yes because the Chinese carrier is battle proven right?Lets hope some floating U.S. shipwreck doesnt just end up polluting the waters and endanger the natural environment again.
designed in 1980s and yes China have a Casino carrierOld Casino Aircraft Carrier????
So many ignorant trolls in here.
Nearly died laughing.
actually yes the America Class can carry 24 x F35BUS Navy light carrier actually had a more potent air wing than China's conventional carriers?????
Yes because copy of Su33 which even Russian scrapped called J15 is better than F35 right, this is what your government tells youIMO F-35 especially its B variant is overly rated and expensive to maintain toys even USN is rejecting today.
They are beginning to fall apart from front landing carriage wheel, panels, sensors, etc.
A design issue means that the Navy's and Marine Corp's F-35 versions will have some limits imposed on supersonic flights. (Samuel King Jr./U.S. Air Force)
Pilots are advised not to fly supersonic to avoid damage and deterioration to the plane composites.
That was mere optics.US destroyers obsolete in front of SU-24 frying those electronics
Your ignorance is showing but I guess it is blissful in your case.Yes because copy of Su33 which even Russian scrapped called J15 is better than F35 right, this is what your government tells you
But in a free and fair world we have right information
Not state sponsored fanboy media
show me photo of J35 for naval operations?Anyway J-15 will be gradually replaced by a new fifth generation Naval J-35 equipped with catapult compatible nose gear once the EMALS CV-03 Aircraft Carrier is ready.
Comparing a predated SU-33 to J-15 is like comparing SU-27 to SU-35.
Even the internal structure of the airframe is different. Not to mention the avionic suite and a new airborne FCS AESA radar.
The J-15 is a deadly junk versus another modern F-35 junk with a limited payload and limited combat range of 455 km.
show me photo of J35 for naval operations?
while Chinese fanboys are dreaming US has operational hundreds of F35
As I told you I don't normally debate with trolls.
Certainly not with one as low calibre as you.
If you have not been barking incessantly, you would have noticed that there is a ongoing discussion among educated and knowledgeable members about a naval version of the J-31 FGFA nicknamed J-35.
From an article in a Western Magazine dated June 30, 2020 by Kyle Mizokami.
"According to Global Times, the social media post was later deleted without explanation. A Chinese aviation expert interviewed by the site believes the fighter is designed to operate from China’s fleet of aircraft carriers.
The leading contender for the new fighter, currently referred to as “J-35,” is a production-ready version of Shenyang FC-31 technology demonstrator."
So you see it is relatively easy to bust your accusation.
The J-35 is not fanboys dream as you are once again alleged as models of J-31 has been displayed at various Airshows and exhibitions starting 2012 first as a concept.
Various prototypes have been built eversince with rumor In Sept 2020 of a J-35 undergoing static testing by Hui Tong.
You do know who is Hui Tong? right.
this is not a naval variant
UFO spotted in China. Experts nicknamed this UFO J-31.
Didn't you just claimed the J-31 only existed as a model and a Chinese fanboy dream. Stop deviating and wasting our time.this is not a naval variant
where is the arrestor gear where is the folding wings, where is the naval coating
show me the naval variant this is not naval variant
or maybe Chinese fanboys are calling this demonstrator a naval variant which is clearly not true