Search results

Buddy; I’ve written like 50 posts on this thread. Can’t you just go through those and quote me what you find relevant so I can respond? It’s nearly happy hour here..and I need a cold brew to beat this heat.

I love your mental gymnastics! But I will commend your “glass half full” attitude as well... True Pakistani patriot I must say.

Do it if you have the muster up your peanuts and find out lol

And yet you can’t hang him... It’s been what 6-7 months, longer? Why even go to trial? So you could get schooled internationally on how to behave like a responsible nation? Some of you are just strange creatures.

If only Pakistan could...dream come true for Indian designs Will be like stepping on a mine you planted yourself lol

Don’t think that’s a choice anymore. Consular access is a condition, as is stay on the death penalty.

Right because your country didn’t just waste a lot of money on Oreo cookie lawyers to reject our demand for consular access? If it was that irrelevant, why even file an objection to remove admissibility of Indian demand for consular access? Par dil behelane ke liye, khayal Accha hai bhai lol...

You must have serious problems with your eyes! The ICJ rejected 3 key violations that Pakistani contingent claimed against India. Pakistani claim was that Indian case was inadmissible...It was REJECTED by a vote of 15-1. I suppose that was part of your “post balakot” effect. Lol Nowhere did the...

That’s what will be determined through consular access, the true version of events. Which is why the consular access is so important here. Two corrections: 1. He was a naval officer 2. He wasn’t serving.

That’s a decision Pak made in violation of a treaty it signed and hence we are at this point with the ICJ. Again, those charges of terrorism and links as Pak claims will have to be brought to light openly, unlike the previous decision make by a kangaroo military court.

I have zero background of the case barring the excerpt posted by Eagle. So it’s hard to comment without a point of reference. But sure, I’m not denying that the US is notorious for violating article 36 of the Vienna convention.

Can you explain the point you’re trying to make here? I’m responding to like 10 Posts a minute here and can’t remember exactly what you wrote. If you’re saying KJ is dead ie will be hanged no matter what. That’s something I started out saying that it’s a foregone conclusion. He was dead the...

Issuing an Iranian passport, yes! Who else would issue it? Lol

Ok let’s draw the parallel. How?

Does India issue Iranian passports? Or for that matter does Pakistan? If not, you should know why I wrote that.

I’m sorry but there are no courtesy calls admissible in the court of law unless documented as part of a series of procedures that were followed by a written summary. If you’re claiming to be so well versed in law, you should know that those count for nothing. If anything, it’s a claim, nothing...

Do you really think we are worried about KJs life?! Lol He was dead the minute he made that fake edited confession. Now it’s our job to show just how fake that confession was (not to mention the poor editing job) and shame Pakistan publicly for its sham judicial system and lack of respect for...

Apparently you do. Why else are you here arguing with me? Lol

Shouldn’t the Iranians be asked that?

Apparently you didn’t, so that’s a lie. Else ICJ wouldn’t be making that judgement in our favor. I would hope you know that legal procedures are based in writing, not phone calls to “handlers”. Clearly if that even happened, it’s inadmissable in court. Was this case above referring to spies...