Search results

And how is that going to change what’s about to happen? You’ve already given KJ a death sentence, aka used your leverage. Him now speaking openly, about kidnap, torture or confession under duress will be openly said to the consular rep. You can record it and we want you to lol Something has to...

Please go through the below. The above claim that the ICJ considers him a spy is open to interpretation when I read it. But as is all law, so.... You’re entitled to your view, I’m not reading any mention of the court passing judgement on him being a spy.

Translation “I didn’t get punched in the face, I broke his/her hand with my face” Lol

I’ve been drilling this for 5 pages now.. Where were you when I needed this my enlightened Pakistani friend?

Oh it’s not what is on record that is going to be spun. It’s everything that didn’t happen that we can make it look like it did that should bother you lol Trust me, he knows he’s dead. For him, he has nothing more you can offer that will make him sing your tune..you played your trump aka death...

This is your extrapolation of the judgement. Stick to what is being said by the ICJ.

Bhai, uski maut to pakki hai. Ussay to punar Janam hi Lena padega. That’s guaranteed. But for India, this is a way to spin the story. And we will. Trust me.

Right and we will spin the rectal exam as torturous sodomy to extract confessions. That’s what building a narrative is. #himtoo lol

Then why are we fighting in ICJ boss? Make some sense. It’s the fact that he was denied his right to consular access is what was granted and argued in court.

Bhai, Apki reality hi kuch aur hai. Aap mast raho. Aam khao, gutliyan mat gino.

Ask who? Pakistan? Who is fighting for KJ in Pak? No one. So even if the ICJ asks this, how will it get an honest appraisal of the situation? Was KJ presented on stand? No. How does the court know his version without speaking to him in person? The point of the ruling is that lack of consular...

Your First mistake... You think this is a fight for justice.. lol

How would proof of such be admissible or presented to the ICJ when no consular access was given to KJ and all interviews were under Pak supervision? The narrative building starts now, and ICJ just gave us that opportunity. This is going to be a media trial. And whoever has the bigger reach and...

As if you didn’t know he was expendable. He’s a damn spy, even he knew he would be dissowned and sacrificed. National interests reign supreme. That’s unfortunately the spy game.

And that’s exactly what consular access and right to a lawyer gives us. To prove our version of events, among other things such as coercion, torture and kidnapping. Point is, so far the Pak narrative has been one sided with coerced and scripted videos by KJ. Now we can open up that kimono

I thought the rule was look but don’t touch! Yes Kaisa Wala club hai, no seeing, only feeling (mahsoos) lol

Give us time, the song will hit better than a Ustad Fateh Ali’s masterpieces. Aap to jaante hain, we are film and drama specialists. Indians are natural storytellers lol

Yeah we first need to establish that there is even a connection, outside the claims being made by Pak.

Bhai yeh aakashwani humay bhi dhikhaiye! Akele akele?! Not fair boss!

All India needs is consular access and a few statements from Jadhav claiming he was kidnapped, tortured and under duress... Then let our media run wild with it.. Jadhav is only a spy/terrorist in a vacuum. Give us access to him and we will turn him into a philanthropist that came to Pakistan...