What's new

US and China deploy aircraft carriers in South China Sea as tensions simmer

aziqbal

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Aug 26, 2010
3,498
9
5,525
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Lets hope some floating U.S. shipwreck doesnt just end up polluting the waters and endanger the natural environment again.
yes because the Chinese carrier is battle proven right?

has it ever conducted a deterrence patrol

a Single USN can wipe the floor with both Chinese copied Russian carriers CV-16 and CV-17 which have giant J15

USN has F35B+ F18 E/F and 64 In total on a single Carrier with availability to carry up to 96 fighters

how many fighters CV-16 have 13 x J15 with limited range and payload?

where is your Carrier AWACS?

Chinese Carrier has never even conducted VERTREP

Chinese will make complete fools of themselves of they try to face USN

This is why USN can sail to South China Sea but China cannot reach Western Pacific
Old Casino Aircraft Carrier????
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

So many ignorant trolls in here.
Nearly died laughing.

Obsolete???
:omghaha: :omghaha:
:omghaha:
designed in 1980s and yes China have a Casino carrier

US Navy light carrier actually had a more potent air wing than China's conventional carriers?????

:omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:
actually yes the America Class can carry 24 x F35B

CV-16 carry only 13 x J15 which is old copy of Su33

so America Class has 4 times the fire power of a Chinese Carrier

and America Class is actually a amphibious assault ship

so yes a USN amphibious assault ship is more powerful than a Chinese carrier
 

CAPRICORN-88

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2015
3,078
-5
5,955
Country
Singapore
Location
Malaysia
IMO F-35 especially its B variant is overly rated and expensive to maintain toys even USN is rejecting today.

They are beginning to fall apart from front landing carriage wheel, panels, sensors, etc.

A design issue means that the Navy's and Marine Corp's F-35 versions will have some limits imposed on supersonic flights. (Samuel King Jr./U.S. Air Force)
Pilots are advised not to fly supersonic to avoid damage and deterioration to the plane composites.

:coffee:
 

aziqbal

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Aug 26, 2010
3,498
9
5,525
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
IMO F-35 especially its B variant is overly rated and expensive to maintain toys even USN is rejecting today.

They are beginning to fall apart from front landing carriage wheel, panels, sensors, etc.

A design issue means that the Navy's and Marine Corp's F-35 versions will have some limits imposed on supersonic flights. (Samuel King Jr./U.S. Air Force)
Pilots are advised not to fly supersonic to avoid damage and deterioration to the plane composites.

:coffee:
Yes because copy of Su33 which even Russian scrapped called J15 is better than F35 right, this is what your government tells you

But in a free and fair world we have right information

Not state sponsored fanboy media
 

CAPRICORN-88

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2015
3,078
-5
5,955
Country
Singapore
Location
Malaysia
Yes because copy of Su33 which even Russian scrapped called J15 is better than F35 right, this is what your government tells you

But in a free and fair world we have right information

Not state sponsored fanboy media
Your ignorance is showing but I guess it is blissful in your case.

You were much better off if you have kept your silence.

I don't waste my time with fact and knowledge lacking troll. :coffee:
 

CAPRICORN-88

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2015
3,078
-5
5,955
Country
Singapore
Location
Malaysia
Anyway J-15 will be gradually replaced by a new fifth generation Naval J-35 equipped with catapult compatible nose gear once the EMALS CV-03 Aircraft Carrier is ready.

Comparing a predated SU-33 to J-15 is like comparing SU-27 to SU-35.


:sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:

Even the internal structure of the airframe is different. Not to mention the avionic suite and a new airborne FCS AESA radar.
The J-15 is a deadly junk versus another modern F-35 junk with a limited payload and limited combat range of 455 km.
 
Last edited:

aziqbal

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Aug 26, 2010
3,498
9
5,525
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Anyway J-15 will be gradually replaced by a new fifth generation Naval J-35 equipped with catapult compatible nose gear once the EMALS CV-03 Aircraft Carrier is ready.

Comparing a predated SU-33 to J-15 is like comparing SU-27 to SU-35.


:sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:

Even the internal structure of the airframe is different. Not to mention the avionic suite and a new airborne FCS AESA radar.
The J-15 is a deadly junk versus another modern F-35 junk with a limited payload and limited combat range of 455 km.
show me photo of J35 for naval operations?

while Chinese fanboys are dreaming US has operational hundreds of F35
 

CAPRICORN-88

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2015
3,078
-5
5,955
Country
Singapore
Location
Malaysia
show me photo of J35 for naval operations?

while Chinese fanboys are dreaming US has operational hundreds of F35
:coffee: :nono:
As I told you I don't normally debate with trolls.
Certainly not with one as low calibre as you.

If you have not been barking incessantly, you would have noticed that there is a ongoing discussion among educated and knowledgeable members about a naval version of the J-31 FGFA nicknamed J-35.


From an article in a Western Magazine dated June 30, 2020 by Kyle Mizokami.
"According to Global Times, the social media post was later deleted without explanation. A Chinese aviation expert interviewed by the site believes the fighter is designed to operate from China’s fleet of aircraft carriers.

The leading contender for the new fighter, currently referred to as “J-35,” is a production-ready version of Shenyang FC-31 technology demonstrator."

So you see it is relatively easy to bust your accusation.
The J-35 is not fanboys dream as you are once again alleged as models of J-31 has been displayed at various Airshows and exhibitions starting 2012 first as a concept.
Various prototypes have been built eversince with rumor In Sept 2020 of a J-35 undergoing static testing by Hui Tong.
You do know who is Hui Tong? right.
 
Last edited:

aziqbal

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Aug 26, 2010
3,498
9
5,525
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
:coffee: :nono:
As I told you I don't normally debate with trolls.
Certainly not with one as low calibre as you.

If you have not been barking incessantly, you would have noticed that there is a ongoing discussion among educated and knowledgeable members about a naval version of the J-31 FGFA nicknamed J-35.


From an article in a Western Magazine dated June 30, 2020 by Kyle Mizokami.
"According to Global Times, the social media post was later deleted without explanation. A Chinese aviation expert interviewed by the site believes the fighter is designed to operate from China’s fleet of aircraft carriers.

The leading contender for the new fighter, currently referred to as “J-35,” is a production-ready version of Shenyang FC-31 technology demonstrator."

So you see it is relatively easy to bust your accusation.
The J-35 is not fanboys dream as you are once again alleged as models of J-31 has been displayed at various Airshows and exhibitions starting 2012 first as a concept.
Various prototypes have been built eversince with rumor In Sept 2020 of a J-35 undergoing static testing by Hui Tong.
You do know who is Hui Tong? right.

That’s for confirming that J31 is only existing as a toy model
 

aziqbal

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Aug 26, 2010
3,498
9
5,525
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom


UFO spotted in China. Experts nicknamed this UFO J-31.

:omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:
this is not a naval variant


where is the arrestor gear where is the folding wings, where is the naval coating

show me the naval variant this is not naval variant

or maybe Chinese fanboys are calling this demonstrator a naval variant which is clearly not true
 

CAPRICORN-88

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2015
3,078
-5
5,955
Country
Singapore
Location
Malaysia
this is not a naval variant


where is the arrestor gear where is the folding wings, where is the naval coating

show me the naval variant this is not naval variant

or maybe Chinese fanboys are calling this demonstrator a naval variant which is clearly not true
Didn't you just claimed the J-31 only existed as a model and a Chinese fanboy dream. Stop deviating and wasting our time.

So you think you are in a striptease show and can demand to watch everything in detail or throw a tantrum.

This is China military secret, dude, a hint is all you can get at this moment.
This video is the closest and best compilation you can ever get to.
Don't be greedy or are you still in denial and in a daze.
:omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:

 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom