What's new

Z-10 & Z-19 Combat Helicopter News & Discussion

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 4, 2011
46,068
-5
90,093
Country
China
Location
China
Huh how is this new? From what I'm seeing its still having to turn his head along with the gun. Don't see him just moving his eyes only and the gun tracks as well.

No one said it's new, its a standard equipment for decades, the op one could be an upgraded one with more up to date high tech elements involved.
 

Oldman1

ELITE MEMBER
May 28, 2011
9,121
-1
4,119
Country
United States
Location
United States
No one said it's new, its a standard equipment for decades, the op one could be an upgraded one with more up to date high tech elements involved.

Well then go check the poster who claims it is. I can quote him.

"I am sure it's new. AA missile is using infra heat sensor to lock onto target where sky is clear, easy to pick up target.

While this is using geometry position and sensitivity of the user to rapidly position the gun to where he wanted. They are both different concept. Feel free to prove your point by demostrate similar such weapon from US or European. I dare to say, Chinese is first to put it into operation. "
 

That Guy

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Mar 29, 2013
12,476
40
16,501
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Isn't US all along been fighting militants and rugged Taliban for recent past 20 years?

While squash rioters is last 30 years. So your assessment is wrong.

Yes, US weapon need to fight light armed militant.
Bad logic. These weapons may be used against insurgents, but that was not their primary purpose. Tanks, helicopters and fighter jets are meant to be used against conventional armies. Against insurgents, it's like using a machine gun to kill an ant, it works, but it's impractical.
 

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 17, 2013
27,739
25
18,998
Country
United States
Location
United States
Bad logic. These weapons may be used against insurgents, but that was not their primary purpose. Tanks, helicopters and fighter jets are meant to be used against conventional armies. Against insurgents, it's like using a machine gun to kill an ant, it works, but it's impractical.

Please don't try talking logically to Chinese posters..you aren't going to get far.
Isn't US all along been fighting militants and rugged Taliban for recent past 20 years?

While squash rioters is last 30 years. So your assessment is wrong.

Yes, US weapon need to fight light armed militant.

Oh I'm sorry...you mean your old strategy was to use them to squash civilian rioters but in the last 30 years you have switched to non-civilians...good to know you have changed focus.
 
Last edited:

Globenim

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2011
3,671
-4
6,302
Country
China
Location
Thailand
How do you achieved 90 degrees bore sight using eyeball if u are not moving your head?
He moves his head = its not real eyetracking China bad
He doesnt move his head = the system doesnt support full visual range/bore sight China bad

Coping U.S. posters just acting like dumb clowns for the sake of trolling as usual. This pest is like creationist that just bend reality and read nonsensical bullshit inbetween the lines however they want to always come to the same dumb "conclusion" no matter what and how many contradictings facts they face and flaws in their "logic" have been called out.
 
Last edited:

MajesticPug

FULL MEMBER
Jan 29, 2021
386
-8
571
Country
China
Location
United States
He moves his head = its not real eyetracking China bad
He doesnt move his head = the system doesnt support full visual range/bore sight China bad

Coping U.S. posters just acting like dumb clowns for the sake of trolling as usual. This pest is like creationist that just bend reality and read nonsensical bullshit inbetween the lines however they want to always come to the same dumb "conclusion" no matter what and how many contradictings facts they face and flaws in their "logic" have been called out.

American posters troll either "The Chinese copied our techs" OR "The Chinese only want to suppress the riot". Did they forget Trump ordered American military helicopters flying low to 'scare' the rioters (if the blades cut off some heads, these heads are terrorists)? Oh, wait. That's allowed in the American narratives but any other country doing it is against humanity, freedom, democracy, and downright genocide.
 

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 17, 2013
27,739
25
18,998
Country
United States
Location
United States
He moves his head = its not real eyetracking China bad
He doesnt move his head = the system doesnt support full visual range/bore sight China bad

Coping U.S. posters just acting like dumb clowns for the sake of trolling as usual. This pest is like creationist that just bend reality and read nonsensical bullshit inbetween the lines however they want to always come to the same dumb "conclusion" no matter what and how many contradictings facts they face and flaws in their "logic" have been called out.

Or maybe the title is the typical Chinese hyperbole (to get non-tech savy people excited) that doesn't match the facts.
Eyesight tracking...really...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom