Thread reported. It is a violation of the rules to address moderator grievances publicly.
Honestly, I think the moderators are fair and honest enough. Iranian members get banned regularly as well (my good friend PGK and Abii got banned so many times). The difference is, they don't whine like...
Yes, sad to witness. And look at his thankers too. The underlying reason is their hedonistic, irrational and almost fanatic hatred for Iran. They are prepared to go at any length. Even if it means the pursuit of terrorism.
If you know about regression to mean and central tendency, you'd be aware that too much of anything is not good.
General modesty is fine.
But when you add the ridiculous headscarf or the Burka outfit, you get what would be called "diminishing returns" and go in the red.
Our "intellect...
Iran pretty much has these terrorist rats under control. Only desperate fellow terrorists continue to chant "freedom fighter".
Too bad, they got their as$ handed to them by IRGC. :D
You must be too emotional right now.
I suggest cooling down and coming back to earth.
This subject has been debated extensively by me elsewhere. Best way out for pakistan is to bend over, as Peaceful Civilian suggested before in this topic.
Or else, the thing which didn't happen during Osama...
I suggest you stick to the topic rather than questioning other's faith which may be deemed offensive by others. Unless you want moderator action against you.
You need to get back to earth.
When there is a threat from Panetta of ground intervention + the largest a/c is moved so close to pakistan, it should be a red signal.
About afghanistan, you are simply trying to divert the topic.
Usually at least one a/c is at North Arabian Sea to keep Pakistan in check but moving this close signals something (if this news is true). Perhaps, US is getting ready to physically threaten pakistan to open NATO supply in the future.
In extreme case, a ground invasion to secure a route from...
I did. For the 3rd time, I'm still waiting for your reply to the points I raised: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/183869-whos-right-israel-palestine-11.html#post3035885
The said article is mediocre at best. It does not address any issue which Israel makes in it's defence.
Terror zone shift: Syrian insurgents 'try to set up new belt of strongholds'
Terror zone shift: Syrian insurgents 'try to set up new belt of strongholds' — RT
While Homs is nearly under control of the government, terrorists and insurgents try to escape north and east. The Syrian...
I debated this with armstrong elsewhere extensively. In short, a burka/hijab is harmful to the moral fibre of a society in the long run and should be banned. Not to mention many are forced into wearing it from a young age.
Not to mention that nowhere in islam is it mandated to wear burka or...
I do not see how banning oppressive clothes like burka or hijab can be considered racist?
Other religious symbols are also banned in France, not only Burka.
Good. Whole Europe must ban this ridiculous, oppressive, un-Islamic and Saudi tribalistic piece of clothing. This ban should be enforced more strictly with heavier fines imposed.
I comprehensively did so here but received no concrete response from you: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/183869-whos-right-israel-palestine-11.html#post3035885
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The article does not debunk...