Catch up? Surpress? first figure out by what metric you are comparing.Then in your opinion, will China catch up and surpass the US in this area eventually?
Catch up? Surpress? first figure out by what metric you are comparing.Then in your opinion, will China catch up and surpass the US in this area eventually?
Seems like they have a working product but live demos with these bots are extremely risky. The chance these bots answer with some nazi or anti-ccp garbage it found online is real.You can put lipstick on a pig, but... All I can say is that Baidu is foolish for trying to boost their stock valuation with this before the thing is ready.
Look at the question. It’s about bigfoot. That’s the keyword. The program tries to work like a human brain. It indexes every words around @bigfoot. Is that the first time a question is raised about bigfoot? Probably not. Then understand the context, the meaning. Human brains have memory people remember. Computers have much easier. It has higher capacity it works faster. It can tap into the vast resources of prior answers and responses, then selects the best of it.Can you explain to me what encyclopedias or books would give it the insight to be able to answer a crazy conversation like this.
![]()
![]()
![]()
LOL, after getting it really irritated it has now turned to being condescending...
![]()
Catch up? Surpress? first figure out by what metric you are comparing.
Look at the question. It’s about bigfoot. That’s the keyword. The program tries to work like a human brain. It indexes every words around @bigfoot. Is that the first time a question is raised about bigfoot? Probably not. Then understand the context, the meaning. Human brains have memory people remember. Computers have much easier. It has higher capacity it works faster. It can tap into the vast resources of prior answers and responses, then selects the best of it.
well your questions could be categorized for a standard reply by AI...Yes, exactly. That's the point! It is doing something far more than just being Wikipedia or an encyclopedia.
It gathered all the data and determined using reports of its size, strength (and inferred its possible intelligence) as to whether I'd be easily able to toss it into the trunk of my car. I'm quite sure nobody has ever written an account of attempting to do this which ChatGPT is using as a reference. It extrapolated all that on its own.
I could have easily said I'm trying to capture the Loch Ness Monster so I can put it on display in SeaWorld's killer whale tank back in California and see what it would say. You think anybody has written an account of that for it to base its answer?
From a technical point of view, a model is judged on accuracy and performance. But for these language bots based on the GPT framework, a major problem is how to curtail toxic text and bias towards marginalized groups.What metric is commonly used to measure the performance of an AI model like GPT?
被迫上场?我们全方位测试了文心一言,只能说_____。【差评君】_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
我们拿到了文心一言的邀测资格,体验完之后,我只能说百度的胆子真的 “很大”,欢迎一起在评论区分享你的感觉,感谢大家的一键三连支持~, 视频播放量 1035102、弹幕量 7137、点赞数 52142、投硬币枚数 10405、收藏人数 9525、转发人数 18192, 视频作者 差评君, 作者简介 Debug the World!商务合作请加V:maguabd01,相关视频:chatgpt嘲讽文心一言,笑不活了,宇宙这么大,我们是怎么测它的大小的?【差评君】,图 灵 测...www.bilibili.com
I've changed my mind, Ernie Bot is way better than ChatGPT. 🤣🤣
![]()
Baidu used an open source database from Germany to train its AI painting. Which is based on English. Most other AI companies also use same database. No big deal. Further, I don't know why these people used AI painting function to deny all Ernie bot functions. ChatGPT doesn't even have AI painting function. For me AI painting is not important. What I care is all other functions that ChatGPT has.让百度 AI 画“起重机”,为啥它画出个“鹤”?好诡异..._哔哩哔哩_bilibili
-, 视频播放量 1864359、弹幕量 1973、点赞数 88763、投硬币枚数 2753、收藏人数 9344、转发人数 12702, 视频作者 侃哥侃英语, 作者简介 趣味英语讲解,人文通识科普。个人微信...www.bilibili.com
View attachment 922365 View attachment 922366 View attachment 922367输入爱国显示美国,百度人工智能套壳?有网友质疑套用国外系统!_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
-, 视频播放量 221854、弹幕量 251、点赞数 3182、投硬币枚数 272、收藏人数 766、转发人数 3120, 视频作者 万花丛里升, 作者简介 ,相关视频:百度文心一言实测,太离谱了!!,让百度 AI 画“起重机”,为啥它画出个“鹤”?好诡异...,外媒报道:百度文心一言套壳?,文心一言真是自研吗?直接上论文干货!,从弱智吧出师的文心一言,《让文心一言画下棋,但 国际象棋》,文心一言不是中译英,夸欧美国家=间谍走狗50w?,世纪大骗局,汉芯造假让中国芯片研发停滞13年!,敌方AI绘画VS我方AI绘画,MidjourneyVS文心一言·百度www.bilibili.com
View attachment 922368
View attachment 922371
View attachment 922372
tapping into thousands of lexicons is one thing however understanding the context is the most important. Otherwise the program doesn’t know what’s the best answer out of thousands possible answers. Yes the trend is there. A matter of time then a robot will be your best friend.Yes, exactly. That's the point! It is doing something far more than just being Wikipedia or an encyclopedia.
It gathered all the data and determined using reports of its size, strength (and inferred its possible intelligence) as to whether I'd be easily able to toss it into the trunk of my car. I'm quite sure nobody has ever written an account of attempting to do this which ChatGPT is using as a reference. It extrapolated all that on its own.
I could have easily said I'm trying to capture the Loch Ness Monster so I can put it on display in SeaWorld's killer whale tank back in California and see what it would say. You think anybody has written an account of that for it to base its answer?
The other thing I still missing from this chatbot. It doesn’t know latest news, or news of the day. It runs days behind actual developments.
![]()
ChatGPT's new plugins will deliver real-time stats | Engadget
OpenAI announced that it has begun introducing plugins for ChatGPT.www.engadget.com