Search results

Indian now claim this is the video of the shot down F-16 Thought?

That is a myth Indian claim: However, that part belongs to Mig-21 Indian tweet claims this: But unfortunately for them, all Pakistan F-16 use F-100PW229 and F-100PW200 engine

Indian also claim: But unfortunately for them, all Pakistan F-16 use F-100PW229 and F-100PW200 engine

India claims this: But they are too stupid to realize this:

Not if your rcs is small http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=27934&p=301515

Then it will be detected by others means like EOTS, DAS or APG-81

The main point of MADL is low probability of intercept. Like the whole point separate a B-2 from a B-52 is how hard to detect it

Not really, like i said earlier, data link been around for a while but stealth data link is recent. Gripen TIDLS is an encrypted datalink that link four aircraft, but it's stealth characteristics is not even close to that of MADL. TIDS still uses UHF band (0.3-3 Ghz) to transmit information...

Information about F-35 nozzle are available, including pattern http://www.f-16.net/f-16_versions_article20.html https://www.google.com/patents/US20090072044 https://www.google.com/patents/US6983602 http://www.google.com.gi/patents/US20020036241 https://www.google.ch/patents/US6398129 I agree...

F-35 uses higher bypass engine so the plume radiance is lower than low bypass engine The spikes design of F-35's nozzle (LOAN nozzle) reduce exhaust length And finally, the nozzle has internal pipes to lead cooling air

If USA really wanted to, they can buy LAHAT from Israel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAHAT

There isn't anything bias about pointing out the size difference between RBE-2 and APG-81, APG-82 or that F-35 has smaller RCS. I didn't brush off benefit of intangible treatment. I simply point out the very obvious fact that there isn't any generation difference between RBE-2 and APG-82, and...

PAK-FA focus more on aerodynamic so they sacrificed some stealth characteristic.

Iam not talking about RCS but purely about radar ability to detect an object at distance. Physics will favor bigger radar. Even a very large generation gap in technology can be balanced/countered by the sheer size alone. Not to mention that if there is any technology gap between RBE-2 and...

More modern system can be more efficient and powerful than an old system that has similar size or a bit bigger. But technology has its limit, even the newest F-16's AESA radar such as APG-80 or APG-83 still have much shorter range than Mig-31's PESA radar aka Zaslon-M. Because Zaslon-M is...

Just because it has AESA doesn't mean it can detect and lock the F-35 from a meaningful distance. AESA isn't some magical solution. Rafale radar is among the smallest between the Eurocard and much smaller than APG-81. F-15E can't detect F-35 even though, it is likely the fighter with the most...

The F-35A's overwhelming superiority has been recorded in some of the most epic air combat in NATO history when the USAF fighter met for the Atlantic Trident (April 12-18), French Rafale fighters and British Eurofighter Typhoon , some results from which they began to leak. The F-22 fighters of...

Radar scattering diagram of some fighter: F-35 Mirage 2000 Mig-21 https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/stealth-techniques-and-benefits/

https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/electro-optical-systems/

IR - RF stealth techniques https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/stealth-techniques-and-benefits/