• Sunday, June 16, 2019

US needs Pakistan: Chomsky

Discussion in 'World Affairs' started by 53fd, May 29, 2011.

  1. 53fd

    53fd FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 7,291 / -0
    Chomsky said the moment Pakistan stopped cowing down to the US, the talks of nuclear threat and jihadi movements would start making headlines in the US media. He said while the threats existed, but they would merit action only when they threatened US interests.
    “We’ve all heard the term ‘to stabilise the region’ from the US government. Whenever the term is used it actually means that the US will destabilise the region but ‘stabilise’ any threat to its interests,” he said.

    He was speaking at the Café Bol in Gulberg’s Main Market on Wednesday. The lecture marked the season opening of the annual lecture series at the cafe. The first lecture included a tribute to Eqbal Ahmad, one of the most proactive political thinkers of the past few decades. Chomsky, a friend of Ahmad, himself enjoys what can only be described as cult status in a discipline that seldom endorses such interest among young and old alike.

    Chomsky spoke to a packed audience of over 80 people in an empty room above Café Bol via skype from his academic offices at MIT in the US. He spoke on several subjects during the one-and-a-half hour lecture. These included a brief history of the World War II, US imperialism and involvement in Latin America over the past three decades and the consequences as well as a more recent take on Pakistan.

    He also spoke fondly of his late friend Ahmed and the man’s involvement in improving Indo-Pak relations, his work with the National Liberation Front in Algeria and Ahmed’s politics. “He was an incredibly astute analyst. Discussion on every subject he touched upon was improved because of his involvement. He best predicted the future of both American and Pakistani political policy in the coming years,” Chomsky said.

    One of the most interesting subjects Chomsky elaborated upon was the situation in the Middle East and the parallels that one could, and could not, draw from it for Pakistan. “The US and its imperial allies will always prevent a functional democracy in the Middle East because that places the region beyond its control. They like democracy on paper but the fear of ‘real’ democracy in other parts of the world is cemented in the US psyche. It would mean a severe lapse of control where they are involved,” he said.

    With regard to Pakistan, Chomsky elaborated on his late friend’s view that the country’s leaders severely lacked commitment to the land and to its people. “Eqbal always said that there can be no revolution or change without a genuine commitment to the cause and that is lacking in Pakistan. Many don’t care if the country goes down the drain as long as they can profit from the fall out,” he added.

    During the question and answer session that followed, the MIT professor was asked to address the recent allegations against him and others such as Tariq Ali for being ‘Taliban Sympathisers’. “I don’t like to answer such questions because it tends to give them weight,” he said. “It’s like saying I’m in favour of child abuse. It’s so insipid and without basis that it doesn’t merit a response,” he said.

    With regards to the US-Pak relations post Osama bin Laden, he opened with a ‘Freudian slip’. “US-Pak relations post Obama or Osama? The fact is that not much will change from the present or at least it wont change quickly. Whether or not the US likes it, Pakistan is all it has got to keep control in the region. The country may not be it’s favourite ally but it is certainly one of the most important ones, if not the most. Aid will continue and support will continue. There is simply no other alternative.”

    Prof Chomsky also addressed the Israel-Palestine situation during the lecture. “The US knows that it is losing friends and fast. Over a 100 countries now recognise Palestine in some variety or the other and that exceeds more than half the world’s population. We know we are all moving towards a two-state solution and even this US government is beginning to recognise that,” he said.

    In US-Pakistan relations stability means obedience: Chomsky – The Express Tribune
     
  2. Shak_ed

    Shak_ed BANNED

    Messages:
    154
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Ratings:
    +0 / 35 / -0
    Pakistan only has nuclear weapons that worries the world, Pakistan without nuclear weapon is not useful even to China...
     
  3. laiqs@mi

    laiqs@mi FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,571
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,963 / -0
    :what:
    :cheesy::cheesy:
     
  4. Ziras

    Ziras FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,514
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 14,962 / -0
    yes USA needs PAKISTAN all the time. . . .
    for bullying,blaming and the most convenient escape goat.
     
  5. Ziras

    Ziras FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,514
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 14,962 / -0
    self delete
     
  6. Ziras

    Ziras FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,514
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 14,962 / -0
    self delete
     
  7. Ziras

    Ziras FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,514
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 14,962 / -0
    self delete.repeat post.
     
  8. Ziras

    Ziras FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,514
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 14,962 / -0
    self delete. repeat post
     
  9. Ziras

    Ziras FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,514
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 14,962 / -0
    self delete. repeat post
     
  10. Sonic_boom

    Sonic_boom FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    310
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 279 / -0
    Pakistan is the most important country in the world right now
     
  11. asad71

    asad71 PROFESSIONAL

    Messages:
    6,864
    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Ratings:
    +10 / 5,931 / -6
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    Canada
    Pakistan must concentrate on becoming strong internally. The psychology of getting flattered because somebody has stated - totally for that country's self-interest, that Pakistan is needed, should be shunned. Instead Pakistan should be able to aim for a situation where she can say who she needs.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  12. nForce

    nForce ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,910
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7,928 / -5
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Okay... this thread is a little different since the OP has quoted an article by Noam Chomsky.I suggest people a pretty good idea about Chomsky,before they comment.The people of Pakistan may not actually agree with the school of thought to which Chomsky belongs,and I am quite sure most of the Indians apart from some educated in DU or Calcutta University,will agree with him as well.
     
  13. DelhiDareDevil

    DelhiDareDevil SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,245
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,019 / -0
    Pakistan should consider being a colony of China to help solve problems.
     
  14. Meengla

    Meengla SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,553
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Ratings:
    +9 / 4,209 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    In my opinion Chomsky's clearest insights are about the role of American-led media to 'manufacture consent'. Americans may take pride in their 'free' media but that freedom is mostly on domestic issues. When it comes to foreign affairs the main stream media is largely shallow in analyses, and uncritical of official explanations of events.
    Right after OBL raid, for example, it suited the Obama administration to pressurize Pakistan to 'do more'. While no presenting even an iota of evidence of Pakistan's 'complicity' the administration and its crony media allies went on full-steam to blame the Pakistani state itself. Believe me, most of the world would be singing a different tune had the Obama administration decided to highlight Pakistan's cooperation in general, and especially the ISI leads when eventually nabbed OBL. But that was not the desire. A different kind of 'consent' had to be manufactured. A most damaging one for the US-Pak relationship.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  15. 53fd

    53fd FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 7,291 / -0
    I agree, "Manufacturing Consent" was one of the most insightful books I have ever read. "Failed States" by Chomsky was another book I really liked.