To have two possibilities of naval architecture - Speed, radar stealth etc... -. Notably one less armed, one with less firepower (Without second ’48 cell Tactical length MK-41 VLS’ - Possible all Gezgin cruise missile - ).
MK-41 VLS
You have many money ? :partay:
...
...
Quote :
In the span of just 30 minutes, the U.S. military launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syriafrom two Navy destroyers in the Mediterranean Sea.
An hour later, beginning around 8:45 p.m. ET Thursday, the missiles hit their targets at the Shayrat Air Base in Homs Province...
Nobody says that there were no other classified targets (Top secret) - Bunkers, high-ranking Alawite officers etc... A sweet message -. ;)
And anyway, this is absolutely nothing. It was just a tiny warm-up to see the reactions.
They (US) launched more than 3,000 Tomahawks in just 1 month on...
This is not true! The capacity of the S-400 is overrated. Like all such systems, it is enough to saturate them for put him on his knees. That is why the Ballistic Missile Defense System does not work against a massive nuclear attack.
...
:blah:
WORK !!! Work, work and work to achieve the necessary technology for the next 50 years, 100 years, 200 years. Because that is what has always been ‘the problem’. By then shut up !!!
...
Yes ! Unfortunately that's it (Always) ! It is necessary to be able to completely saturate the S-400 and only a rain of cruise missile (Tomahawk) launched from submarines and boats is able to do so.
...
Don't tell anything !
Assad was definitely losing Syria from the summer of 2013. That's why he did that :
Ghouta chemical attack
Seeing no reaction from Obama, the Russians installed the S-400 to permanently protect Assad from any air attacks from another enemy nation outside the USA.
...