He rightly predicted that Canadas courts would abondon every ounce of credibility and prove that Canada is subject to U.S. rule of the jungle.Nathan Rich debunked that this was about Iran. Many corporations had dealings with Iran. And were "fined", there was no kidnapping as Meng was.
What a nonsense. Canadian court, despite its inefficiency, has never abandoned its rules in this case. It has always done by the book.He rightly predicted that Canadas courts would abondon every ounce of credibility and prove that Canada is subject to U.S. rule of the jungle.
The Canadian court was obviously just about to hand her over to the U.S. regime, exactly because the U.S. regimes lies got completely destroyed in court and they lost the court case on every account. The Canadian court case was effectively over, but thats not how American cangaroo trials work. For the U.S. regime it was just a chance to watch the hostage fail to properly defend her innocence so they can be even bolder with the their slander and lies and give more food to their propaganda mouthpieces and paid shills who are starving for dumb talking points since they keep failing to make Huawei's business bend over.
Stop insulting our intelligence with such a horridly disingenious claim.What a nonsense. Canadian court, despite its inefficiency, has never abandoned its rules in this case. It has always done by the book.
You didn't show any shred of evidence to back up your claims. All you have is just slanderous insults. It is all emotional and has nothing to do with intelligence, which I doubt you still have any left.Stop insulting our intelligence with such a horridly disingenious claim.
This shitshow of a cangaroo court trial was a total farce and every basic principle of the law was abondoned by the court and the court jumped trough hoops and bent over to make ridiculous excuses to maintain the facade of the criminal foreign regime running the show and justify keeping a victim that was already categorically proven innocent hostage without any valid reason. All after already treating completely baseless allegations and highly dubious forms of "evidence" that ended up completely disproven completely differently before the law because the came from a more powerfull individiual, violating the first and most basic prinicple of Canadian law by own definition, and allowed this kidnapping to happen in first place just because the U.S. regime wanted a hostage.
It set a precedence for the U.S. terror regime to piss over the rights of any Canadian or rights granted by Canadian law to any person in Canada at will just by fabricating allegations out of thin air even if anyone including the court knowns and can see with their bare eyes that the allegations and purported "evidence" are invalid, fake and absurd.
You jump in here, rant at a me directly referencing and responding to week old predictions accompanied by a whole documentation laying out all the relevant facts that where established weeks ago, drop another of your lazy "nonsense! everything the opposite! everything fine! not intelligent!" onliners with absolutely zero substance and now start demanding that I entertain your lazily feigned ignorance by wasting my time spoonfeeding some troll and going all over the "evidence" again that is not already but still right there and quack about "all emotional" and "slurs"?You didn't show any shred of evidence to back up your claims. All you have is just slanderous insults. It is all emotional and has nothing to do with intelligence, which I doubt you still have any left.