What's new

Featured US seeks formal alliance similar to Nato with India, Japan and Australia, State Department official says

INDIAPOSITIVE

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 20, 2014
7,377
-7
7,581
Country
India
Location
India
  • Washington’s goal is to get countries in the Indo-Pacific region to work together as a bulwark against ‘a potential challenge from China’, says the US official
  • He says the four nations are expected to meet in Delhi sometime this autumn



Washington aims to formalise its closer Indo-Pacific defence relations with India, Japan and Australia – also known as “the quad” – into something more closely resembling the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (
Nato
), a senior US State Department official said on Monday.
The US government’s goal is to get the grouping of four countries and others in the region to work together as a bulwark against “a potential challenge from China” and “to create a critical mass around the shared values and interests of those parties in a manner that attracts more countries in the Indo-Pacific and even from around the world … ultimately to align in a more structured manner”, said Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun.
“The Indo-Pacific region is actually lacking in strong multilateral structures,” he said. “They don‘t have anything of the fortitude of Nato or the European Union. The strongest institutions in Asia oftentimes are not, I think, not inclusive enough and so … there is certainly an invitation there at some point to formalise a structure like this.”
“Remember even Nato started with relatively modest expectations and a number of countries [initially] chose neutrality over Nato membership,” Biegun added.


Biegun cautioned that Washington would keep its ambitions for a Pacific Nato “checked”, saying that such a formal alliance “only will happen if the other countries are as committed as the United States”.




Speaking with former US ambassador to India, Richard Verma, in an online discussion organised by the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum, Biegun also said the group of four nations were expected to meet in Delhi sometime this
autumn
and cited Australia’s possible participation in India’s Malabar naval exercise as an example of progress towards a more formal defence bloc.

India is “clearly indicating an intention to invite Australia to participate in the Malabar naval exercises, which will be a tremendous step forward in ensuring the freedom of passage and the security of the seas in the Indo-Pacific”, he said.




The naval exercises, taking place mostly in the Bay of Bengal, have been run annually by the US and India since 1992, and have included Japan since 2015.

Australia had taken part in the Malabar games once, in 2007, “but Beijing pushed back, meaning that India demurred on repeating the invitation, ostensibly for fear of needlessly antagonising China, despite Canberra’s clear willingness to take part,” the Sydney-based think tank Lowy Institute said in a July report. Singapore also took part in 2007.




The Lowy report said
clashes between Chinese and Indian troops
in June in the Himalayan Galwan valley, in which at least 20 Indian soldiers died, made the Indian government more inclined to bring Australia back into the Malabar games.

Japan and the United States have already been invited to join this year’s exercise, which has been delayed because of Covid-19, but Delhi has not yet formally invited Australia.
Biegun’s comments follow those of Donald Trump’s national security adviser Robert O’Brien, who on Friday
called China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea “ridiculous”
and touted upcoming quad meetings and planned visits by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo with his counterparts in India, Japan and Australia in September and October.

The State Department official also suggested that Washington would like to see South Korea, Vietnam and New Zealand to eventually join an expanded version of the quad, citing the “very cooperative” meetings that the group of four had with officials from these countries about the response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Those meetings between senior-level officials of the seven countries were “incredibly productive discussion among very, very cooperative partners, and one that we should look at to see a natural grouping of countries that really will do their very best to advance this combination of interests that we have made up Pacific”, Biegun said.

 

Chhatrapati

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 4, 2016
10,319
-22
8,477
Country
India
Location
Mauritius
You are missing Russian Angle here
I agree, but when there is a bigger risk of Chinese, all those angles are thrown out of the window. Russians cannot influence the Chinese, still Russians can screw the Chinese over like the Chinese did to the Soviets with the help of US.
 

Protest_again

SENIOR MEMBER
May 19, 2019
3,430
-38
2,419
Country
India
Location
India
You are missing Russian Angle here

Due Russians We cannot go into any formal Alliance
Russians know that this is an alliance against China. No matter how much US would prod us against Russia we'll not engage. Also they have NATO for they to deal with Russia.

India as a major power can no longer dilly dally on the fences and expect big powers there be would rescue us on our terms. That was when India was dead poor. It no longer is. So let's honestly join all those clubs that are beneficial to us economically and security wise.
 

Protest_again

SENIOR MEMBER
May 19, 2019
3,430
-38
2,419
Country
India
Location
India
We cannot & should not antagonize Russia. This is a non-starter.
What is this 'cannot and should not'? There is no brotherhood in diplomacy. We need to do what is in our interest. Russia is a good friend but they can't and won't dictate our relationship with other countries. As long as GOI conveys clearly to Russia this isn't against them, I don't see a problem with this for Russia.
 

drumstick

FULL MEMBER
Feb 17, 2020
914
-17
623
Country
India
Location
India
"similar to Nato" means there will be US military bases setting up all over India. Looking forward to it.
you cant handle one American plane flying 76 km from shanghai... cant fire one missile to take it down... but next day you will fire missile in open waters? what a pathetic show man... you should die of humiliation.

and now you talk to looking forward for many American bases in India.... already you lost your pants... what more to lose for china?
 

mourning sage

FULL MEMBER
Jun 29, 2010
444
0
408
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
One might feel a great opportunity is presenting itself to India but if history is anything to go by, deepening ties with one Superpower at the expense of another will lead to unmitigated disasters. Of course, everyone learns their lessons the hard way so go for it. Have China unleash its wrath.
 

PakAlp

FULL MEMBER
Sep 27, 2007
1,063
1
1,741
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
China and India may have border issues but they won't have a full blown war, so its better for them both to rise as a power. Usa as usual is trying their level best to make other powers fight.
 

Globenim

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2011
2,386
-1
4,116
Country
China
Location
Thailand
Does that "alliance" come with extra sanctions to kill off Indian trade with Russia like they did with their other NATO "ally" Germany?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom