Search results

there is some ruling in the Khawaja Asif case where SC directed the govt to appoint professionals using a transparent consultative process. But this was when PMLN was in opposition. since now they are in the govt, (i have heard) they are apparently planning to appeal against it. lol

PTI: Imran Khan's delicate stitch! I have often participated in heated ideological debates on the issue related to the foundational principles on which Pakistan was established and how it should be governed. But why is it when it comes to supporting PTI and its political slogan of 'Naya...

but i believe that a professional appointed with a tenure post is the best possible outcome. That is how its supposed to be in Pakistan as per law but interestingly PMLN has a habit of appointing 'acting chairmen' rather than full time person with a fixed tenure.

PTI: Imran Khan's delicate stitch! I have often participated in heated ideological debates on the issue related to the foundational principles on which Pakistan was established and how it should be governed. But why is it when it comes to supporting PTI and its political slogan of 'Naya...

there is a thing called professionals who are appointed as heads of regulatory bodies in the modern world. They are not acting chairmen who could be manoeuvred according to the political desires.

is there any other leader out these who teaches their followers like this?

عمران خان نے خیبر پختونخواہ میں کیا کر لیا ہے؟ چوری تو کچھ وقفے سے ہوئی تھیں پر اتفاق سے دونوں گاڑیاں ایک ہفتے کے فرق سے مل گئیں. دونوں مالکوں کا تعلق پنجاب سے ہے. ایک کو پشاور سے فون آیا کہ جناب آپ کی گاڑی ہم نے پکڑی ہے تو آپ یہاں آ کر وصول کر لیں. جب یہ صاحب پشاور پہنچے تو ضروری کروائی کے بعد...

the issue is not of GEO or ARY. The issue is about autonomous regulatory body. Why is PMLN government (and so was PPP) so scared to appoint full time professionals as heads of these regulatory bodies? Why is every other regulatory body working only under 'acting chairman'? its a horrible state...

ya i heard najam sethi say that after PTI's jalsa. but thats not correct. i could not see enough containers anywhere in the video which may give the perception that the crowd area was reduced.

awesome. no compromise of accountability!

The total area of Minar-e-Pak ground on which PAT jalsa was arranged is around 56,000 m. square. If you leave the side areas and the pathways which were left untouched by the PAT management, the crowd area will be around 50,000 m. square. The crowd density (as per my observation) was between 2...

maybe but then the argument should be against the corporate financing of political activities. Bilawal using Malik Riaz's helicopter doesnt look wrong to me if we stick with the existing principles. All parties are one way or the other getting their financing by private individuals and...

'woh bhutto ki qurbani cash karanay ka haqq rakhti hain' uff Allah.. yeh Bhutto koon sa account khool gya hay jo khutam he nai ho raha lol

the evidence for muk-muka keeps coming lol always trying to feed the perception of each others' popularity only to oppose PTI the jalsa was held with the aim of tainting PTI's increasing popular base. but it only exposed their own weakness. one month of preparation and hardly 1 lac people...

which report is this? is it being confused with this earlier report: 11 of the 17 constituencies opened saw a re-election. 5 of the 17 saw partial re-election. Indeed this wasnt a random sample. But if this is the level of discrepancy which has come forward then why not have a random sample...

ah! thats a better estimation strategy.. i like how split the area. being more dynamic than wat i was doing. but 0 for the last quarter is too much on the downside lol. keep it 1 for the last 50% so 80,000 basically

you are right. 1 lac if we want to be generous enough

ya. i have tried to cut that out in my earlier post. the green area leaves out the stage area and the empty part infront of it. the area of the green part is 56,000 m. square.