What's new

Search results

  1. zzzz

    Antonov stalls An-132D programme

    They dont produce anything except fake stories :lol:
  2. zzzz

    Spoiled Israel playing with the wrong country

    Senile troll cannt last a day here without liyng. Israel bombed nothing near S-400 its completly in different place. 20 Israeli missiles were intercepted by Syrian Air Defence, nothing was hit except some empty building. Another miserably failed attack.
  3. zzzz

    Turk-Russian Approach: Russia is ready to offer joint production of Su-57 fighters to Ankara

    Here is some education for you. The main parameter that affects radar and EW capabilities of the plane is the power output. To jam anything you should generate more powerful signal to silence enemy radar. To increase output power you need to increase electricity power that comes from engines...
  4. zzzz

    Turk-Russian Approach: Russia is ready to offer joint production of Su-57 fighters to Ankara

    RCS of the plane is not described by one number. The given RCS figure can be the lowest magic angle number. It can be 30 degrees frontal average RCS which is many times bigger. It can be 360 degrees average which is many times bigger than frontal average. RCS figure may include RAM effect or may...
  5. zzzz

    Turk-Russian Approach: Russia is ready to offer joint production of Su-57 fighters to Ankara

    :lol: The only way the flying brick F-35 can supercruise if it drops all its weapons and fuel. Thrust to weight ratio of F-35: 0.97 Thrust to weight ratio of SU-57 with current engines: 1.05 Thrust to weight ratio of SU-57 with new engines: 1.21 Thrust to weight ratio of SU-35: 1.02 You have...
  6. zzzz

    Turk-Russian Approach: Russia is ready to offer joint production of Su-57 fighters to Ankara

    He doesnt need any access. Sukhoi just created 3d models of F-22 and PAK FA airframes, then calculated and compared their RCS. SU-57 and F-22 actually have a lot in common in frontal and side aspects and there is nothing strange if SU-57 have lower RCS than F-22 from some of angles.
  7. zzzz

    Turk-Russian Approach: Russia is ready to offer joint production of Su-57 fighters to Ankara

    Sure. Alexander Davidenko, chief designer of the Su-57, compared the RCS of PAK FA and F-22: "The F-22 aircraft has RCS of 0.3-0.4 m². We have similar requirements for visibility." Russia doesnt need clone of F-22. SU-57 is superior to F-22 in aerodynamics and all aspects except for stealth.
  8. zzzz

    Turk-Russian Approach: Russia is ready to offer joint production of Su-57 fighters to Ankara

    SU-57 is as VLO as F-35. Stop spamming your BS fantasy figures pulled out of someone *** and spouting nonsense here. Except for stealth F-35 doesnt meet any 5th gen requirement (SU-57 meets all) and can be considered as true 4.5gen jet like Rafale. Reality check:
  9. zzzz

    U.S. defense firms begin adjusting Turkish F-35 exit

    Russian SU-34s were in action near Israeli border bombing Israeli supported terrorists and providing air assistance for Iranian units and Hezbollah. American-origin Patriots failed to do anything about that.
  10. zzzz

    Saudi Arabia is interested in the transfer of "Ukrainian Armata" tank technology

    God gift? So far Saudi Arabia got nothing from Ukraine except fantasy stories and paper projects. You still dont understand what is Ukraine. Its just a huge fake generating fraud entity. Their defence industry is unexisting. The only military product that was developed in Ukraine and in serial...
  11. zzzz

    U.S. sends message to Turkey, halts F-35 equipment shipments

    It shoots downs 90% of all incoming Israeli missiles, thats why after 7 years of attacks Israel managed to hit only 2 out of ammo Pantsirs and failed to hit any single S-200 launcher after the humiliation of losing F-16. Never used before, but succefully shot down F-16 at first attempt with...
  12. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Dont cry dumb troll. All these areas dont even have one layer of defense, let alone multylayer. The number of Syrian bases alone is greater than the number of Pantsirs Syria has in possession. Attacking an object that is being protected by one Pantsir is no-brainer, just launch some bombs and...
  13. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Yeah, destroying dozen of empty buildings is great achievment of Israeli propaganda :lol: So what we have: For 8 years Israel was mostly striking Syrian targets that were not protected by any air defence. Few dozens of relatively modern Syrian air defence units are enough to protect only very...
  14. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Thanks for laugh :lol: 99% of those "attacks" are just Israeli propaganda Baghdad Bob stories for imbeciles like you and Netanyahu sheeple, that either failed completly, hit some empty desert or never happened at all with money stolen by Netanyahu croocks. So we still have: Losing F-16 to...
  15. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    You dumb lying troll, fragment holes can have many different shapes and forms, that depends on million of factors. The second lower marked hole on your own image is exactly like you want it to be, imbecile. So we have: Losing F-16 to archaic S-200, failed mesirably to suppress and jam it...
  16. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Moron, dozens of Syrian radars currently active and on duty. Launchers with S-200 are ready to be used to shoot down more Israeli jets. Thats all because Israel failed to track down any single S-200 launcher and destroy it. This thing i highlighted for everyone to see :lol: I see you are in...
  17. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    See full Russian MOD briefing, everything is there. What you showed is irrelevant. Its unknown when they were destroyed and by whom. You never destroyed any single S-200 launcher. It will be used again when needed. What it achieved is shooting down Israeli F-16 showing backwardness of...
  18. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Another funny attempt to lie by dumb troll. No, they showed much more than that. Launchers were not empty. And they are not empty now. Destroying empty launchers also does make sense. You destroyed one radar. Syria have dozens of radars and you never destroyed them either. Israel always brags...
  19. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Too bad you have no evidence of that. BTW if you fire dozen of missiles simultaneously against one Pantsir it doesnt matter whether it has ammo or not.
  20. zzzz

    4 Pantsir S-1s VS 1 UAV

    Parts of the missiles with shrapnel holes from SAM are available for everyone to see. Trolls can live in denial. Evidence exists only for 2 Pantsirs. As for "many" other air defences except for couple of stationary radars in unknown conditions in 8 years almost nothing. Particularly not a...
Back
Top Bottom