Search results

where in law is this distinction of only asking civilian agencies for assistance and not the military ones? Its not a political issue. Its a Judicial Invesitigation which allows for the JC to be assisted by any state institution.

You are asking for something which is not needed. Where does the law say that NADRA has anything to do with vote verification? It doesnt say any such thing because it is not needed. Any institution can ask any other institution for assistance towards fulfiling its mandate.

its not a political issue. Its a matter of investigating into pre and post election rigging. Once JC gets the legal cover to probe into it, there is nothing stopping any other institution from assisting the JC in completing its task. Where does it say that other state institutions are not...

they have a role in all sorts of investigation in order to assist the Judicial Commission (JC) once the JC has been provided the legal cover to investigate into this matter. like i said before, JIT itself does not have the real mandate which only belongs to the JC. This is similar to NADRA...

best news of the day! i hope they are proactive in their functioning

[PTI's Press Statement on Convenient Amnesia of the Government] Central Information Secretary PTI, Dr Shireen Mazari, today regretted that despite a detailed exposition by Chairman Imran Khan yesterday on the PTI position on a Judicial Commission to probe the May 2013 electoral rigging and the...

thank God we have people like you to teach us our political history.

so why didnt the ppl in the NA supported the tax audit resolution? even the PTI ppl would have got what they deserved! and again: Govt and PTI had already agreed on the composition of the JIT during their talks. The only issue was of PM resignation. Now that this demand has been accepted, why...

statements statements and more statements

tell ur govt to start making the tax evaders accountable. Why is it when Asad Umer took a resolution for conducting a tax audit of every MNA in the NA, no other party supported it?

JIT is meant to assist the Judicial Commission (JC) as the JC deems fit. And I fail to see what legal problem is there in composing a JIT with members from different agencies in it. Secondly, Govt and PTI had already agreed on the composition of the JIT during their talks. Hence, there is...

"Comprising 10 members, the JIT team is headed by Additional Inspector General Special Branch Dr Arif Mushtaq Chaudhry. The other nine members include representatives of the ISI, MI, IB, police, Special Branch and Counterterrorism Department." Model Town clash: JIT report suggests police FIR be...

Dr. Qadri didnt even own the Judicial Commission (JC) nominated by the Govt. Secondly, JIT has nothing to do with democracy or killing but only with investigating the matter as directed by the Judicial Commission. Its simple duplicity on part of the Govt and the so called 'intellectuals' that...

agreed. my 2 cents to what you have said above will be: lack of legal means should also not be allowed to become an obstacle and in any such scenario legal frameworks must be improved to achieve justice.

agreed. as long as it gets done

sure. I dont have any problem how it gets served as long as it gets served. Im all for legal consistency and dont have any problem with the amendment if it is determined that Ordinance is not enough. But surely you and I cannot determine it here, ryt? unless you are a constitutionalist which...

this thread should be merged with PTI offers commission under Supreme Court assisted by J.I.T while PM remains in seat. @Horus

Well that is for the constitutionalists to determine. I am sure both the sides will (or already have) consider this factor. My concern, as a citizen, is that the 'overall' validity of the 2013 elections is investigated. Ordinance or an Amendment is of little concern to me as long as justice is...

The matter of Ordinance is already agreed upon by both the sides (during the course of their earlier talks) and no one (including those in the legal fraternity) has said that this cannot be done. I, myself, am not a lawyer and do not know why it cannot be done unless you show me an opinion of...

there is no army involvement. Having members of ISI and MI in the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) is no new thing and there is nothing wrong with it. No one had any problem when such a team was constituted by the govt few months back. ["Comprising 10 members, the JIT team is headed by Additional...