What's new

Nawaz forbidden from making speech in Davos due to corruption investigation

The point is that leaders at Davos think that the Army is a more effective partner to work with for their own goals. That is all, and my meaning is very clear.
Point is, who has competency. If only the head of govt was any better in running the country, he wouldn't have to face such humiliation. Lol the bald loser can't say a word without holding a script in his hand and even then he has hard time reading it
 
He is shameproof
Never saw a father using his daughter as a tool to get away from corruption scandals but Nawaz Shareef is exception

I'm so ashamed of myself voting him was not right decision in 2013 elections
 
Call it competence, or call it being a better partner for foreign powers. Two sides of the same coin, perhaps? After all, foreign powers would want to spend their resources on those best suited to support their own goals, right?
 
Last edited:
Point 1 = Not invited but still went
Point 2 = Stopped from giving a speech
Point 3 = Wasted tax-payers money
Point 4 = Except Sri Lanka Prime Minister everyone else refused to meet with him.
Point 5 = Ex-COAS was received warmly while PM was sidelined.

Koi Sharam hoti hai, koi hiya hoti hai. Apni izzat ka lehaz nahi hai to Watan ki izzat ka tu lehaz karta. Yaar es Kuttay sai kub jaan churay gi.
 
Point 5 = Ex-COAS was received warmly while PM was sidelined.

So when NS is received warmly by Modi, he becomes an Indian agent, but when the leaders at Davos receive the ex-COAS warmly, it becomes something different? :D
 
So when NS is received warmly by Modi, he becomes an Indian agent, but when the leaders at Davos receive the ex-COAS warmly, it becomes something different? :D

Modi, the butcher of Gujrat, the warmonger PM of India who is busy trying to hurt Pakistan, but he is very happy to greet NS and even comes over to attend his grand-daughters wedding, hmmmm why is that?
 
Does anyone think that the leaders congregating at Davos are angels? They honor only those who serve them, plain and simple.
 
If the leaders at Davos prefer an ex-COAS over an elected PM (no matter which party) from Pakistan, that alone tells you what suits their own interests better. Corruption in a third world country does not bother them, but they do need effective instruments to support their policies.
Elected doesn't mean you are "saved" or something, it just means majority stupid and illiterate people voted for you. Secondly COAS being an instrument for Westerners is a conjecture, ex-COAS rose up through the rigor of a meritocratic institution and most definitely takes decision according to what he deems as national interests. And isn't he retired now?
 
So is that the reason that NS was dying to go there, so that he can serve them?

So what could be a similar reason for the ex-COAS to go there, possibly?
 
So what could be a similar reason for the ex-COAS to go there, possibly?

That is not the answer to my question. Plus RS is an ex-COAS, he has no power to make/do any changes but he was invited to participate in discussions on eliminating terrorism. Just watch his discussions they are all available on youtube
 
he was invited to participate in discussions on eliminating terrorism.

Oh yes, that's right. What better way to say "thank you" for his service.
 

Back
Top Bottom