What's new

Why CIA drones never target Baitullah or any other Anti-Pakistan militia

MBI Munshi

RETIRED TTA
Apr 8, 2007
8,839
5
5,410
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Bangladesh
Why CIA drones never target Baitullah or any other Anti-Pakistan militia that is committing terrorism against Islamabad

The US is not used to hearing an earful in Islamabad. It usually hands over lists to the leaders. When they do not comply, they are threatened with “we will bomb you to the stone ages” (Musharraf), or “we will make a horrible example of you (Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto), or “we will eliminate you if you do not let us bomb Iran(Liaqat Ali Khan) or “how dare you shut down the US base in Badabare (AyubKhan). Some world and Pakistani leaders who tried to go against the grain paid with their lives.

Liaqat Ali Khan who had negotated a confederatio with King Zahir Shah of Afhanistan, and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto who had pledged himself to making a nuclear bomb were to iconic figures and were actually assassinated. Ayub Khan and Pervez Musharraf had to leave office when they tried to go against their masters. THE PAKISTANI RESILIENCE IN THE FACE OF THREATS: Mountbatten, Nehru, Mohandas Gandhi, Indira, Kruschev, Johnson, Carter, Kissinger, Nixon, Gorbachev, Clinton, Armitage, Bush, Karzai, Vajpayee, Singh have all threatened Pakistan: The Pakistanis are used to it…so what else is new?!! Pakistan’s Nuclear Program should be seen in the backdrop of these threats.

The American were once again reminded of India’s designs in Afghanistan.INDIRA GANDHI to HENRY KISSINGER: “The Northwest Frontier Province belongs to India and the only way to get there is through the Punjab”. .The American message to work with India agasint China was once agine rebutted. The idea of becoming subservient to India is abhorrent and that of cooperation withIndia, withthe object of promoting tension with China, equally repugnant.” Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto

According to Tariq Ali, the current President of Pakistan was coronated because of US largess who wanted a compliant president in Pakistan. General Kiyaniwasthoroughly vetted and he was schmoozed by Washington for about a week recently. With this setup in mind, Mr. Holbrooke, and Admiral Mullen went on an aggressive propoganda campaignto malign the ISI. Somewhere along the way they got lost in their own words and began speaking against the Pakistan Army too. When they arrived in Islamabad, they expected to do some heavey talking. What they got instead were some harsh words. This time around, the civilian and military leadership got together and presented a joint front to the Americans.

The US tried to dilute the PPP government’s joint military-civilian front by investigating alternatives. For the first time, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was summoned to the US Embassy in Islamabad and he went. On previous occasions, he had refused to go the US Embassy and criticized those who did. However this time he acquiesced. Hungry for power, he may have been questioned on his position on the drones and the joint patrolling. It must be recalled that during Kargil, Mr. Sharifran to Washington to surrender at the White House. Where there is smoke there is fire. Something is cooking in the PMLN-US Embassy cauldron and its not nihari. The political scene smells of foul fish. We will soon find out what was fishy, or whether the US was successful in fishing in troubled waters.

This time around, when Admiral Mullen and Mr. Richard Holbrooke landed in Islamabad, a different sort of welcome awaited them. They were reminded of their earlier statements and Pakistan politely reminded them of the Red Lines that had been drawn.

The inability to create a facade of victory in Afghanistan creates an embarrassing situation for the incompetent US Generals who have been painting a rosy picture for the American public. How long can General Patraeus, Admiral Mullen and Richard Holbrooke continue to fool the American people? The answer is obvious, not for very long.

Already the polls have begun to shift. Most American view the economy as the number one problem and Iraq and Afghanistan a distant second. About half of America now favors a withdrawal from Afghanistan. Of course there is near consensus on leaving Baghdad.

The CIA faces its toughest test yet to prove wrong the suspicions of many within the Pakistani strategic community that some of the terrorism exported from Afghan soil into Pakistan has direct or indirect support from Washington.

The immediate test centres on Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the bandits who present themselves as Pakistani Taliban. The Americans have begun some cosmetic drone attacks on Baitullah’sterritory and there are reports Washington has agreed to launch a joint operation withPakistan against this bandit. The purpose is to assuage Pakistani concerns about the US role. In July last year, Pakistan’s military leadership confronted senior CIA and US military commanders withevidenceshowing Washington indirectly protecting anti-Pakistan terrorists on the ground. This newspaper broke that story on Aug. 5, 2008, with a front- page headline, “US told not to back terrorism against Pakistan.”

Mehsud is a good example. This bandit and his former leader and associate, Abdullah Mehsud, pioneered the attacks on Chinese interests in Pakistan, which was the first thing Abdullah did after being released from Gitmo in 2003. Interestingly, he was not handed back to Pakistan despite being a Pakistani citizen, but was released to Afghanistan where he went back into the custody of the US military and the Karzai government. Abdullah was killed when Pakistani security forces caught him sneaking back into Balochistan from Afghanistan, where he most probably was meeting his handlers. How he financed, armed and sustained a 25,000-strong militia remains beyond explanation. This militia continues to have quality arms and generous funding.

Until now CIA drones have never targeted Abdullah or Baitullah or any other militia that is committed to attacking Pakistan. During the operations in Bajaur, our soldiers were reportedly stunned at one point to see close to 600 well-armed terrorists come in from Afghanistan, fight the Pakistani military and then escape across the border. The CIA never attacks such “terrorists.” There has been a meteoric rise in the number of anti-Pakistan militias and fighters within our tribal belt since 2004, complete withreligiousbrainwashing justifying the killing of Pakistanis as a first priority. This has coincided with the launch of terrorism in Balochistan and northern Pakistan, the area between Gwadar port and the Chinese border. The CIA’s footprints, Thursday, April 09, 2009, Ahmed Quraishi. The writer works for Geo TV. Email: aq@ahmedquraishil.com

Pakistan helped the US as a friend, not as a paymaster. No amount of money is enough for lost Pakistani lives. It is insensitive to place a Dollar value on the heads of 4000 Pakistani soldiers who lost their lives fighting the terrorists. It is crass to place a monetary value on the hundreds of Pakistani civilians who died because Pakistan has been supporting the American war in Afghanistan. Neither the government, nor the people nor the president of Pakistan are indentured servants of anyone. Pakistan was helping the US as a friend and an ally.

In order to punish the real or imaginary Pakistani tolerance for “Afghan Taliban” - the real Taliban, I must add - someone who wields power in Afghanistan decided to make Pakistan pay by grooming their own Islamic fighters who’d solely focus on fighting Pakistan (as compared to the Afghan Taliban who focus on fighting the Americans insideAfghanistan) - professional killers trained in the art of recruiting and organising death squads, Islam-focused propaganda experts fluent in Pashto, Uzbek, Arabic and, possibly, Chechen, and develop conduits for money and arms supplies from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

The US uses India to ratchet up the heat on Pakistan whenever there is a hiccup in the relationship. These days the Indian climbdown coincides with renewed signs that Pakistan’s political and military leaderships are cooperating with Washington.

In 2002, the Americans were allowed to establish bases in BalochistanandCIA was given the right to recruit Pakistanis in the tribal belt. These two areas of Pakistan are now the most disturbed parts of our country. And now our territory is being used to attack the interests of Iran and China. Washington is creating conditions across our western belt that would make it impossible for China to pursue trade and energy corridors through Pakistan.

Hopefully, Mr Richard Holbrooke heard in Islamabad that we don’t accept American diktat over Afghanistan where we have our own interests to watch like everyone else. The CIA’s footprints, Thursday, April 09, 2009, Ahmed Quraishi. The writer works for Geo TV. Email: aq@ahmedquraishil.com

The PMLQ, the PMLN, the JI and Senator Mushahid Hussain etc. as well as the National Assembly of Pakistan have passed a resolution asking to halt the Drones and stop the fighting. “They” can ignore it at their own risk.

They thought that General Kiyani was a softy who would roll over and play dead. When he clearly informed the US of the red lines, Richard Hobrooke and Armiral Mullen began their rhetoric against the Pakistani Army and the Pakistani ISI. Prime Minister Gilani and even Ambassador Haqqanidefended both institutions (even though Haqqani had derided the army for more than two decades).

To convince Pakistan, an army of sabateurs are on the attack, blowing up schools, buildings, and offices in Pakistani cities. These are the operations that Vice President Biden would not talk about.

Pakistan faced similar issues during the First Afghan war when Russian agents would blow up civilians in Pakistan as reprisal for the American-Pakistan’s war against the USSR. It was the KGB-Khad-RAW then. The same players are at it again. The problems faced by Pakistan are the making of RAW (Indian intelligence services) and their cohorts in Afghanistan. When the US planted an anti-Pakistan government in Kabul, Mr. Karzai (the mayor of Kabul) threatened Pakistan to cover his incompetence and inept narco-warlord government.

Why CIA drones never target Baitullah or any other Anti-Pakistan militia that is committing terrorism against Islamabad RUPEE NEWS: Recording History, Narrating Archives, Strategic Intellibrief Analysis: Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Ru
 

white_pawn

FULL MEMBER
Mar 30, 2009
707
0
166
Some time i feel a bit suspicious about the intentions of the USG and CIA, as its bit difficult to belive that so many agencies are behind Bin laden, Baitullah & etc even then they are unable to track these ppls. Its just i think that they want to stay here to manipulate and take control of the energy resourses in the region.
 

IceCold

PDF VETERAN
May 1, 2007
16,299
8
19,073
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Why CIA drones never target Baitullah or any other Anti-Pakistan militia that is committing terrorism against Islamabad

The US is not used to hearing an earful in Islamabad. It usually hands over lists to the leaders. When they do not comply, they are threatened with “we will bomb you to the stone ages” (Musharraf), or “we will make a horrible example of you (Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto), or “we will eliminate you if you do not let us bomb Iran(Liaqat Ali Khan) or “how dare you shut down the US base in Badabare (AyubKhan). Some world and Pakistani leaders who tried to go against the grain paid with their lives.

Liaqat Ali Khan who had negotated a confederatio with King Zahir Shah of Afhanistan, and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto who had pledged himself to making a nuclear bomb were to iconic figures and were actually assassinated. Ayub Khan and Pervez Musharraf had to leave office when they tried to go against their masters. THE PAKISTANI RESILIENCE IN THE FACE OF THREATS: Mountbatten, Nehru, Mohandas Gandhi, Indira, Kruschev, Johnson, Carter, Kissinger, Nixon, Gorbachev, Clinton, Armitage, Bush, Karzai, Vajpayee, Singh have all threatened Pakistan: The Pakistanis are used to it…so what else is new?!! Pakistan’s Nuclear Program should be seen in the backdrop of these threats.

The American were once again reminded of India’s designs in Afghanistan.INDIRA GANDHI to HENRY KISSINGER: “The Northwest Frontier Province belongs to India and the only way to get there is through the Punjab”. .The American message to work with India agasint China was once agine rebutted. The idea of becoming subservient to India is abhorrent and that of cooperation withIndia, withthe object of promoting tension with China, equally repugnant.” Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto

According to Tariq Ali, the current President of Pakistan was coronated because of US largess who wanted a compliant president in Pakistan. General Kiyaniwasthoroughly vetted and he was schmoozed by Washington for about a week recently. With this setup in mind, Mr. Holbrooke, and Admiral Mullen went on an aggressive propoganda campaignto malign the ISI. Somewhere along the way they got lost in their own words and began speaking against the Pakistan Army too. When they arrived in Islamabad, they expected to do some heavey talking. What they got instead were some harsh words. This time around, the civilian and military leadership got together and presented a joint front to the Americans.

The US tried to dilute the PPP government’s joint military-civilian front by investigating alternatives. For the first time, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was summoned to the US Embassy in Islamabad and he went. On previous occasions, he had refused to go the US Embassy and criticized those who did. However this time he acquiesced. Hungry for power, he may have been questioned on his position on the drones and the joint patrolling. It must be recalled that during Kargil, Mr. Sharifran to Washington to surrender at the White House. Where there is smoke there is fire. Something is cooking in the PMLN-US Embassy cauldron and its not nihari. The political scene smells of foul fish. We will soon find out what was fishy, or whether the US was successful in fishing in troubled waters.

This time around, when Admiral Mullen and Mr. Richard Holbrooke landed in Islamabad, a different sort of welcome awaited them. They were reminded of their earlier statements and Pakistan politely reminded them of the Red Lines that had been drawn.

The inability to create a facade of victory in Afghanistan creates an embarrassing situation for the incompetent US Generals who have been painting a rosy picture for the American public. How long can General Patraeus, Admiral Mullen and Richard Holbrooke continue to fool the American people? The answer is obvious, not for very long.

Already the polls have begun to shift. Most American view the economy as the number one problem and Iraq and Afghanistan a distant second. About half of America now favors a withdrawal from Afghanistan. Of course there is near consensus on leaving Baghdad.

The CIA faces its toughest test yet to prove wrong the suspicions of many within the Pakistani strategic community that some of the terrorism exported from Afghan soil into Pakistan has direct or indirect support from Washington.

The immediate test centres on Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the bandits who present themselves as Pakistani Taliban. The Americans have begun some cosmetic drone attacks on Baitullah’sterritory and there are reports Washington has agreed to launch a joint operation withPakistan against this bandit. The purpose is to assuage Pakistani concerns about the US role. In July last year, Pakistan’s military leadership confronted senior CIA and US military commanders withevidenceshowing Washington indirectly protecting anti-Pakistan terrorists on the ground. This newspaper broke that story on Aug. 5, 2008, with a front- page headline, “US told not to back terrorism against Pakistan.”

Mehsud is a good example. This bandit and his former leader and associate, Abdullah Mehsud, pioneered the attacks on Chinese interests in Pakistan, which was the first thing Abdullah did after being released from Gitmo in 2003. Interestingly, he was not handed back to Pakistan despite being a Pakistani citizen, but was released to Afghanistan where he went back into the custody of the US military and the Karzai government. Abdullah was killed when Pakistani security forces caught him sneaking back into Balochistan from Afghanistan, where he most probably was meeting his handlers. How he financed, armed and sustained a 25,000-strong militia remains beyond explanation. This militia continues to have quality arms and generous funding.

Until now CIA drones have never targeted Abdullah or Baitullah or any other militia that is committed to attacking Pakistan. During the operations in Bajaur, our soldiers were reportedly stunned at one point to see close to 600 well-armed terrorists come in from Afghanistan, fight the Pakistani military and then escape across the border. The CIA never attacks such “terrorists.” There has been a meteoric rise in the number of anti-Pakistan militias and fighters within our tribal belt since 2004, complete withreligiousbrainwashing justifying the killing of Pakistanis as a first priority. This has coincided with the launch of terrorism in Balochistan and northern Pakistan, the area between Gwadar port and the Chinese border. The CIA’s footprints, Thursday, April 09, 2009, Ahmed Quraishi. The writer works for Geo TV. Email: aq@ahmedquraishil.com

Pakistan helped the US as a friend, not as a paymaster. No amount of money is enough for lost Pakistani lives. It is insensitive to place a Dollar value on the heads of 4000 Pakistani soldiers who lost their lives fighting the terrorists. It is crass to place a monetary value on the hundreds of Pakistani civilians who died because Pakistan has been supporting the American war in Afghanistan. Neither the government, nor the people nor the president of Pakistan are indentured servants of anyone. Pakistan was helping the US as a friend and an ally.

In order to punish the real or imaginary Pakistani tolerance for “Afghan Taliban” - the real Taliban, I must add - someone who wields power in Afghanistan decided to make Pakistan pay by grooming their own Islamic fighters who’d solely focus on fighting Pakistan (as compared to the Afghan Taliban who focus on fighting the Americans insideAfghanistan) - professional killers trained in the art of recruiting and organising death squads, Islam-focused propaganda experts fluent in Pashto, Uzbek, Arabic and, possibly, Chechen, and develop conduits for money and arms supplies from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

The US uses India to ratchet up the heat on Pakistan whenever there is a hiccup in the relationship. These days the Indian climbdown coincides with renewed signs that Pakistan’s political and military leaderships are cooperating with Washington.

In 2002, the Americans were allowed to establish bases in BalochistanandCIA was given the right to recruit Pakistanis in the tribal belt. These two areas of Pakistan are now the most disturbed parts of our country. And now our territory is being used to attack the interests of Iran and China. Washington is creating conditions across our western belt that would make it impossible for China to pursue trade and energy corridors through Pakistan.

Hopefully, Mr Richard Holbrooke heard in Islamabad that we don’t accept American diktat over Afghanistan where we have our own interests to watch like everyone else. The CIA’s footprints, Thursday, April 09, 2009, Ahmed Quraishi. The writer works for Geo TV. Email: aq@ahmedquraishil.com

The PMLQ, the PMLN, the JI and Senator Mushahid Hussain etc. as well as the National Assembly of Pakistan have passed a resolution asking to halt the Drones and stop the fighting. “They” can ignore it at their own risk.

They thought that General Kiyani was a softy who would roll over and play dead. When he clearly informed the US of the red lines, Richard Hobrooke and Armiral Mullen began their rhetoric against the Pakistani Army and the Pakistani ISI. Prime Minister Gilani and even Ambassador Haqqanidefended both institutions (even though Haqqani had derided the army for more than two decades).

To convince Pakistan, an army of sabateurs are on the attack, blowing up schools, buildings, and offices in Pakistani cities. These are the operations that Vice President Biden would not talk about.

Pakistan faced similar issues during the First Afghan war when Russian agents would blow up civilians in Pakistan as reprisal for the American-Pakistan’s war against the USSR. It was the KGB-Khad-RAW then. The same players are at it again. The problems faced by Pakistan are the making of RAW (Indian intelligence services) and their cohorts in Afghanistan. When the US planted an anti-Pakistan government in Kabul, Mr. Karzai (the mayor of Kabul) threatened Pakistan to cover his incompetence and inept narco-warlord government.

Why CIA drones never target Baitullah or any other Anti-Pakistan militia that is committing terrorism against Islamabad RUPEE NEWS: Recording History, Narrating Archives, Strategic Intellibrief Analysis: Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Ru
A very thoughtful and eye opening insight over the great mess Pakistan is in and being on the wrong side has made us pay a huge price and even at this stage if we did not get our acts straight, then i may dare say, Pakistan Good Bye. This article is recommended for all those Pakistani brothers that see all the fault within.
This is something that should be raised over the media as well, let the general public know whats going on and who's behind it, the so called Taliban wanna be or perhaps their real masters who are supposedly our allies. The example of BM in this regard is a classic one, enough to open the eyes yet ignorance is something truly blessed to many.
 

sohailbutt

FULL MEMBER
Jan 24, 2008
653
0
202
This shows that Pakistan is fighting war of it's survival here, well I think this should be brought up into the media and discussed on various forums in the media all over Pakistan. An awesome article:)
 

s90

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 28, 2008
1,313
1
590
Mehsud is backed by USA...dont know abt India,stupidity is that drone attacks are done by america and instead of cross border attack he takes revenge from Punjab Police,wtf? :crazy:
 

ANDUBYLL

BANNED
Jan 14, 2009
318
0
116
INDIRA GANDHI to HENRY KISSINGER: “The Northwest Frontier Province belongs to India and the only way to get there is through the Punjab”
.

I cannot understand India's fixation with NWFP and Afghanistan. Even Nehru was mesmerised with them and sought to install India's presence. It seems that Afghanistan is more important than Bangladesh/Sindh/Balochistan and even Kashmir. You often hear Indians dismiss Pak administrated Kashmir as a strategic wasteland but talk of Afghanistan and Sarhad as areas of Indian influence !!
Is this a great game that Brits used to play, is it India's ancient links to Afghanistan , is it to deny Pakistan , strategic depth or any other gameplan of India ?? I cant see any rhyme or reason to the morbid fascination, India displays for Afghanistan !!
 

Irfan Baloch

SENIOR MODERATOR
Apr 12, 2009
18,969
185
43,291
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
dear friends,
the problem is that our governments are not clear and honest with the people. the media is pro-taliban and brings up people in the talk shows that are extremely anti Pakistan army.
they talk of it as if they are talking about Israeli army.

mehsud is definitely on Indian/ US payroll. so are the SWATI taliban who are laden with US dollars. A lack of backbone and sincerity of leadership is letting us down. we dont need money or weapons what ever we have is enough to take care of this terrorism in Pakistan. its been a while when I saw the general public applauding and hailing the security forces in Lahore police training institution. our people are waiting for true leaders who are not worried about their swiss accounts or their trade interests with India but with the sovereignty of Pakistan
Pakistan Zindabad
 

Irfan Baloch

SENIOR MODERATOR
Apr 12, 2009
18,969
185
43,291
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
brothers I will like to point out one thing about Balochistan as well. both the indians and BLA sypathizers are removing all links in wikipedia which point at indian involvement or indian support to the fascist terrorist organisation.

I used a link of wikipedia in one of my stories but later on found out that the wikipedia page was editted and the indian RAW invovlement part was taken out. surely our enemies are not sleeping so neither should we
 
Apr 1, 2009
155
0
58
brothers I will like to point out one thing about Balochistan as well. both the indians and BLA sypathizers are removing all links in wikipedia which point at indian involvement or indian support to the fascist terrorist organisation.

I used a link of wikipedia in one of my stories but later on found out that the wikipedia page was editted and the indian RAW invovlement part was taken out. surely our enemies are not sleeping so neither should we
Hearsay is removed in Wikipedia after the editor fails to provide a citation after a week or so. The process is automated if the editor isn't a contributing member. I doubt it's got anything to do with Mossad/CIA/RAW/Mermaids/IRG conspiring against Pakistan although it's possible seeing that anyone can edit it.

IMHO, Wikipedia shouldn't be considered a reference worthy source even though its gradually seeping into the mainstream. I glean more info from their linked citations if anything.
 

S-2

PROFESSIONAL
Dec 25, 2007
4,210
0
2,507
Wiki is fine and a great tool IF you use those citations to affirm the sourcing.

Roll with it.

It's where the sourcing is non-existent or of dubious quality that there's an issue. That, btw, is an issue with ANY written text. Not wiki's fault. It always falls back to the author-as it should.
 

Rabbit.Rabbit

FULL MEMBER
Apr 7, 2009
260
0
52
Wikipedia is indeed a great resource if you understand how it works. A lot of people complain its not credible since anybody can edit it. True, but then all you have to do is check the sources - wikipedia does not allow original research - whatever you write has to be backed by third sources, so the credibility depends entirely on which sources have been used.

Wiki is a great starting point for any research. Simply clicking on the citations will get you access to a lot of solid information.
 

XYON

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 20, 2008
1,719
2
1,552
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
If Baitullah Mehsud, Osama Bin Laden etc etc are all killed in a short period of time, then the US justification of having a large military presence in Afghanistan, next to Pakistan (to keep a check on our nukes??) in aid to India against the ultimate coalition against China AND to have a healthy and thriving US defense industry will not be possible. Like I always say, evil villains (such as the above) and action/ violence are necessary in a movie to make the heroes (US etc) look good. When villains die, the movie ends and the audience goes home. However, this movie does not seem to be heading towards an end just yet!
 

ishaq76

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Jan 17, 2009
13
0
1
this is what i have always been telling you guys
we may learn after 20 or more years that bin laden and fazl ullah and mehsud were all heros of USA and its allies
i have seen these so called holy warriors having baad past using money lavishly and having weponry more sophisticated than even our army. we must fight them together and our secret agencies and policy makers must decide whether they have to work for better pakistan or secure USA
 

SSGPA1

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 23, 2007
2,629
0
1,276
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Last year in April or May time frame Musharraf was shown a video of Brahamdagh Bugti travelling in Indian Consulate cars in Kabul. During the same time frame, ISI provided CIA with co-ordinates for Mehsood and and asked for drone attacks, on both occasions CIA didn't take any action.

According to sources, Musharraf was going to take serious action but during Zardari visited the US and asked Musharraf to resign.

There will never be any attack on Mehsood! Insha-Allah PA will sort him and others out on their own.

China and Russia will not sit idle for long with US presence and US economy will not be able to take this pressure for long either.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Similar threads


Top Bottom