Search results

Few tanks were damaged lightly, most were completly destroyed beyond repair after that you cooked up some statistics about mythical "restored" tanks. Deal with it, looney.

moron, stop playing with words. tank is lost permanently or temporarily if it cant fight. again no one give a f*ck how many tanks you "restored" from a screw after the war and what terms you use to cook up statistics. what is matter is that you lost 50 tanks to rag-tag militia, remeber that...

Bwahaha what a retard. that means you lost it untill it will be restored that could take months. and its not faked statistics what matters, its about rag-tag militia trashed 50 your tanks, looney.

Yep, sure, evacuated tank with killed crews, later restored = means tank was never lost at all. Israeli know how :lol: Get lost, looney. Your army failed miserably all objectives, lost 50 tanks and got humilated by few hundreds of rag-tag militants. Killing 1000+ civilians is a credit for you...

Grats, looney, you got few missiles while losing 50 tanks to few hundreds of rag-tag militants. What a humilation :lol:

Stop making up excuses, thats laughable. That was most humilating lose in the history of mordern warfare.

Your 30,000 strong army was owned and humilated by few hundreds of rag-tag militia and then kicked out of Lebanon. Yep, it happened mostly because of missilies with superior Russian tech.

Too bad rag-tag militia from Hezbollah wasnt informed about that. They thought that those tanks were metal junk delivered for scrapping :lol:

lol no surprise here. Its well known fact in Russia that you will be more than happy to use the opportunity to lie, cheat or decept. Dont worry, Russia is rerouting its gas to China, Japan and S.Korea. In few years you will start feeling increasing gas starvation. And btw Russia doesnt have...

Those things are like 16 IRSTs combined together :lol:

Just comparing the profile area size of aircrafts which is one of the most important parameters for stealth we can conclude which aircraft is stealth and which not. No i said whether anything attached to wing has the ability to move or not doesnt matter for radar.

Levcons are part of the wing and dont affect stealth in any way. It doesnt matter for radar whether part of the wing has ability to move or not. It sees it just like a normal wing.

Chinese physics here :lol: Why do you compare size of stealth aircraft with non-stealth aircrafts? Look at RCS of B-2 and compare it with RCS of F-117 this is what i was talking about. RCS of J-20 and PAK-FA will be like that. And this is real physics :lol:

Compare this: Look at canopy size ralative to the rest of aircraft. Notice how frontal area size in sq. meters of J-20 is about 3 times(!!!) bigger than PAK-FA. That basically means that one J-20 is equal to three T-50s combined together :lol: And that even without taking in account...

Amateur Chinese radar producers doesnt even know what are the features of top Russian military radars. And they have no way to even learn that without spending decades on research. Theres no difference here with engines. Russia is exporting its radars to China with most of advanced functions...

Yep, Russia has not yet built new type of AWACS, destroyer, aircraft carrier and has only one type of 5-th gen fighter. According to Chinese logic that supposedly should mean that Russia is behind China in radars and engines :lol:

Stone age avionics are something what China produced at that time. There are no doubts that your paper "AESA" radars as advanced as your "5-th generation" engines :lol:

A lot of hot air and bold claims from the guy who was flying with archaic mechanical radars while Soviet Union was already 20 years ahead with PESA tech. Sad reality. Deal with it.

Sure and well designed PESA radar will smoke mediocre designed mechanically scanned system.