Do you feel inferior when confronting a Chinese or a Gora. Most of the present Pakistanis have the ancestors who were slaves just like we Hindus. Let me reassure you that Hindus are neither inferior nor feel inferior to any other race on this planet.Modi can't face Imran Khan as Pakistan's PM in spite of that. Modi grew pale and fidgety having our health minister on video conference. Inferiority complex you know? Part of Hindu India's DNA and wanting a name that paints a larger than life picture of you guys.
Don't try to be an expert on me.That means No.
I will start fighting. You have time for other threads.
- PRTP GWD
If you dislike my Madressah status, feel free to not read me. If you dislike what I've to say, turn a deaf ear to it.
There's an attempt to derail the discussion from its line of argumentation. Happens when Indians go reality-shy.Do you feel inferior when confronting a Chinese or a Gora. Most of the present Pakistanis have the ancestors who were slaves just like we Hindus. Let me reassure you that Hindus are neither inferior nor feel inferior to any other race on this planet.
Other point which you have raised about Modi growing pale is purely subjective. It appears that IK chickened out as he was afraid of confronting Modi and sent his substitute.
Btw Modi always have an affable meeting with all the world top leaders, most of whom do not consider IK deserves a one to one meet.
Any change in status-quo warrants a reality check. The grandeur adopted by India in its narratives is a direct indicator of its slave past.Now that we know that USSR was not a country, should we talk about "USSR after breaking did a reality check and named itself Russia."
Thank you.And id Mubarak to you
Elephant is 7x bigger than horse. History of India is witness to stately Indian elephants losing to nimble footed Muslim horses.Many Indians say 'Why India does not pay Pakistan back in the same coin?'
Anyway,we are 7times more powerful so if u try to hit once ready to accept 7 slaps in-return and survive.... ALL THE BEST
Horses have a religionElephant is 7x bigger than horse. History of India is a witness to stately Indian elephants being fallen by nimble footed Muslim horses.
Regarding what Indians say, yes we've allowed them to copy us.
The lesson for us Pakistan is peace and progress. So that other nationalities in India (there are 32 of them) associate progress with separation from inept Delhi Hindu rule.
And this is going to come without Pakistan firing a single bullet.
If we play into Delhi's game to repay them in kind ... know that Pakistan is the only factor that unites the otherwise divided India.
Storm is chaotic but certainly there's a sigh of relief when one can predict something by only watching the eye of the storm which is what Pakistani policy makers are doing by not playing into India's hands even though the situation would demand otherwise to a common Pakistani who has bore a lot from last 15-20 years.
I have deliberately omitted some spaces in my description of the problem for thinking minds to weigh in or else it becomes stupendous to elaborate what 'slowly-but-surely' policy of achieving goals of Naya Pakistan entails.
Speaking from Pakistan's POV - a country that has studied only one country in detail since its inception - there must be a reason for Pakistan to refrain from paying India back in the same coin. The point to drive home is that if India being
... does not know how to conduct terrorism, hire proxies to infiltrate the hitherto fence-less border area of its arch rival and create a mayhem here. One needs to be a infant or imbecile to believe that. Sadly majority of Indians think that India is a victim and not a perpetrator of terrorism in the region.
- A nation of 1.3 billion
- World's largest democracy with no shortage of strategists
- Plenty of monetary wealth
- $70 billion in defense budget
- Her retired army men on record to pay estranged groups money to conduct suicide bombing in Pakistan (and it takes PKR 1 million to hire a suicide bombing mission)
- with more than dozen Indian consulates/terror-launch pads in Afghanistan (where only one would have sufficed if it was a legit consulate)
- Idealizing Kautiliya who says make enemies of your enemies your friends
- Haven't refrained from using force of state since day one
- Not new to communal violence
- Knows how to kill Gandhi soon after the country's inception. Knows how to kill Indira Gandhi.
- Openly stating belligerent statement against Pakistan in every election campaign
- Desire to conspire against Pakistan the intent of which is declared, celebrated, and watched with eyes glued to Bollywood content which is the beating pulse of the nation
- Have the silent approval of West now to do whatever against Muslims or Pakistan
- Have diplomatic influence with Afghan & Iran government more than Pakistan has
- Technologically advanced to maintain contacts and pay terrorists money through dark-web, crypto-currency way without leaving a money trail or digital footprint
The above mentioned points are not a praise to India in any way. Pakistani policy makers are weighing their tactics of turning the very strengths of India into its [India's] weaknesses, and this entails not paying India back in the same coin. Let them either respect Pakistan or collapse under their own weight. It seems ahead of time to state that.
No country has benefited from a perpetual warfare (Sun Tzu).
There was a time Pakistan's GDP was ahead of India for many years so much so that India adopted the 'five-years plans' model of developing the economy from Pakistan.
Wars happened thereafter. Pakistan found it impossible to recover from wars.
A mind that's fit for waging war is not fit for running the municipal and day-to-day affairs of a welfare state.
With the madman at the helm of affairs in India who's trained in old fashion warfare since his young RSS days, there is no reason to believe that India's GDP growth rate will not fall if it pressed so hard on perpetuating violence even if it has to be on rival's soil. It happens so automatically.
No country will find resistance at two fronts easy. Pakistan has other options even if peace in Afghanistan isn't achieved. Pakistan can easily frustrate India by supporting Khalistan movement alongside Kashmir's. China can support Mao's. But instead Pakistan offered Kartarpur Corridor to India.
Why do it yourself when your enemy will do it for you? Use your enemies energies against itself. Not yours.
If Pakistan manages to come out clean through all conflicts, and demonstrate to Indian masses that Pakistan is not their enemy, trust me, Indians will take it on each other. Hitherto, we've have not given a chance for them to do so.
The likes of him commit suicide at the end. Seriously.
Or that war is simply boring? And we've had enough of it. Let those who are newbies enjoy it while we explore new dimensions of modern strategy.
Anyways, we're the first in the region to experiment things out. Unlike our neighbors, we put no emphasis on copying.
I don't say that lightly.
RSS was built in reaction to Khudai Khidmagar Movement by Muslims.
India built Air Defense Command after PAF did so.
They recently made an appointment of CDS copying CJSC of Pakistan.
Already copied the 5-years plan way of economic development.
India inducted female fighter pilots copying Pakistan.
They changed the constitutional status of Kashmir after Pakistan changed constitutional status of FATA.
All blames of Baluchistan occupation of Pakistan is based on difficult annexation of independent princely states of Rajasthan continued till late 1960s.
Yes, India gasps for breath when trying to come up with anything original.
Recently India praised ISPR for managing the war frenzy effectively. They might create a Tri-Services Spokesperson for their as an attempt to copy ISPR.
Plus, they might start to wear their flag on left arm of their uniform copying Pakistan.
Wasn't expecting it but they plan to build their parliament on the same footings as Pakistan's. Rajnath returned angry from Pakistan but maybe spoke of Islamabad's natural beauty that Delhi needed to incorporate badly into their capital.
Respect those who you learn from dear kid.
Although a tangential comment from you, this one really deserves a reply. Because you've touched upon a sensitive topic of naming oneself.
How about changing your name from India to something else? Because India was a British colony. And your constitution rightly emphasized your country to be called Bharat. Your country derives name from a river which forms the lifeline of Pakistan. Your national anthem does not have the name of Indus in it. Why not name yourself Gangsters after River Ganga and our Foreign Minister's job is done. Hell, why are you still including the names of two sovereign territories of Pakistan unless you are a revisionist state and want partition to be undone?
This is a further evidence that India copies others. They've yet to come up with an original name for their country. Their transgender goes to this and that country and tell people India & Pakistan used to be once country before independence. W-T-F ?
India was never a country before Pakistan came into being. India was a colony. Repeat it after me:
INDIA WAS A BRITISH COLONY.
No wonder our neighbor is really bad at coming up with something original, with something fresh and that will impress the world.
And don't let me get started on Bollywood, it's gonna destroy the taste of this thread.
What is there for us to copy from Bharat? Enlighten us.
Bharat, the real and new name of Hindu India the country as envisaged in the first line of its constitution.
Just tell us anything that we copy from you. We'll give you credit for that.
That is why they want Pakistan to react, to give credence to their narrative because when their diplomats go to other nations they face critical questions for which Bharat needs data, fresh data which they don't have to substantiate their false claims of terrorism on Pakistan and which is why Pakistan won't give them any such response.
Now failing to obtain such and such a reaction from Pakistan, they are compelled to create false-flag Pathankot, Uri, Pulwama to stuff their own narrative.
To counter this, our diplomats have diligently taken into confidence their counterparts including debreifing P-5 ambassadors whenever such a danger is imminent exposing the formulaic approach of fascist sarkar of Delhi, and how their actions will lead to instability in the region.
It's not for nothing that Hijra PM has once again started to be unwelcome everywhere in the world.
Bharatiya's don't realize it but they are simply obsessed with Pakistan for obvious reasons - their route to glory passes through Pakistan.
Earlier I was hoping that you are wrong. Now I have changed my mind. I am past caring. Not that I want you to be correct. It is just that I have stopped caring either way. Below is the reason.That's really a practical way of thinking. But I'll tell you what's not practical. India was a colony. Indians (Modi answered a US journalist on his visit to Trump in USA) give an impression that their 'country' was divided by Muslims - India never was a country to begin with. That's factually wrong. Jinnah preferred to call partition by Muslims India (Pakistan) & Hindu India (Bharat).
And I tell you what's more practical. Countries, when they make or break do a reality check and change their names accordingly. USSR after breaking did a reality check and named itself Russia. East Pakistan named itself Bangladesh. But India is still India even after imploding. Burma renamed itself to Myanmar because it was called Burma under British rule.
When India does not do a reality check, calls it by a name based on the River Indus forming the lifeline of Pakistan, forgets River Ganga which is included in their national anthem, not declude two sovereign territories of Pakistan from their national anthem to signal a co-existence to its neighbor, the original Pakistan will always be there to thwart India's revisionist and expansionist tendencies as demonstrated by the existence of two countries by 70 years.
On the internet, and outside of it I find it very tiresome to make 'Indians' understand. If one understands, the other doesn't. But Pakistani's aren't worried about anything as long as Indians are not practical or don't do serious thinking except for going where the blowing wind takes them to.
Why the need to give lawmakers data? Why doesn't Pakistan fight India on it's own?Pakistan is doing something by not doing anything - by not responding to Indian terrorism Pakistan is giving the lawmakers around the world data. Void of any data to blame Pakistan has frustrated Indian diplomatic missions, an hence the need for false-flag operations in Kashmir.
Introspect. Who is trying to be an expert on others? For your reference below are excerpts from your own posts.Don't try to be an expert on me
I cant help you prepare for your history exam.
You're a graduate of this
And you need to face basic questions and not dodge them by giving lamest of excuses.You need to learn to formulate questions.
The timing was wrong. India hit back with Israeli attack on Palestine.