This rebuttal makes this all very suspicious.
My guess is that it was a 'leak', hence the rebuttal i mean no wonder why, this is EXTREMELY contentious, anyways it's not fake per se. It's been openly talked about ever since the fall of Kabul since these are TTP demands, but let's see what comes out of the new rounds of negotiations.
The first 4 purportedly accepted demands make sense as Pakistan has wanted to reduce forces there for a while, they can't keep so many forces tied down there. Sharia has been something Pakistan is fully ready to accept thought it was reluctant at first during the first round of negotiations when Kabul freshly fell. I don't know what Nizam-e-Adl is but i am guessing it pertains to law? Pakistan's original red line was that all terrorists who participated in 'major' attacks (i am recalling from memory so may be erroneous) be tried however that has shifted, it was never feasible to begin with.
One thing that is creating immense pressure on the negotiating team i am guessing is the closing window, you see the golden hour is running out where TTP is not strong enough to wage the war it wants and Pakistan has more leverage on the Taliban. But that is changing day by day, contrary to the claims of TTP fracturing there have been regular reunifications and absorbing of militias/factions at a steady pace signifying their growing strength. So like i said last year on the thread of the Fall of Kabul, time is not on our side.
