India 'incomplete' without Pakistan's Sindh: BJP patriarch LK Advani

Kamikaze Pilot · Jan 18, 2017

Devil Soul said:
India 'incomplete' without Sindh: LK Advani
By News Desk
Published: January 16, 2017
15SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL

L.K. Advani. PHOTO: REUTERS

Former deputy prime minister of India LK Advani on Sunday lamented that Karachi and Sindh are not a part of India.

Reminiscing about his birth place, Karachi, the 89-year-old said, “At times I feel sad that Karachi and Sindh are not parts of India anymore. I was very active in RSS during my childhood days in Sindh. It is matter of dismay. I believe that India appears incomplete without Sindh.”

Chrysanthemum show: ‘Karachi is now a city of flowers’

Advani was speaking at the 48th ascension anniversary of spiritual leader Pitashri Brahma. The leader also praised Brahma’s organisation for according importance to women and placing them in high positions in its hierarchy. “I have not seen any other organisation like this which is mainly led by women. It is really amazing. I have been associated with one organisation for years and respect it. I humbly tell anyone who meets me to learn from them,” he said.

Sindh became part of Pakistan during the 1947 partition of the sub-continent. It is Pakistan’s third largest province and shares borders with India’s Gujrat and Rajasthan states.

This article originally appeared on the Deccan Chronicle.

Finer · Jan 18, 2017

To further the goal of Akhand Bharat, they might end up losing to Greater Pakistan [Entire India in It]. There is the reason why Pakistan is the reality to begin with.

newb3e · Jan 18, 2017

Take sindh ki shaan Bhuttos and Zardari and youll feel part of sindh

MilSpec · Jan 18, 2017

IceCold said:
Ok what? Please re read my post and than the link you posted which is about Myanmar. Is Myanmar in India? I asked you to show me where Pakistan other than Kashmir rose similar issues of Human rights violation in integral parts of India? Pakistan talks about Kashmir because its disputed India on the other hand talked about Baluchistan which isnt. Learn the difference. One is integral part while the other is an internationally recognized dispute.
Now another one of your leaders talk about Sindh. So when you try to portray it as a personal opinion of Advani you conveniently forget that it is not just opinion of one man but rather the whole BJP who have long advocated the same and so it does not matter whether its Advani or Modi, as long as Indian intentions remains the same your constitution is not worth the paper its written upon.
PS its funny that Indians like to compare situation in Baluchistan with Rohingya. I mean its rich coming from you lot talking about human rights violation.

This is your logic. Because you raise human rights issue in a region, then you must be fostering terrorism in that region. I don't blame you given Pakistan's conduct in Kashmir and Punjab, that is the natural conclusion you would be able to draw.

Unfortunately that is not the case, when you draw attention to human rights in a region, you are doing exactly the same. Rich or not, it was a very simple counter to tell Pakistan to cater to it's own integral part before crying wolf for Kashmir.

Talwar e Pakistan · Jan 18, 2017

AshishDelhi said:
next 5 years we will have stronger fence/concrete structure.

Which will fall just like the Berlin Wall

abcxyz0000 said:

Not in India. In India, dreams transform into movies

Acknowledge said:
According to you..a country that defines itself as Islamic Republic, has a State religion. Has religious laws encoded as national laws, sets legal requirements on who can become the Prime Minister and President based on his religious affiliation..is not a theocratic state ?

You may want Pakistan not to be a theocratic state, but it is very much so.

Unfortunately Pakistan is only a theocratic state on paper and not in reality.

IceCold · Jan 19, 2017

MilSpec said:
This is your logic. Because you raise human rights issue in a region, then you must be fostering terrorism in that region. I don't blame you given Pakistan's conduct in Kashmir and Punjab, that is the natural conclusion you would be able to draw.

Unfortunately that is not the case, when you draw attention to human rights in a region, you are doing exactly the same. Rich or not, it was a very simple counter to tell Pakistan to cater to it's own integral part before crying wolf for Kashmir.

Than the joke is on you since the embarrassment this caused to Modi and his India was astounding since not even your closed aides bought this BS. As for crying wolf rest assured we will continue to raise voice over Kashmir since is not Indian territory rather being illegally occupied by your forces. There is no comparison to being with. Pakistan is not holding Baluchistan illegally.

MilSpec · Jan 19, 2017

IceCold said:
Than the joke is on you since the embarrassment this caused to Modi and his India was astounding since not even your closed aides bought this BS. As for crying wolf rest assured we will continue to raise voice over Kashmir since is not Indian territory rather being illegally occupied by your forces. There is no comparison to being with. Pakistan is not holding Baluchistan illegally.

Well it is astounding that there is such comprhension issue.

Raising human rights issue in Balochistan, uganda, Mynamar, or elsewhere does not mean the following:
1>We dispute sovereignty of the said region
2>We intend to support insurgents in the said region
3>We claim the region as our own
4>We intend to change climate in the said region
5>We intend to breed Penguins, tigers, Lions, Cheetahs , taliban, athiests, homomsexuals, seculars, literates or any other endangered species in the said region.

It means just as we said it, raising concerns for human rights violation, very well documented in your domestic media as well as international media.

Hell Raiser · Jan 29, 2017

Śakra said:
Sindh is in our anthem.

There are stars and a moon in mine, do i have a claim on those?

TMA · Jan 30, 2017

Osiris said:
Because hinduism, Budhism and sikhism are indigenous to Indian subcontinent.

The vast majority of Pakistanis are native to her lands (even though many of them falsely claim foreign blood due to dislike of idol worship). Their ancestors just accepted Islam over the centuries bygone. This does not make them foreigners or non indigenous. They have as much right to the "Land of the Indus" as do the followers of Ramdev have to the "Land of the Ganges".

Shajida Khan · Jan 30, 2017

BABA AGHORI said:
ahhhh,,,, so you never heard of Akhand Bharat ?

holy cow! you have said the a-word now

HAIDER · Jan 30, 2017

Devil Soul said:
India 'incomplete' without Sindh: LK Advani
By News Desk
Published: January 16, 2017
15SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL

L.K. Advani. PHOTO: REUTERS

Former deputy prime minister of India LK Advani on Sunday lamented that Karachi and Sindh are not a part of India.

Reminiscing about his birth place, Karachi, the 89-year-old said, “At times I feel sad that Karachi and Sindh are not parts of India anymore. I was very active in RSS during my childhood days in Sindh. It is matter of dismay. I believe that India appears incomplete without Sindh.”

Chrysanthemum show: ‘Karachi is now a city of flowers’

Advani was speaking at the 48th ascension anniversary of spiritual leader Pitashri Brahma. The leader also praised Brahma’s organisation for according importance to women and placing them in high positions in its hierarchy. “I have not seen any other organisation like this which is mainly led by women. It is really amazing. I have been associated with one organisation for years and respect it. I humbly tell anyone who meets me to learn from them,” he said.

Sindh became part of Pakistan during the 1947 partition of the sub-continent. It is Pakistan’s third largest province and shares borders with India’s Gujrat and Rajasthan states.

This article originally appeared on the Deccan Chronicle.

marso marso Sindh na dasoo ........................ lolz

ghazi52 · Jan 30, 2017

XDescendantX · Jan 31, 2017

Osiris said:
Your language, your province, your history !! ... this wasn't even your land, you were invaders.
Islam is not even indigenous to go Indian subcontinent, so go ask for your rights in Arabian desserts.

Since Kashmir is part of India, so Pakistan shouldn't be having in 'K' in its name, just like you are suggesting, India, shouldn't have Sindh in its Anthem.

Pakistanis came from the Indus Valley Civilization located on the Indus River in Pakistan. So how are we invaders?

Pakistan First · Jan 31, 2017

Let it remain in the anthem and stop worrying my bhindian neighbours. Your worries will be all over in near future. We'll take care of all of you like we did for a 1000 years.

PakistaniNawab · Apr 10, 2017

Home
India news
Pakistan’s Sindh not part of India, L K Advani says this makes him sad; here’s why

Pakistan’s Sindh not part of India, L K Advani says this makes him sad; here’s why
A part of India, where I was born before partition was separated after India's independence: LK Advani
By: FE Online | New Delhi | Published: April 10, 2017 2:00 PM
Shares

Senior BJP Minister LK Advani. (ANI)
An event that was also attended by Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed saw a nostalgic former deputy prime minister of India and senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader LK Advani say that Sindh, which is in Pakistan, is not a part of India today and that this fact makes him sad. While addressing the India Foundation Awareness Programme in Delhi alongside the Bangladesh PM, Lal Krishna Advani said, “Kisi desh ka naam nahi lena chahunga par Asia mein bhi kayi desh hain jinke saath sambandh sehaj ho jaayein to mujhe khushi hogi.” (I would not like to name any country in particular, but I will be happy if a balanced relationship is maintained with them)

He further talked about his birthplace and said, “A part of India, where I was born before partition was separated after India’s independence.” He then expressed his grief over the separation of Sindh from India and said, “The fact that Sindh is not part of India today makes me sad.”

Watch the video here-

https://twitter.com/x/status/851310080175865857

The partition of India took place before the British rule ended and the country acquired Independence after a long freedom struggle was waged forcing the foreign occupiers to leave led to the formation of Pakistan and Sindh became a part of it – of course, during the 1971 war with Pakistan, India helped liberate East Pakistan, which became Bangladesh after atrocities were committed on a large scale against the population there. Sindh region was extremely popular and much in the news during those days but now much less so. However, what made Advani rue the fact that the area was under Pakistan are his close previous links with it.

Search

India 'incomplete' without Pakistan's Sindh: BJP patriarch LK Advani

Kamikaze Pilot

BANNED

Finer

SENIOR MEMBER

newb3e

BANNED

MilSpec

ELITE MEMBER

Talwar e Pakistan

SENIOR MEMBER

IceCold

PDF VETERAN

MilSpec

ELITE MEMBER

Hell Raiser

FULL MEMBER

TMA

SENIOR MEMBER

Shajida Khan

BANNED

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

XDescendantX

FULL MEMBER

Pakistan First

FULL MEMBER

PakistaniNawab

FULL MEMBER

Similar threads

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts