender to a THIRD party...and...
No this government is policy is not balanced but rather pro western..actually bowing down infront of west.
Do you see this gover acts along with the national interests of SL? I hardly do so.
Everything this gover did after coming into power are the things west and india wanted to get done.