What's new

Search results

  1. A.P. Richelieu

    'The Strength of the Hijab

    That does not explain why women are harassed or killed for not wearing Hijab. Islamists tried that in Bosnia and got kicked out, Being present, is not a reason for a statue. There is a reason why the interest for statues of Oswald Mosley, Lord Haw-Haw and Adolf Hitler is l8mit3d in the UK...
  2. A.P. Richelieu

    France not to allow women to wear abayas in schools: Minister

    Because we think society works better this way. you can have sexual relations without marrying. You are not told what you may have for breakfast.
  3. A.P. Richelieu

    France not to allow women to wear abayas in schools: Minister

    Marriage is a legal matter, and that is where the governments believe it has a role. It does not believe it should regulate sexual behaviour. Grown-ups in the West can handle that themselves. Muslims like yourself, apparently needs to be told what to do and not to do.
  4. A.P. Richelieu

    Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

    Todays spot pricing in Sweden. Highest is 0,06 SEK or $0,0054 / kWh. During the night You get paid for using energy….
  5. A.P. Richelieu

    France not to allow women to wear abayas in schools: Minister

    I know how things in Sweden work, but I don’t care what you think about this issue. I am offering you a way to see the counterargument. Take it or leave it. It is not a real law, simply how people react to assholes,
  6. A.P. Richelieu

    France not to allow women to wear abayas in schools: Minister

    Laws in Sweden are never enacted without a study. So do your research. That is the ”Law of Jante”, which I did not make up.
  7. A.P. Richelieu

    France not to allow women to wear abayas in schools: Minister

    We do not need a ”real argument” presented at PDF to ban polygamy. We base it our own studies which point to polygamy being a bad thing. if you want to dig into the details, you can self-study. That is the UK. In Sweden, it is illegal. Noone cares about your point in Sweden. Actually the full...
  8. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    You apparently have no intention to provide valuable contributions to the thread. Keep posting, but I will not be reading…
  9. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    Conspiracy theorist keeps denying Al-Qaeda’s statements and claim that they really know what happened, and they have a cousin that found the real story written on the stomach of a rabbit they shot - which they unfortunately lost afterwards, or similar.
  10. A.P. Richelieu

    Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

    Looks like it overshot the target...
  11. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    This is clear evidence to everyone with a sane mind. Even better evidence is the fact that after this was published, Al-Qaeda did not question its authentity. As You ignore anything that does not fit your agenda, further discussion is meaningless. Therefore our discussion is at an end.
  12. A.P. Richelieu

    Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

    https://www.quora.com/profile/Elena-Gold-3 What are the current Russian losses? The Russian authorities accidentally admitted their losses: the Russian government ordered 230 thousand certificates for the families of those killed in the war. This was an additional printout to 30,000 “death...
  13. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    OBL: ”The brothers who conducted the operation, all they knew was they have a martyrdom operation And we asked each of them to go to America but they didn’t know anything about the operation, not even one letter. But they were trained and we did not reveal the operation to them until they are...
  14. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    Except Usama bin Laden claiming that the attack was made by Al-Qaeda of course. ”The brothers who conducted the operation, all they knew was they have a martyrdom operation And we asked each of them to go to America but they didn’t know anything about the operation, not even one letter. But...
  15. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    Talk to the hand (but showing more than the finger might be considered offensive). So much for ”Indian”… It is not. Another fail... This is about Afghanistan and nothing else. @LeGenD, can you please clean up the deflections and insulting posts by @Trango Towers . This post can be removed as...
  16. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    I guess you should read the thread from the beginning. Al-Qaeda declared war on the US in the mid 1990s. They attacked US Embassies and USS Cole and the US replied by attacking Al-Qaeda bases inside Afghanistan with Cruise Missiles. After that, (in 1998) Pakistan and SaudiArabia tried to...
  17. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    Yep, that is the default fallback of Pakistanis that lack arguments. Calling someone Indian. The US provided funds and arms, and Pakistan 100% controlled how they were used in Afghanistan during the Soviet-Afghan War. That is the claim by ISI. I guess you consider ISI a pack of liars. As for...
  18. A.P. Richelieu

    Why Afghanistan lost its neutrality in the War on Terror September 19, 1998

    If he was funded, trained and armed, that was because Pakistan did it. However, one of the major reasons OBL made a name for himself is because he was filthy rich and could pay for the upkeep of Arabs in Afghanistan. The Mujahedin was funded, trained and armed by Pakistan. The US supplied the...
Back
Top Bottom