What's new

Capable of countering new-age Chinese jets, Rafale will give us edge: Air Chief Marshal BS Dhanoa

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
SOURCE: ET

bs-dhanoa-air-force-chief-pti.jpg


India is capable of countering new generation Chinese fighters and is creating new infrastructure on the border to boost capabilities, including a new fighter jet base in east Ladakh, Air Chief Marshal BS Dhanoa tells Economic Times in a wide ranging interview. The air chief feels that the Make in India initiative will arm the air force against future threats and has confidence in the abilities of the private sector to deliver. Excerpts:

What is your assessment on the capability of the two fifth generation Chinese fighter jets?
We have some of the latest aircraft in our inventory positioned in our eastern sector to tackle our adversary’s air power. The Chinese 5th generation aircraft have just been tested out and it will take time for them to realise their full potential. Our air defence architecture is capable of detecting intrusions and have the requisite combat assets, ground and air to counter the threat from them. With the acquisition of the Rafale, our capability in terms of combat air assets will vastly improve and will be in a position to greatly increase the asymmetry in combat potential over the adversary. We are also in the process of building our capacities to acquire more state of art combat and combat support assets. A substantial portion of this would be procured through the ‘Make in India’ route.

What are the Air Force plans for augmentation of infrastructure in the border areas?
Our operational capability is dependent on equipment, training, procedures, infrastructure availability and plans based on our analysis of the adversary. We have quite a few bases in our eastern sector operating frontline squadrons. These bases are being modernised with the latest facilities to undertake fullscale operations. Special shelters are being build over these structures to provide for passive air defence and they are progressing at a fast pace. On the northern front, trial landings by transport aircraft have been carried out by our aircraft at Nyoma air base and its development into a fighter aircraft base is part of the IAF’s plan in the near future.

India is looking at partnering a private player for a new fighter jet line under the Make in India plan. What kind of technology is being looked at?
The main objective of Make in India initiative in aerospace sector is not only to manufacture these aircraft in the country but to harness key technologies essential for manufacturing defence equipment in the country. The technology capability transfer being sought is to enable us to unilaterally design develop and manufacture top of the line fighter aircraft in the country. This will have multiple spinoffs -technology infusion will boost the R&D sector, is likely to revive some of the stagnated design and development projects and will also assist in future fighter development programmes.

The air force has been looking at force enhancers. What mix of capability enhancers are planned in coming years?
We already have three AWACS aircraft on the IL-76 platform operational and a case for the procurement of two additional AWACS is at CCS (Cabinet Committee on Security) approval stage. The flight trials for indigenous AEW&C aircraft is in the final stages and the system is likely to be inducted soon. Apart from these, DRDO has chalked out a roadmap for development of indigenous AWACS on Airbus A330 platform and we expect the first two indigenous AWACS to be inducted in the IAF by 2025. IAF was pursuing the case for Flight Refueller Aircraft (FRA). After the withdrawal of RFP, we are now exploring available options in order to ensure that this critical capability is available to us in the earliest possible timeframe.

The Indian industry has some capacity to manufacture aerial bombs and other ammunition domestically, would the air force look at them as a source?
Procurement of weapons has a recurring cost and indigenisation in the field of weapons is one of the priorities of IAF. IAF is closely involved in design and development of weapons undertaken by DRDO and we also carry out flight trials of all these weapons. We have identified certain weapons that can be designed and manufactured by the private sector.

One criticism is that the F-16 jets being offered to India are similar to the ones being operated by Pakistan. Is this a matter of concern?
At present, there is no case for procurement of the F-16 aircraft under process. However, the F-16 jets offered to India during the bids for 126 MMRCA were more advanced than the versions being operated by PAF. There are significant differences in the two variants and the one offered to India by Lockheed Martin have superior capabilities. This was not a matter of concern during the selection process.


http://idrw.org/capable-of-counteri...ill-give-us-edge-air-chief-marshal-bs-dhanoa/
 
The Rafale is a capable 4+ generation aircraft in and of itself, and perhaps further augmented by its long-range AAMs such as the Meteor and ASCMs such as the SCALP. However, it would have to contend with no less than 100+ J-10B/C, 24+ J-16, and J-11D, all of comparable performance.

Spectra will fry the radars of Chinese jets.

That's not how SPECTRA works. How exactly will it cancel out beams from AESA radars when the latter cycles through frequencies almost simultaneously?
 
Just 36 is not enough to counter the massive fleet of Chinese gen4 fighters,now if somebody says j20 is less survivable against rafale,I will show them my middle finger.
 
At present, there is no case for procurement of the F-16 aircraft under process.
With the acquisition of the Rafale, our capability in terms of combat air assets will vastly improve and will be in a position to greatly increase the asymmetry in combat potential over the adversary.
A substantial portion of this would be procured through the ‘Make in India’ route.

i think ACM is subtly hinting at something. More Rafales are definitely coming.
@Abingdonboy

However, it would have to contend with no less than 100+ J-10B/C, 24+ J-16, and J-11D, all of comparable performance.
Correct assessment.
Rafale, no doubt is in a different league, but in a war planning scenario you have to contend with attrition and opposite numerical superiority. Hence one needs to increase own inventory, may be not matching number to number but certainly in some logical proportion.
 
i think ACM is subtly hinting at something. More Rafales are definitely coming.
@Abingdonboy


Correct assessment.
Rafale, no doubt is in a different league, but in a war planning scenario you have to contend with attrition and opposite numerical superiority. Hence one needs to increase own inventory, may be not matching number to number but certainly in some logical proportion.

Rafales will not operate in isolation, rather they will compliment the Sukhoi 30s in air superiority duties. In 'sufficient" numbers (combined i.e.) the combo will be a handful for any adversary.
Ofcourse, 'sufficient' numbers is the key though, as a portion of the inventory will also be dedicated for strike roles.
In my opinion, minimum of 30 squadrons of MKIs and Rafales are needed to maintain a effective offensive posture on our eastern border.
In the case of breakout of hostilities the shit will hit the fan very quickly and the one who mobilises and reinforce numbers quickly and effectively will hold the edge.
 
Ugh just buy those 126 Rafale that you needed for your squadron shortfall back in 2001.

Don't wait until 2017 and then decide to order only 36 Rafale for almost the same cost... take more responsibility for protecting your nation.
There vast difference BTW the capabilities of MMRCA Rafale and One we Procuring Either Yo dumb or you are Acting Like one And It Is coming Some Add on's One of Which Is Meteor BVR
 
Ugh just buy those 126 Rafale that you needed for your squadron shortfall back in 2001.

Don't wait until 2017 and then decide to order only 36 Rafale for almost the same cost... take more responsibility for protecting your nation.
So Indians now realize they have two enemies: China and Pakistan. lol.
 
i think ACM is subtly hinting at something. More Rafales are definitely coming.
@Abingdonboy


Correct assessment.
Rafale, no doubt is in a different league, but in a war planning scenario you have to contend with attrition and opposite numerical superiority. Hence one needs to increase own inventory, may be not matching number to number but certainly in some logical proportion.

I personally do not think 36 Rafales could tip the balance of airpower in India's favor to a significant extent, mostly because the Chinese are producing aircraft that are more or less comparable to the Rafale performance-wise (i.e. J-10C & advanced Flankers) at full speed. What India needs to do besides purchasing the Rafale (or increasing the quantity) is to upgrade or build newer variants of existing fighters; the Super Sukhoi upgrade program is a good start but the MiG-29s and other platforms could use a refurbishing as well.
 
India can never fight a two front war against China and Pakistan.
 
Good luck ;), its impossible to win a two front war.

Look at Germany during the two world wars.:enjoy:

No one said it is going to be easy, but we have to prepare for any eventuality. All one can do is be prepared and fight with honor.

Besides, if you think about it, 71 was a two front war. It just wasn't with two different countries (at least not at that point in time)
 
Good luck ;), its impossible to win a two front war.

Look at Germany during the two world wars.:enjoy:

We will fight till the end. Just cos the prospect of 2 front war doesnt mean we will submit to any eventuality. Its not easy job invading India. Again we can "defend" against 2 enemies with respect to army. But AF, it will get tough.
 
CAC and SAC is working at their full speed but still yet to fulfill the need of PLAAF and PLAN.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom