What's new

Who should build Australia’s submarines? The US doesn’t have the workers

Beast

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 5, 2011
30,560
-51
67,176
Country
China
Location
China
yes because Chinese built the first copy cat SSN in 1972 and after 50 years still Chinese never conducted any deference patrols

Trident has been tested over 180th times to test and revalidate the systems

Chinese JL3 has been tested how many times? like 4?
LOL... Keep on delusion that China dont have SSBN patrol. It doesnt change the fact, the nuclear trinity of China has achieved.


The UK ....
LOL.. UK is even worst than US.
 

aziqbal

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 26, 2010
5,415
3
7,723
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
LOL... Keep on delusion that China dont have SSBN patrol. It doesnt change the fact, the nuclear trinity of China has achieved.



LOL.. UK is even worst than US.

fake Chinese JL2 was a total failure and they made more counterfeit ones called JL3 which also failed

terrible Chinese rockets have insulations falling off after launch

China is eyeing something else, the absolute Chinese dominance over global battery technology enables China to try something of a different new level in subs



JL2 was a failure

the JL3 was even bigger failure
 

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 4, 2011
56,057
-23
98,145
Country
China
Location
China
fake Chinese JL2 was a total failure and they made more counterfeit ones called JL3 which also failed

terrible Chinese rockets have insulations falling off after launch



JL2 was a failure

the JL3 was even bigger failure
LOL, Everythng is a failure, but no one is a bigger failure than you losing your "analyst" title
 

sparten

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 11, 2006
2,191
-1
1,709
The sub will be build at ASC shipyard in South Australia. The deal is, US supply the technical data to build the nuclear reactor and the UK build it. There are talks for Australia to build a nuclear facility in Sydney where the only Nuclear Reactor currently functioning in Australia. But that remain talks.
Thats a nuclear isotope maker. Not something which can be used to piggyback to operate Naval reactors.
 

jhungary

MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
Oct 24, 2012
16,497
379
15,929
Country
China
Location
Australia
Thats a nuclear isotope maker. Not something which can be used to piggyback to operate Naval reactors.
lol, not building it in the medial nuclear research facilities, they are talking about building a brand new reactor and enrichment facilities near it.

Australia is a nuclear free zone, not a lot of place can build nuclear reactor.
 

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
15,695
-8
6,313
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
The sub will be build at ASC shipyard in South Australia. The deal is, US supply the technical data to build the nuclear reactor and the UK build it. There are talks for Australia to build a nuclear facility in Sydney where the only Nuclear Reactor currently functioning in Australia. But that remain talks.
What happened to MPT of USA doesn't apply on Australia
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom