exactly my point.
HINDUs thought it was their land NOT the land of the people living on it. who were muslims and chose to own the land run the land have rights over the land.
see how two nation theory pinches the hindus of india because they never thought muslims have any right to the land.
@amardeep mishra
i would let deterrent answer you as he knows more about the subject then i do. BUT i would like to enlighten you on education institutes in Pakisan that teach engineering and applied sciences.
specially
KANUPP Institute of Nuclear Power Engineering.
Google
repeating yourself again and again doesn't convince anyone except maybe yourself that you don't care.
so i would let you go back and read my post number 378 enjoy
like i said the indian muslims the less we talk about them the better they couldn't do anything about their so called left over brother kashmiris nor could they stop babri masjid neither could they stop gujrat massacre.
so yes they are so numb that they cannot be expected to even speak up for...
surely the same way indians would not understand the 2 nation theory. if they did they would have let Kashmir go. But from day one they just cared about the land not the people.
i am sure if muslims had decided to walk over to myammar they would not have a problem. the problemfor india was they...
MASUMANA SAWAL TO ALL INDIANS:
they claim all pakistani weapons and systems are of chinese origin.
then they claim the following copy pasting from the report:
According to reports, North Korea obtained "many of the designs for gas centrifuges and much of the machinery" required to make...
Alot of your predictions in your post have been trashed now. and all this when india has the most benign of all the muslim world.
who couldn't raise a voice for either the gujrat muslims,or mumbai muslims and let's not even speak about the kashmiri muslims.
however, currently the opposite seems to be happening
Pakistan likely to secure civil nuclear deal with US: report - The Express Tribune
Obama invites Pakistan's PM to White House as Susan Rice visits Islamabad | World news | The Guardian
Russia, China and Pakistan: An Emerging New Axis? |...
Best example of how an external affairs minister can twist and turn words. i think Natwar Lal should right his own book!
clearly he has twisted the words of poor ol Kasuri and tried to steal his thunder
we still maintain that all issues would be discussed BUT discussions should have no preconditions. we cannot and will not take dictation.
we have never rejected discussing terrorism. neither has our NSA nor our PM said we will not discuss so called terrorism.
However, seems like india wishes...
what had musharraf agreed upon? I am sure Kiyani would have known. Hence the myth that zardari was willing to sign but Kiyani was reluctant cannot be known for sure. unless we remove the smoke screen from what was actually agreed upon between Musharraf and Manmohan. so i would believe that...
both the links you posted do not high light what deal was being agreed by zardari. or the framework.
however, in agra a declaration was ready if the framework as you wished to call it was established. maybe in a year or couple of years Musharraf and Manmohan could have worked out a deal .
But...
this sir,
is a history that most people don't know. the junagadh incident is brushed under the carpet and hence people forget that it was Junagadh incident that set the precedent for the whole Kashmir issue.
it is an indian website so you would have to take it with a pinch of salt.
Kiyani was hand picked by Musharraf and i doubt he would curtail the plan set in motion by his senior.
However, doread the link i posted :
The Declaration would have raised Vajpayee's standing internationally and at...