Search results

We had to deal with them even before their refugees came in. They'd keep attacking our country and calling for our destruction. How could we have taken them in to begin with?

If it was by Baloch separatists, bombing them would only escalate the situation. Attacking only on the point of being directly attacked at the moment would be the only time to attack. Baloch separatists need to be licked in negotiation. Bombing them would only aggregate them.

There was an Afghan on Quora who claimed Turks should not be blown up because the air would start to smell like sh!t Imagine an Afghan claiming. I've seen a few hate comments from them directed towards Turks.

Hypothetical scenario. Pakistan threatens Israel. Palestinians: Meantime Israelis:

Even in Europe, these Afghanis are committing more crimes than Arabs and everyone else apparently. An Austrian social worker wrote an article on it. I remember an Afghan troll on YouTube pretending to be Turk. He'd keep insulting Pakistanis and claiming Afghans are white people. If only he knew...

Azerbaijan is definitely pro-Turkey and not pro-Iran, despite being a Shia majority. Pakistan is defiantly more pro-Turkey than pro-Iran aside from the Shia population. Pakistanis will probably beg Iranians and Turks to stop fighting, claiming we belong to one "ummah."

Nobody's claiming it's disputed territory, clown. There are a number of Baloch who in fact want to separate from Pakistan. Believe it or not. Pakistan can stay united regardless of religion. Comedian.

That's because IDF is small on manpower, not bad quality training & equipment.

Yes I know the meaning of Jihad. So why is it that Pakistan is right to take action against separatists, but China not against Uyghur jihadists. And yes I know the meaning of Jihad. When radicals use it, the word means trouble. It means death to kuffars in that context. China has every right...

You got it switched around https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/language-in-the-british-isles/indic-languages/8343FABC094E91986DBD68A492FFEA1B

What proofs? I've met Baloch separatists and argued with them. Their reason to break away from Pakistan has nothing to do with their love for India. They are suffering cultural genocide. The Pak military has also been active in killing and abducting Baloch activists and even their uninvolved...

There have been attacks on their facilities. Iranian rebels are active in the country to overthrow their regime. But they need outside support.

What duty did Pakistan have to a people whom hated it from the start? And why should we help them? Our duty is to help a bunch of foreigner whom hate us? We might as well let a bunch of Bharatis come and live in Pakistan.

Not before Iran's nuke program is annihilated. Once the Iranian regime is overthrown, there will be no excuse for the Saudis to engage in these proxy wars.

They're reserved to be built on the moon lol

And they're probably select pornsters. Not an actual representation.

Much more substantiated than your Balochistan theory. Basically when separatism arises in your country, it's an Indian conspiracy. But when it arises in another country, it's legitimate. Nice argument.

By West and India.

From what I know the Chinese are mostly into their own kind.

The Indians are a population of over a billion. Of course you'll find a diversity of opinions.