What's new

US Army chooses the V-280 to replace the Black Hawk helicopter

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 19, 2014
14,646
3
20,174
Country
United States
Location
United States


1670279447070.png
 

gambit

PROFESSIONAL
Apr 28, 2009
27,724
147
25,817
Country
United States
Location
United States
This will make Army pilots shall we say 'better' than regular pilots because now Army pilots will have two set of piloting skills: that of rotary wings when the 280 upturn its props and that of fixed wings when the props are horizontal. They are going to rub it in, for sure. :lol:
 

One_Nation

FULL MEMBER
Sep 3, 2021
1,275
-2
1,043
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
There are members here turning blue explaining how superior Blackhawk is to competition due to "painful" evolution.
Why would they want to replace an un-paralleled machine?
 

gambit

PROFESSIONAL
Apr 28, 2009
27,724
147
25,817
Country
United States
Location
United States
There are members here turning blue explaining how superior Blackhawk is to competition due to "painful" evolution.
Why would they want to replace an un-paralleled machine?
When the jet engine came out, some predicted the end of the prop jobbers. Did not happened. Same will be for the helos.
 

SQ8

INACTIVE
Mar 28, 2009
40,424
508
90,219
Country
United States
Location
United States
I have read somewhere that the complete UH-60 fleet is not going to be replaced, but the FLRAA is supposed to augment the UH-60 fleet and plug in the gaps where they are (more specifically keeping in mind the Chinese threat.
It is likely that the numbers may end up limited to 1000 - with newer Uh-60 variants still in service 40-50 years from now. But that is still not a small number because then exports will take over.

I’m now curious to see what they select for FARA - it is possible they may divide that contract because that is how that industry operates and not all eggs are put in one basket.
 

Jango

SENIOR MODERATOR
Sep 12, 2010
19,907
69
28,144
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
I’m now curious to see what they select for FARA - it is possible they may divide that contract because that is how that industry operates and not all eggs are put in one basket.

Which is why all publications and forums indicate that the Sikorsky design is in the lead.

But that also has something to do with the US Army going for a change in design of their platforms, focusing more on the tilt rotor (or the combined rotor concept with a pusher prop and a coaxial rotor).
 

FuturePAF

ELITE MEMBER
Dec 17, 2014
8,735
23
9,576
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
It is likely that the numbers may end up limited to 1000 - with newer Uh-60 variants still in service 40-50 years from now. But that is still not a small number because then exports will take over.

I’m now curious to see what they select for FARA - it is possible they may divide that contract because that is how that industry operates and not all eggs are put in one basket.
They need to keep both major helicopter manufacturers viable with enough work and funding so R&D projects remain competitive for decades to come. It’s probably also why we saw Northrop get the B-21 program while Lockheed makes fighters.
 

SQ8

INACTIVE
Mar 28, 2009
40,424
508
90,219
Country
United States
Location
United States
They need to keep both major helicopter manufacturers viable with enough work and funding so R&D projects remain competitive for decades to come. It’s probably also why we saw Northrop get the B-21 program while Lockheed makes fighters.
Happened before too - F-22 vs YF-23 w.r.t B2
 

Metal 0-1

FULL MEMBER
Aug 14, 2016
1,970
12
2,080
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
That's Ridiculous. V-280 looks absolute dogshit.
Doesn't even have the same combat radius than a Blackhawk.

Muh Based Blackhawks
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom