What's new

Tyrian White case: IHC larger bench to hear plea seeking Imran Khan’s disqualification

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 26, 2018
15,508
13
32,445
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
469617_9986067_updates.jpg

  • Imran Khan provided incorrect information to ECP, says petitioner.
  • PTI chief concealed his alleged daughter Tyrian Jade White in his nomination papers for 2018 elections.
  • Applicant pleads with court to disqualify Khan under Article 62(i)(f) of Constitution.
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday constituted a three-member larger bench to hear a plea seeking disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan for concealing information regarding his alleged daughter Tyrian Jade White in his nomination papers for the 2018 elections.
The three-judge bench, headed by IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and comprising Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, will take up the petition on Thursday (February 9).
In his petition, Mohammad Sajid — a citizen — said that Imran Khan provided incorrect information while submitting his nomination papers for the general elections held in 2018. The petitioner also said that even though the former prime minister has three children, he had mentioned only two in the papers and concealed the existence of his third child.
He also pleaded with the court to disqualify Khan under Article 62(i)(f) of the constitution.
It is pertinent to mention here that the IHC decided to shift the case to the larger bench after objections were raised against the single-member bench.
On February 1, the PTI chairman filed a plea to dismiss the disqualification petition against him submitted in the IHC for "hiding" his alleged daughter in the nomination papers.
The response stated that the IHC’s four judges had previously excused themselves from hearing the matter.
According to the petition, the former prime minister no longer holds office as a member of the National Assembly, which is why the application is not admissible. Within the Constitutional jurisdiction, the federal capital’s top court cannot review any affidavit of Khan, the petition states.
In the written reply, the deposed prime minister — whose government was ousted in April last year following a no-confidence motion — did not respond to any of the allegations levelled in the petition regarding him being Tyrian’s father.
Khan neither confirmed nor denied being her father. He instead raised an indirect objection to the serving chief justice hearing the case.
The incumbent top judge of the IHC had also earlier excused from hearing the case on August 1, 2018. "A judge who has previously excused himself from a case cannot hear it again," Khan had raised the objection in his preliminary written response submitted in the court.
 

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
May 21, 2006
32,246
14
33,300
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
469617_9986067_updates.jpg

  • Imran Khan provided incorrect information to ECP, says petitioner.
  • PTI chief concealed his alleged daughter Tyrian Jade White in his nomination papers for 2018 elections.
  • Applicant pleads with court to disqualify Khan under Article 62(i)(f) of Constitution.
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday constituted a three-member larger bench to hear a plea seeking disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan for concealing information regarding his alleged daughter Tyrian Jade White in his nomination papers for the 2018 elections.
The three-judge bench, headed by IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and comprising Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, will take up the petition on Thursday (February 9).
In his petition, Mohammad Sajid — a citizen — said that Imran Khan provided incorrect information while submitting his nomination papers for the general elections held in 2018. The petitioner also said that even though the former prime minister has three children, he had mentioned only two in the papers and concealed the existence of his third child.
He also pleaded with the court to disqualify Khan under Article 62(i)(f) of the constitution.
It is pertinent to mention here that the IHC decided to shift the case to the larger bench after objections were raised against the single-member bench.
On February 1, the PTI chairman filed a plea to dismiss the disqualification petition against him submitted in the IHC for "hiding" his alleged daughter in the nomination papers.
The response stated that the IHC’s four judges had previously excused themselves from hearing the matter.
According to the petition, the former prime minister no longer holds office as a member of the National Assembly, which is why the application is not admissible. Within the Constitutional jurisdiction, the federal capital’s top court cannot review any affidavit of Khan, the petition states.
In the written reply, the deposed prime minister — whose government was ousted in April last year following a no-confidence motion — did not respond to any of the allegations levelled in the petition regarding him being Tyrian’s father.
Khan neither confirmed nor denied being her father. He instead raised an indirect objection to the serving chief justice hearing the case.
The incumbent top judge of the IHC had also earlier excused from hearing the case on August 1, 2018. "A judge who has previously excused himself from a case cannot hear it again," Khan had raised the objection in his preliminary written response submitted in the court.
Under Islamic jurisprudence, this case is wrong. No one can raise the question about a parental issue, only if the child or adult him or her raises this issue.
That is the reason, PMLN has no respect in an educated circle. They always attack opponents' personal life.
Few months ago Toshakhana hype , when Court ask to produce everyone's record ..PMLN said this is a "state secret " and can't disclose... loll .. extreme hypocritic..
 
Last edited:

VCheng

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 29, 2010
48,391
57
40,643
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States

But that has nothing to do with the question I asked.

Besides, this is the same court:


Please note that dates.
 

M. Sarmad

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 27, 2013
6,789
62
12,636
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Legally speaking, an ex-parte judgement by a US court has absolutely zero legal value in Pakistan

And under Pakistani law, DNA paternity tests can only be taken voluntarily. (Similar position is held by Hanafi jurists)

Even Patwaris' favorite judge Qazi Faiz Isa in his SC judgements has maintained that forced DNA paternity tests are a violation of the article 14 of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

So, all IK has to do is to refuse any DNA paternity tests (on whatever context) and PDM have no case against him ..

But Pakistan courts are not independent and judgements/orders in such cases are usually 'typed' in the GHQ
 

RoadRunner401

SENIOR MEMBER
May 28, 2015
3,595
0
3,703
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Mohammad Sajid — Must provide paternity test as I citizen of Pakistan believe his Father Could be Nawaz sharif, shebaz sharif, Rana sanaullah or MIR Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman it is My right as citizen of Pakistan to confirm his identity before he is allowed in Pakistan
What do the words "sadeeq" and "ameen" mean, if I may ask?
LET, me Answer with This


:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 

M. Sarmad

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 27, 2013
6,789
62
12,636
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
But he was the one who appointed his ex-wife as the legal guardian for Tyrian after a family court in LA county duly recognized his parental rights. The paperwork exists.

Jemima was nominated as the guardian by Sita White in her will but Jemima refused to take up the guardianship. IK didn't give any declaration in any court nor has he ever accepted Tyrian as his daughter in any documents
 
Last edited:

VCheng

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 29, 2010
48,391
57
40,643
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Jemima was nominated as the guardian by Sita White in her will but Jemima refused to take up the guardianship. IK didn't give any declaration in any court nor has he ever accepted Tyrian as her daughter in any documents

Excellent then. That evidence won't matter, as some may hope, but then again, Pakistani courts have their own ways.
 

imadul

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 7, 2007
3,393
0
4,468
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
It is mudslinging by PDM.
Handlers instructing IHC especially the CJ Amer.
They just want to defame.
IK says he has a life before.
PDM and Dirty Harry's of military Inc shall still be defeated.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom