• Saturday, December 14, 2019

The Zionist Plan For Arab Countries And Middle East

Discussion in 'Middle East & Africa' started by Aramagedon, Oct 11, 2018.

  1. Aramagedon

    Aramagedon SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,204
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Ratings:
    +4 / 11,930 / -14
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Introduction

    The following document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government, the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. (article first published by Global Research on April 29, 2013).

    President Donald Trump has confirmed in no uncertain terms, his support of Israel’s illegal settlements (including his opposition to UN Security Council Resolution 2334, pertaining to the illegality of the Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank).

    Moreover, by moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and allowing for the expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories and beyond, the US president has provided a de facto endorsement of the “Greater Israel” project as formulated under the Yinon Plan.

    Bear in mind: this design is not strictly a Zionist Project for the Middle East, it is an integral part of US foreign policy, namely Washington’s intent to fracture and balkanize the Middle East. Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital is intended to trigger political instability throughout the region.

    According to the founding father of ZionismTheodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”


    When viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist Plan for the Middle East bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing wars on Syria, Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in Saudi Arabia.

    The “Greater Israel” project consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of a US-Israeli expansionist project, with the support of NATO and Saudi Arabia. In this regard, the Saudi-Israeli rapprochement is from Netanyahu’s viewpoint a means to expanding Israel’s spheres of influence in the Middle East as well as confronting Iran. Needless to day, the “Greater Israel” project is consistent with America’s imperial design.

    “Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates. According to Stephen Lendman, “A near-century ago, the World Zionist Organization’s plan for a Jewish state included:

    • historic Palestine;

    • South Lebanon up to Sidon and the Litani River;

    • Syria’s Golan Heights, Hauran Plain and Deraa; and

    • control of the Hijaz Railway from Deraa to Amman, Jordan as well as the Gulf of Aqaba.

    Some Zionists wanted more – land from the Nile in the West to the Euphrates in the East, comprising Palestine, Lebanon, Western Syria and Southern Turkey.”

    The Zionist project supports the Jewish settlement movement. More broadly it involves a policy of excluding Palestinians from Palestine leading to the eventual annexation of both the West Bank and Gaza to the State of Israel.

    Greater Israel would create a number of proxy States. It would include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. (See map).

    According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya in a 2011 Global Research article, The Yinon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East:

    “[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.

    Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yinon Plan discusses.

    The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.

    Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.

    “The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1)become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation… This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)

    Viewed in this context, the war on Syria and Iraq is part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion.

    In this regard, the defeat of US sponsored terrorists (ISIS, Al Nusra) by Syrian Forces with the support of Russia, Iran and Hizbollah constitute a significant setback for Israel.

    Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, September 06, 2015, updated September 18, 2018

    The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
    Translated and edited by

    Israel Shahak

    The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947)

    In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”

    Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”

    from

    Oded Yinon’s

    “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”
    Published by the

    Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.

    Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982

    Special Document No. 1 (ISBN 0-937694-56-8)

    Table of Contents

    Publisher’s Note1

    The Association of Arab-American University Graduates finds it compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with Oded Yinon’s article which appeared in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Oded Yinon is an Israeli journalist and was formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel. To our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed and unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East. Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the “vision” for the entire Middle East of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Begin, Sharon and Eitan. Its importance, hence, lies not in its historical value but in the nightmare which it presents.

    2

    The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.

    3

    This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication, Israel’s Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach’s study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.

    4

    The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Oded Yinon in his essay, “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980’s,” talks about “far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967” that are created by the “very stormy situation [that] surrounds Israel.”

    5

    The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very much an active policy, but is pursued more forcefully in times of conflict, such as in the 1947-1948 war and in the 1967 war. An appendix entitled “Israel Talks of a New Exodus” is included in this publication to demonstrate past Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides the main Zionist document we present, other Zionist planning for the de-Palestinization of Palestine.

    6

    It is clear from the Kivunim document, published in February, 1982, that the “far-reaching opportunities” of which Zionist strategists have been thinking are the same “opportunities” of which they are trying to convince the world and which they claim were generated by their June, 1982 invasion. It is also clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target since their viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or later.

    7

    Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy, unfortunately, suffers from ambiguity and incoherence. There is no indication that Arab strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead, they react with incredulity and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle East is not taken seriously Arab reaction to any future siege of other Arab capitals will be the same.

    Khalil Nakhleh

    July 23, 1982

    Continue: https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. khansaheeb

    khansaheeb SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,009
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Ratings:
    +2 / 6,417 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    It's not going very well though , the plan came to a halt in Lebanon , Iraq and now Syria.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  3. Ceylal

    Ceylal ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,024
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 7,645 / -14
    Country:
    Algeria
    Location:
    United States
    It will, just give it time for those Arab states to put the right bent over rulers in place and Israel will be free sailing from the Suez to the Euphrates.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. Solomon2

    Solomon2 BANNED

    Messages:
    19,426
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Ratings:
    +14 / 9,886 / -51
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    And then all will be quiet on the Morocco-Libya border!
     
  5. Ceylal

    Ceylal ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,024
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 7,645 / -14
    Country:
    Algeria
    Location:
    United States
    Morocco doesn’t have a border with Lybia.....And North Africa are not Arabs, they are not plywood like..
     
  6. Solomon2

    Solomon2 BANNED

    Messages:
    19,426
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Ratings:
    +14 / 9,886 / -51
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Not today. There's just the pesky obstacle of what's in between them to deal with, right?
     
  7. RedRock

    RedRock FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    97
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 83 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    The country (Iran) that hates the Israelis the most, is in fact helping them achieve their goal. Bravo Iran Bravo. When you know your brother (Arabs-Saudi) is a hot headed fool who loves control/influence in its neighborhood; what do you do?

    Do you go against him gun blazing and start to reduce your own brother’s influence?

    Or do you sit with him and completely outright refuse to go against him physically? This is the way you should have gone about it. It would have showed your enemies that no matter what happens, he is my brother and I will sit and talk to him but never ever raise arms against him. Eventually your misguided brother will also realize their mistake and start to feel less threatened by you and come to the conclusion that you are not going to physically harm him and therefore never chose sides with your enemies.

    Now you can go on about how Iran has tried to do exactly that and talk about the Iraq war and all, but the fact remains, it was always you that had to act like the elder brother and teach the Saudis on how to go about gaining influence and how you are not against it. They are after all new comers and it should not have bothered you if they started gaining influence in their immediate neighborhood. Also, you always knew the Saudis would never have attacked Iran by themselves and would always need outside help. You basically pushed them towards that outside help but interfering in Yemen and Syria and Iraq. You should have just ignored them and let them go about doing whatever they wanted or then helped them. It should not have bothered you!!!

    But, then again, I don’t blame you; Iranians are proud people who will never forget the Persian Empire and are dying to see the resurrection of that, or something on the lines of that. Alas that is where the problem is, both don’t want to give up, both want the same and your enemies know it and are playing you both. Until one of you realizes this and stops pushing against the other it will only end up in chaos, which is the way it is heading.

    And the Saudis should not act too chilled out; who do you think they will come for eventually when everyone else is taken care off?
     
  8. Ceylal

    Ceylal ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,024
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 7,645 / -14
    Country:
    Algeria
    Location:
    United States
    Who’s the pesky?
    Israel has to graft a pair of bionic balls to attack anything west of Egypt...since la last they had, they were delivered to them crude in their lap...I doubt that they have forgotten the shalake they received from the descendants of Shashnaq...