What's new

The world's most advanced and effective short range surface to air missile defense system HQ-17AE

beijingwalker

BANNED
Nov 4, 2011
46,977
-11
91,222
Country
China
Location
China
Where is India???
微信图片_20210823003240.png

This means to copy. However, your copies are too BS. You copied Su 33 and made a junk like J15, you copied Su 27 and made a junk like J11 which was badly humiliated tiny Gripen C.
Everyone copies everyone, this is how the world develops, US also copied many stuff from other countries before. I m asking what "high tech stuff‘’ you claimed that your Indians focus on, can you be more specific? I like to know where Indians stand to ridicule others.
 

Thorough Pro

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 23, 2008
13,228
-21
12,991
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
What about ripoff of German rocket designs?

no, the crotale reverse engineered ripoff is not the most advanced short range air defense system. lol
Then why do you forces start crapping in their pants when Chinese invade and take over your territory with their "crap" weapons?

Whatever China has now a days is most advance though world consider it a crap.
 

White and Green with M/S

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 29, 2020
4,265
-1
2,179
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States

Pandora

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 15, 2013
7,656
7
12,108
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
It is good system but jury is still out on it being the best. Chinese SAMs are very bulky and less maneuverable but cost effective. US and west still have the best air defense solutions but china will catch up in a decade or so.
 

MajesticPug

FULL MEMBER
Jan 29, 2021
412
-8
599
Country
China
Location
United States
It is good system but jury is still out on it being the best. Chinese SAMs are very bulky and less maneuverable but cost effective. US and west still have the best air defense solutions but china will catch up in a decade or so.

Like a decade ago, Turkey openly invited Chinese, European, and American SAM makers submit bid proposal and tested the systems from said countries. Chinese HQ-9 beats the European and American systems in both combat and cost effectiveness. HQ-9 hit 9 out of 9. Turkey wanted to buy the Chinese SAM until US threatened Turkey with all sorts of craziness (sanctions, ya know and what else?) That was the only competion of the modern Chinese SAM against Western systems. Since, the HQ-9 has evolved HQ-9A and HQ-9B. If those tests were any telling, today's Chinese SAMs are on par or better in some areas than their Western counterparts.
 

Abid123

FULL MEMBER
Jan 1, 2021
1,454
-4
1,996
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
"The HQ-17 is designed to keep up with mechanized troops like tank battalions to provide air cover on the move, as well as protect military sites".

Pakistan should consider buying lots of them.
 

Kaleem.61

FULL MEMBER
Mar 5, 2019
404
0
261
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
But they claim they focus on "high tech" stuff and that's why they don't bother to produce their own rifles...

Secrete dude!!! But one of them is 5 rupy coin " 5 upy wala sikka"

Tejas success story 😂

I remember an Indian asking: can tejas (auto rickshaw) defeat F22 Raptor. And one replied: yes, it can!!!😭😭😭
It's so simple to understand their mentality!
 
Last edited:

Pandora

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 15, 2013
7,656
7
12,108
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Like a decade ago, Turkey openly invited Chinese, European, and American SAM makers submit bid proposal and tested the systems from said countries. Chinese HQ-9 beats the European and American systems in both combat and cost effectiveness. HQ-9 hit 9 out of 9. Turkey wanted to buy the Chinese SAM until US threatened Turkey with all sorts of craziness (sanctions, ya know and what else?) That was the only competion of the modern Chinese SAM against Western systems. Since, the HQ-9 has evolved HQ-9A and HQ-9B. If those tests were any telling, today's Chinese SAMs are on par or better in some areas than their Western counterparts.

Competency of their systems is not in question. There is no question about it that Chinese systems are way bulkier even if their performance is same says EU or US counterparts. One example would be our induction of CAMMER and HQ 16 both are almost similar but CAMMER can be quad packed in same dimensions as one HQ16. It doesn't make it less competent but technological difference is visible.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom