Talk about things you know, Tamil separatist was not certianly started by India, it has roots in 1920s when universal suffrage was brought to SL but the war and human suffering was started by India.
Yes MR did many white elephant projects at the same time he did a lot of projects that are worthy. Hambanthota port is a good thing. Infrastructure development all over SL is a good thing. He made Colombo look like a capital city. Just go and see how SL was when MR became president in 2005. The...
LOL
RW has a more dirty past more than your dirty ex MR ministiers. ever heard of Gonawala Sunil?
RW is the one who brought this bridge thing after all....
Unfortunately some in SL believe that. but it is fastly being proven wrong..with new archaeology evidence
No one is shouting here, we are presenting rational explanations and well discovered historical facts. SL is sinhala as much as Tamil nadu is Tamil
Are you talking about your theory?
Of...
How can there be tamil tribes in SL when there was no tamil tribes in TN itself? A tamil consiousness started much later. If any native people lived in SL they became modern day sinhalese. There are ample evidence for that in South of SL and actually all over SL.
Erase tamil culture? was there...
The ones who categorized the languages are normally white people. The ones who studied sinhala didnt know Tamil and likewise.
Your only point in your whole argument is Sinhala is Indo Aryan so Sinhala came from North India...
Now I will tell you this again..this time in point form to make it...
@dravidianhero,
Do you know that Hindu scriptures like Bhagwat Puran, Varahamihira's Brihatt Samhita, Garuda Puran, Vaijayanthi refer to SL as Sinhala?
Do you know that Ptolemy called SL in 131 AD as Silai? And Cosmos had referred to SL as Siyala Diva? Do you know that Thailand used to call SL...
How do you say clearly? what sources do you have with you? what evidence except your mental imaginations...Give me a single source that identifies a tamil civilisation in SL?
I would say they were not tamilians but the people who inhabited here are the ancestors of the modern day Sinhalese...
First I dont know why Sinhala is termed Indo aryan, I dont think it fits either categoray. To be honest me as a sinhalese dont have a big deal what is a aryan or what is dravidian..we are just sinhala, Aryan/Dravidian business is purely an indian business not ours..
Sinhala does show...
@dravidianhero
if there is any civilisation in any country there is a product by that civilisation. Show me a single product by a tamil civilisation in SL? tell me a single thing...show me a single thing..
Products of a civilisation are language, literature, architecture, folk lore, beliefs...
That means the sinhalese didnt come from North india...we had waves of immigration from all parts of India but all of them were absorbed by the native sinhala civilisation.
Because Sanskrit and Pali was known to sinhala intellectuals..And Buddhism which is in pali langauge got state patronage...
Are you so stupid? Do you know that Hindu epics like Mahabharata identified SL as sinhala?
Do you know that Hindu scriptures like Bhagwat Puran, Varahamihira's Brihatt Samhita, Garuda Puran, Vaijayanthi refer to SL as Sinhala?
Do you know that Ptolemy called SL in 131 AD as Silai? And Cosmos...
what are the rights that have been taken away from the tamils in SL?
I bet you re referring to mahavamsa. To begin with it is NOT a religious book rather a historical prose. Yes mahavamsa speaks about a vijaya prince, but modern day historians and even early historians did not believe it for...