What's new

US Military Top Secret Anti-Gravity Spacecraft TR-3B

LeGenD

MODERATOR
Aug 28, 2006
11,811
63
13,593
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Fiction

Reality F35 is over prized plane with system failiures
Bro, wake up.


F-35 variants are ready for combat and conducting sorties over contested spaces as we speak.

[1] https://www.defensenews.com/air/201...cts-airstrikes-with-f-35-for-first-time-ever/

[2] https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...35-flies-first-combat-mission-in-afghanistan/

[3] https://defence-blog.com/news/sourc...se-made-radar-during-airstrikes-in-syria.html

Cost-wise, F-35 variants are below 90 million USD per piece at present which is very low price for a jet of this caliber.

Russians failed to develop a jet of similar characteristics and capabilities whereas Chinese need to test their J-20 in combat situations.
 
Last edited:

LeGenD

MODERATOR
Aug 28, 2006
11,811
63
13,593
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
One sank in pacific few days back
Fault of the Japanese actually; the jet which crashed in the Pacific was 'Made in Japan'. Although the Japanese are renowned for their high quality manufacturing base and products, their aviation industry is lacking in comparison to American. Therefore, the Japanese have decided to import F-35 from US for now.

Now, should I highlight crashes of JF-17 Thunder and F-16 variants over the course of years? This is bad argument. Machines can be really good and reliable but not infallible just like humans.

Even solar objects are not infallible - our very own Sun will fail and collapse one day.
 
Last edited:

ps3linux

FULL MEMBER
Mar 4, 2019
906
32
2,770
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The US Navy secretly designed a super-fast futuristic aircraft resembling a UFO, documents reveal
Patent application is a very serious business in states, you don't apply for a patent unless you are absolutely sure that you will be able to make it work. Two tech in one

  1. Anti Gravity (the applications are unlimited)
  2. probably a working Alcubierre drive, or its predecessor. (same as above)
 

mike2000 is back

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 12, 2015
7,616
17
8,414
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
The US Navy secretly designed a super-fast futuristic aircraft resembling a UFO, documents reveal

Jasper HamillThursday
18 Apr 2019 6:51 pm


The US Navy has been granted a patent for an advanced aircraft which resembles a flying saucer UFO.

Military inventors filed plans for a highly unusual flying machine which uses an ‘inertial mass reduction device’ to travel at ‘extreme speeds’.

What that means is that the aircraft uses complex technology to reduce its mass and thereby lessen inertia (an object’s resistance to motion) so it can zoom along at high velocities.

The patent is highly complex and describes methods of reducing the mass of an aircraft using various techniques including the generation of gravity waves, which were first detected in 2016 after being produced when two black holes collided.







These drawings were filed as part of the patent and show a craft which looks a lot like a UFO (Photo: Salvatore Cezar Pais/ Google)


‘It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime,’ the patent says.


The craft described in the patent features a cavity wall filled with gas, which is then made to vibrate using powerful electromagnetic waves.

This then creates a vacuum around the craft, allowing it to propel itself at high speeds.

The UFO-style ship can be used in water, air or even space.

‘It is possible to envision a hybrid aerospace/undersea craft (HAUC), which due to the physical mechanisms enabled with the inertial mass reduction device, can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities,’ the patent continues.

‘This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath.’

Although the US Navy applied for the patent in 2016 and it was granted last year, it doesn’t necessarily mean the craft has been built and tested.

However, the technology is further evidence of the military’s interest in developing ‘exotic’ technologies.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that US government researchers investigated wormholes, antigravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drives and high energy laser weapons during a probe into ‘unexplained aerial phenomena’ called the Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AATIP).

Details of AATIP were first released in 2017, including reports of a sighting made by fighter pilots from the USS Nimitz.

These pilots saw a huge patch of churning, turbulent water the size of a Boeing 737, suggesting something was beneath the surface, as well as a ‘tic tac’ aircraft which zoomed off at almost impossibly high speeds.

We spoke to Nick Pope, former UFO investigator at the Ministry of Defence, and asked if he saw any similarities between the patented design and the Nimitz Tic Tac.

‘A hybrid craft, capable of flying both in the air and underwater, is uncannily similar to what was reported in the USS Nimitz incident from 2004,’ he said.

‘There was a similar incident of a UFO flying underwater in Puerto Rico in 2013. The possible connection between the USS Nimitz incident and this patent is intriguing, and it’s interesting that the US Navy seems to be the link here.

‘It’s possible that the patent is inspired by the incident and is part of an attempt to work out the technology behind the objects that were chased by the Navy F-18s. This is known as ‘reverse-engineering’.’

He said a ‘key question’ is how the plans fit in with the wider AATIP project.

In the latest patent, author Salvatore Cezar Pais mentions Harold Puthoff, a key figure in AATIP who commissioned the 38 papers exploring exotic technologies, which were then used by Defense Intelligence Agency durings briefings filed with the US Congress.

‘The papers that got media attention related to anti-gravity, invisibility cloaking, warp drive and wormholes, but a key point is that many of the papers relate to exotic propulsion systems – not just the technology that would enable us to build a faster aircraft, drone or missile, but the technology that we’d need for interstellar travel,’ Pope added.

‘These patents might be the first steps in taking humankind to the stars.’






A declassified document which gives details of some of the research papers produced by AATIP investigators

We asked if he believed the craft in the patent had ever been built.

This patent for a “craft using an inertial mass reduction device” is fascinating, and is one of three patents filed by US Navy scientist Salvatore Cezar Pais.

‘The other one of his patents that caught my eye was one for a “high-frequency gravitational wave generator”.

‘It’s sometimes hard to tell where the boundary lies between fringe science and science fiction. Furthermore, even if the theoretical physics turns out to be sound, aeronautical engineers still have to be able to build something, if any of this is to have any tangible effect.

‘If they have built the technology described in the patents, I’m sure the program is highly classified. The bottom line is that if any of this works, we’re in game-changing territory.’

https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/18/us-n...raft-resembling-ufo-documents-reveal-9246755/

Here is patent filed by US Navy

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Navy drafting new guidelines for reporting UFOs

The service says it has also 'provided a series of briefings by senior Naval Intelligence officials as well as aviators who reported hazards to aviation safety.'


By BRYAN BENDER


04/23/2019 06:06 PM EDT


Updated 04/23/2019 08:14 PM EDT

The U.S. Navy is drafting new guidelines for pilots and other personnel to report encounters with "unidentified aircraft," a significant new step in creating a formal process to collect and analyze the unexplained sightings — and destigmatize them.

The previously unreported move is in response to a series of sightings of unknown, highly advanced aircraft intruding on Navy strike groups and other sensitive military formations and facilities, the service says.


"There have been a number of reports of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft entering various military-controlled ranges and designated air space in recent years," the Navy said in a statement in response to questions from POLITICO. "For safety and security concerns, the Navy and the [U.S. Air Force] takes these reports very seriously and investigates each and every report.

"As part of this effort," it added, "the Navy is updating and formalizing the process by which reports of any such suspected incursions can be made to the cognizant authorities. A new message to the fleet that will detail the steps for reporting is in draft."

To be clear, the Navy isn’t endorsing the idea that its sailors have encountered alien spacecraft. But it is acknowledging there have been enough strange aerial sightings by credible and highly trained military personnel that they need to be recorded in the official record and studied — rather than dismissed as some kooky phenomena from the realm of science-fiction.

Chris Mellon, a former Pentagon intelligence official and ex-staffer on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said establishing a more formal means of reporting what the military now calls "unexplained aerial phenomena" — rather than "unidentified flying objects" — would be a “sea change.”

“Right now, we have situation in which UFOs and UAPs are treated as anomalies to be ignored rather than anomalies to be explored,” he said. “We have systems that exclude that information and dump it.”

For example, Mellon said “in a lot of cases [military personnel] don’t know what to do with that information — like satellite data or a radar that sees something going Mach 3. They will dump [the data] because that is not a traditional aircraft or missile.”

The development comes amid growing interest from members of Congress following revelations by POLITICO and the New York Times in late 2017 that the Pentagon established a dedicated office inside the Defense Intelligence Agency to study UAPs at the urging of several senators who secretly set aside appropriations for the effort.

That office spent some $25 million conducting a series of technical studies and evaluating numerous unexplained incursions, including one that lasted several days involving the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group in 2004. In that case, Navy fighter jets were outmaneuvered by unidentified aircraft that flew in ways that appeared to defy the laws of known physics.

Raytheon, a leading defense contractor, used the reports and official Defense Department video of the sightings off the coast of California to hail one of its radar systems for capturing the phenomena.

The Pentagon's UFO research office, known as the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, was officially wound down in 2012 when the congressional earmark ran out.

But more lawmakers are now asking questions, the Navy also reports.

"In response to requests for information from Congressional members and staff, Navy officials have provided a series of briefings by senior Naval Intelligence officials as well as aviators who reported hazards to aviation safety," the service said in its statement to POLITICO.

The Navy declined to identify who has been briefed, nor would it provide more details on the guidelines for reporting that are being drafted for the fleet. The Air Force did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advocates for treating such sightings as a potential national security threat have long criticized military leaders for giving the phenomenon relatively little attention and for encouraging a culture in which personnel feel that speaking up about it could hurt their career.

Luis Elizondo, the former Pentagon official who ran the so-called AATIP office, complained after he retired from government service that the Pentagon's approach to these unidentified aircraft has been far too blasé.

"If you are in a busy airport and see something you are supposed to say something," Elizondo said. "With our own military members it is kind of the opposite: 'If you do see something, don't say something.'"

He added that because these mysterious aircraft "don't have a tail number or a flag — in some cases not even a tail — it's crickets. What happens in five years if it turns out these are extremely advanced Russian aircraft?"

Elizondo will be featured in an upcoming documentary series about the Pentagon UFO research he oversaw. He said the six-part series will reveal more recent sightings of UAPs by dozens of military pilots.

Both Elizondo and Mellon are involved with the To The Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences, which supports research into explaining the technical advances these reported UAPs demonstrate.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/23/us-navy-guidelines-reporting-ufos-1375290

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Navy Pilot Says UFO He Saw Off California Was ‘Not of This World’


BY BILLY PERRIGO
DECEMBER 19, 2017


A former Navy pilot has opened up about an otherworldly experience he says he experienced in 2004. His testimony comes just days after the Pentagon officially revealed the existence of a secret office investigating the existence of UFOs.

Cmdr. David Fravor, a former squadron leader who worked as a Navy pilot for 18 years, said on Monday he was on a routine training mission off the coast of California in 2004 when his unit was directed to go and examine strange unidentified objects that were descending from 80,000 to 20,000 feet, and then disappearing.

Upon flying 60 miles to the location, Fravor says he saw a tic-tac shaped object, “40 feet long with no wings, just hanging close to the water,” in an interview with the Washington Post on Monday. He said it created a disturbance on the water uncharacteristic of a helicopter or a plane, and moved rapidly.

“As I get closer, as my nose is starting to pull back up, it accelerates and it’s gone,” he told the Post. “Faster than I’d ever seen anything in my life. We turn around, say let’s go see what’s in the water and there’s nothing. Just blue water.”

“I can tell you, I think it was not from this world,” Fravor told ABC News, also on Monday. “I’m not crazy, haven’t been drinking. It was — after 18 years of flying, I’ve seen pretty much about everything that I can see in that realm, and this was nothing close.”


Interest in Fravor’s story has surged now that the Pentagon’s information is in the public realm. A video of the encounter Fravor describes is included in a cache of three videos cleared on Saturday for public viewing, which appear to show encounters between military pilots and what the Pentagon calls “anomalous aerial vehicles.”

The Pentagon said funding for its Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program lasted from 2007 to 2012, and took up just $22 million of the Department of Defense’s $600 billion budget, the New York Times reported.


Official UAP Footage from the USG for Public Release
http://time.com/5070962/navy-pilot-ufo-california-not-from-this-world/
@LeGenD
Damn...the US always sets the trend on many fields.
 

Reddington

FULL MEMBER
Feb 22, 2019
1,022
15
2,787
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
‘Wow, What Is That?’ Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects

“These things would be out there all day,” Lt. Ryan Graves said. “Keeping an aircraft in the air requires a significant amount of energy. With the speeds we observed, 12 hours in the air is 11 hours longer than we’d expect.”CreditTony Luong for The New York Times

“These things would be out there all day,” Lt. Ryan Graves said. “Keeping an aircraft in the air requires a significant amount of energy. With the speeds we observed, 12 hours in the air is 11 hours longer than we’d expect.”CreditCreditTony Luong for The New York Times


By Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean

May 26, 2019

Leer en español


WASHINGTON — The strange objects, one of them like a spinning top moving against the wind, appeared almost daily from the summer of 2014 to March 2015, high in the skies over the East Coast. Navy pilots reported to their superiors that the objects had no visible engine or infrared exhaust plumes, but that they could reach 30,000 feet and hypersonic speeds.

“These things would be out there all day,” said Lt. Ryan Graves, an F/A-18 Super Hornet pilot who has been with the Navy for 10 years, and who reported his sightings to the Pentagon and Congress. “Keeping an aircraft in the air requires a significant amount of energy. With the speeds we observed, 12 hours in the air is 11 hours longer than we’d expect.”

In late 2014, a Super Hornet pilot had a near collision with one of the objects, and an official mishap report was filed. Some of the incidents were videotaped, including one taken by a plane’s camera in early 2015 that shows an object zooming over the ocean waves as pilots question what they are watching.

“Wow, what is that, man?” one exclaims. “Look at it fly!”

No one in the Defense Department is saying that the objects were extraterrestrial, and experts emphasize that earthly explanations can generally be found for such incidents. Lieutenant Graves and four other Navy pilots, who said in interviews with The New York Times that they saw the objects in 2014 and 2015 in training maneuvers from Virginia to Florida off the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, make no assertions of their provenance.

But the objects have gotten the attention of the Navy, which earlier this year sent out new classified guidance for how to report what the military calls unexplained aerial phenomena, or unidentified flying objects.

Joseph Gradisher, a Navy spokesman, said the new guidance was an update of instructions that went out to the fleet in 2015, after the Roosevelt incidents.

“There were a number of different reports,” he said. Some cases could have been commercial drones, he said, but in other cases “we don’t know who’s doing this, we don’t have enough data to track this. So the intent of the message to the fleet is to provide updated guidance on reporting procedures for suspected intrusions into our airspace.”

The sightings were reported to the Pentagon’s shadowy, little-known Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, which analyzed the radar data, video footage and accounts provided by senior officers from the Roosevelt. Luis Elizondo, a military intelligence official who ran the program until he resigned in 2017, called the sightings “a striking series of incidents.”



Navy pilots from the VFA-11 “Red Rippers” squadron aboard the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt in 2015. The squadron began noticing strange objects just after the Navy upgraded the radar systems on its F/A-18 fighter planes.CreditAdam Ferguson for The New York Times


The program, which began in 2007 and was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat who was the Senate majority leader at the time, was officially shut down in 2012 when the money dried up, according to the Pentagon. But the Navy recently said it currently investigates military reports of U.F.O.s, and Mr. Elizondo and other participants say the program — parts of it remain classified — has continued in other forms. The program has also studied video that shows a whitish oval object described as a giant Tic Tac, about the size of a commercial plane, encountered by two Navy fighter jets off the coast of San Diego in 2004.


Leon Golub, a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said the possibility of an extraterrestrial cause “is so unlikely that it competes with many other low-probability but more mundane explanations.” He added that “there are so many other possibilities — bugs in the code for the imaging and display systems, atmospheric effects and reflections, neurological overload from multiple inputs during high-speed flight.”

Lieutenant Graves still cannot explain what he saw. In the summer of 2014, he and Lt. Danny Accoin, another Super Hornet pilot, were part of a squadron, the VFA-11 “Red Rippers” out of Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., that was training for a deployment to the Persian Gulf.

Lieutenants Graves and Accoin spoke on the record to The Times about the objects. Three other pilots in the squadron also spoke to The Times about the objects but declined to be named.

Lieutenants Graves and Accoin, along with former American intelligence officials, appear in a six-part History Channel series, “Unidentified: Inside America’s U.F.O. Investigation,” to air beginning Friday. The Times conducted separate interviews with key participants.

The pilots began noticing the objects after their 1980s-era radar was upgraded to a more advanced system. As one fighter jet after another got the new radar, pilots began picking up the objects, but ignoring what they thought were false radar tracks.

“People have seen strange stuff in military aircraft for decades,” Lieutenant Graves said. “We’re doing this very complex mission, to go from 30,000 feet, diving down. It would be a pretty big deal to have something up there.”

But he said the objects persisted, showing up at 30,000 feet, 20,000 feet, even sea level. They could accelerate, slow down and then hit hypersonic speeds.

Lieutenant Accoin said he interacted twice with the objects. The first time, after picking up the object on his radar, he set his plane to merge with it, flying 1,000 feet below it. He said he should have been able to see it with his helmet camera, but could not, even though his radar told him it was there.

A few days later, Lieutenant Accoin said a training missile on his jet locked on the object and his infrared camera picked it up as well. “I knew I had it, I knew it was not a false hit,” he said. But still, “I could not pick it up visually.”

At this point the pilots said they speculated that the objects were part of some classified and extremely advanced drone program.



Lieutenant Graves with Navy flight log books.CreditTony Luong for The New York Times
But then pilots began seeing the objects. In late 2014, Lieutenant Graves said he was back at base in Virginia Beach when he encountered a squadron mate just back from a mission “with a look of shock on his face.”


He said he was stunned to hear the pilot’s words. “I almost hit one of those things,” the pilot told Lieutenant Graves.

The pilot and his wingman were flying in tandem about 100 feet apart over the Atlantic east of Virginia Beach when something flew between them, right past the cockpit. It looked to the pilot, Lieutenant Graves said, like a sphere encasing a cube.

The incident so spooked the squadron that an aviation flight safety report was filed, Lieutenant Graves said.

The near miss, he and other pilots interviewed said, angered the squadron, and convinced them that the objects were not part of a classified drone program. Government officials would know fighter pilots were training in the area, they reasoned, and would not send drones to get in the way.

“It turned from a potentially classified drone program to a safety issue,” Lieutenant Graves said. “It was going to be a matter of time before someone had a midair” collision.

What was strange, the pilots said, was that the video showed objects accelerating to hypersonic speed, making sudden stops and instantaneous turns — something beyond the physical limits of a human crew.


“Speed doesn’t kill you,” Lieutenant Graves said. “Stopping does. Or acceleration.”

Asked what they thought the objects were, the pilots refused to speculate.

“We have helicopters that can hover,” Lieutenant Graves said. “We have aircraft that can fly at 30,000 feet and right at the surface.” But “combine all that in one vehicle of some type with no jet engine, no exhaust plume.”

Lieutenant Accoin said only that “we’re here to do a job, with excellence, not make up myths.”

In March 2015 the Roosevelt left the coast of Florida and headed to the Persian Gulf as part of the American-led mission fighting the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The same pilots who were interacting with the strange objects off the East Coast were soon doing bombing missions over Iraq and Syria.

The incidents tapered off after they left the United States, the pilots said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/26/us/politics/ufo-sightings-navy-pilots.html


Pilots report encounters with high-flying objects
 

jamahir

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 9, 2014
21,261
17
19,264
Country
India
Location
India

RealNapster

SENIOR MEMBER
May 6, 2015
6,279
5
11,826
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
That thing is impossibe but this one in the OP seems promising... except

can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities
I amnot sure how will it remain submerged, traveling fast, and still stealth ?? Our all currently available sound reducing techniques only work for a submarine that travels no more then 30-35 knots per hour. More then that and its too noisy.
 

jamahir

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 9, 2014
21,261
17
19,264
Country
India
Location
India
That thing is impossibe
Well, the Chinese seem to be interested in it.

but this one in the OP seems promising
Okay.

... except

I amnot sure how will it remain submerged, traveling fast, and still stealth ?? Our all currently available sound reducing techniques only work for a submarine that travels no more then 30-35 knots per hour. More then that and its too noisy.
Isn't there something called Super-cavitation ?? Or is that something else ??
 
Last edited:

Reddington

FULL MEMBER
Feb 22, 2019
1,022
15
2,787
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Reminds me of the EmDrive.
This is different from EM Drive. EM Drive works by bouncing microwave photons back and forth inside a cone-shaped closed metal cavity. That motion causes the the EM Drive to generate thrust, and propel the drive in the opposite direction.
You could say that this is an electrogravitic drive.
 

RealNapster

SENIOR MEMBER
May 6, 2015
6,279
5
11,826
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Well, the Chinese seem to be interested in it.
They (humans) all do even previously failed things just to learn. No body seems to learn from others mistakes we all want to do our own.

Isn't there something called Super-cavitation ?? Or is that something else ??
I had to google it. Well the concept is rarely applied in torpedoes. Torpedoes are very small in size and have straight body, as compare to a huge submarine. Well it work for this huge body ??
 

Reddington

FULL MEMBER
Feb 22, 2019
1,022
15
2,787
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

US Navy confirms multiple UFO videos are real| CCTV English


US Navy admits that leaked videos of UFO sightings are real and shouldn’t have been made public
 

StormBreaker

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 18, 2019
5,118
16
9,076
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Yeah. I have, in my free time, researched on many mind blowing techs DARPA might be working on.

One of the research work being done by DARPA is called Einstein–Rosen bridge also called wormhole where you can move from one point to another point in space without crossing the space between.
And if applied in a specified manner, could also be used to have time travel. Just like in Sci-fi movies.

Mind Boggling!!!!!!!
But for Einstein rosen bridge to be existent in non-fiction, still they have to create a wormhole in space using directed energy similar to of sun
 

YeBeWarned

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 25, 2016
16,924
11
24,190
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
But for Einstein rosen bridge to be existent in non-fiction, still they have to create a wormhole in space using directed energy similar to of sun
CERN might be able to make them in their particle accelerator , Warm holes are still on theory that too very weak because their existence are very narrow and timely short, the real deal is to keep a warm hole open and wide enough to let any matter pass . I don't even want to know what would a black hole would do haha
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom