What's new

What a Sight India netra Awacs flanked by Indian designed fighters

Thamizh Puli

BANNED
Aug 24, 2019
958
-7
503
Country
India
Location
United States
what we bite for our Chinese military equipment, i am asking you in a simple words that how we suffers from Chinese military equipment, its burden upon you that give us the answer how our Chinese military equipment are unreliable/junk/carp, if you haven't any answer then get a hike
see how you proved immediately that you guys are incapable for logical reasoning? you cannot retain a single train of thought or debate - instead you will jump to topic to topic, knowing if you continue in one the argument will be lost. That's why I have stopped reasoning with Pakistani cyber soldiers; at least the Chinese will copy and repeat a claim 'creatively'
 

drumstick

FULL MEMBER
Feb 17, 2020
935
-19
632
Country
India
Location
India
khortay, we never claim JF-17 is indeginous, clue is in the name "Joint", but you constantly show us image of "indigenous" LCA with foreign engine, radar, missile, probe, seat etc
i ask you to bring the detailed design of your fighter but you beat around the bush and asking million questions here....
dont you even have such detailed design or that is also with chinese? but you clim to be a "joint" partner without a detailed design?
 

Yasser76

FULL MEMBER
Mar 28, 2017
1,617
1
2,435
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
i ask you to bring the detailed design of your fighter but you beat around the bush and asking million questions here....
dont you even have such detailed design or that is also with chinese? but you clim to be a "joint" partner without a detailed design?
Detailed design? I don't work at PAC....
 

VkdIndian

BANNED
Jan 6, 2021
251
-4
155
Country
India
Location
India
"joint" partner without a detailed design?
China decided to use the word “JOINT” to make some people happy. Couldn’t China have produced a fighter of JF class without “so called jointness” and technical prowess of Pakistan? But they allowed the use of word “Joint” and some people are going nuts over this word.
With this logic India could have called SU-30 also joint. Because, India produces SU-30s in the same manner wherein the airframe is manufactured and the aircraft assembled with import of few parts from Russia and other countries. SU-30 MKI was given a lot of enhancement based on Indian requirements.
This word “JOINT” has really destroyed a nation’s perception of it's technical capability. From no where and completely lost in the world of aviation technology a nation has started thinking that it has arrived already. 😜😜

Very soon there might be swarms of trolls saying that for LCA also India is importing the engine and some other stuff. They wouldn’t understand the difference between designing the airframe, controls, FBW, onboard systems and integrating these completely on your own VS sending some people to China to lay down the QRs who then produce it and the output becomes a “JOINT” one. 🤣🤣
 

Yasser76

FULL MEMBER
Mar 28, 2017
1,617
1
2,435
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
China decided to use the word “JOINT” to make some people happy. Couldn’t China have produced a fighter of JF class without “so called jointness” and technical prowess of Pakistan? But they allowed the use of word “Joint” and some people are going nuts over this word.
With this logic India could have called SU-30 also joint. Because, India produces SU-30s in the same manner wherein the airframe is manufactured and the aircraft assembled with import of few parts from Russia and other countries. SU-30 MKI was given a lot of enhancement based on Indian requirements.
This word “JOINT” has really destroyed a nation’s perception of it's technical capability. From no where and completely lost in the world of aviation technology a nation has started thinking that it has arrived already. 😜😜

Very soon there might be swarms of trolls saying that for LCA also India is importing the engine and some other stuff. They wouldn’t understand the difference between designing the airframe, controls, FBW, onboard systems and integrating these completely on your own VS sending some people to China to lay down the QRs who then produce it and the output becomes a “JOINT” one. 🤣🤣

Difference is Pakistan decided not to reinvent the wheel when it comes to just having a fighter we can build and support at home, which is what JF-17 is.

Indians were stupid enough to go the other route....
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom