• Saturday, November 17, 2018

The US Navy Just Took Delivery of What Could Be the Most Stealth Submarine Ever

Discussion in 'Naval Warfare' started by F-22Raptor, Sep 28, 2018.

  1. F-22Raptor

    F-22Raptor SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,900
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2014
    Ratings:
    +2 / 5,586 / -1
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    The United States Navy has taken delivery of what will eventually become USS South Dakota (SSN 790), the service’s seventeenth Virginia-class submarine. The Block III Virginia-class attack boat will be commissioned into service early in 2019.

    "South Dakota's delivery is an important milestone," Capt. Chris Hanson, Naval Sea Systems Command’s Virginia Class Program manager, said in a statement on September 24 when the service took delivery of the vessel. "It marks the penultimate Block III delivery and will be a vital asset in the hands of the fleet."

    What Hanson did not say was that South Dakota is no ordinary Virginia-class submarine. The vessel is the lead vessel for the Navy’s Acoustic Superiority Program.

    “This is our response to the continued improvement in our peer competitors’ submarine quality,” Rear Adm. Michael Jabaley, the Navy’s then program executive officer for submarines, said on July 8, 2016, the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The Russians with the production of the Severodvinsk SSGN took a significant step forward in their acoustic ability. We want to maintain pace ahead of that. We never want to reach acoustic parity, we always want to be better than anything any other country is putting out there in the submarine domain.”

    During her one-year post-shakedown availability (PSA) in later this year, South Dakota is expected to receive some fairly significant modifications from the baseline Virginia-class submarine that are expected to be tested at sea starting in 2019 and running through 2020.

    The modifications include new acoustical hull coatings, a series of machinery improvements inside the hull and the addition of two new large vertical sonar arrays—one on each side. The new sonar arrays “provide a significant advantage in the ability to detect other submarines before you yourself are in a position to be detected,” Jabaley said. Meanwhile, the machinery improvements also promise some “significant return on investment.”

    Additionally, South Dakota will receive a new enhanced propulsor design, which is being added during construction. However, if the new propulsor design proves to be less than successful, the Navy plans to replace it during the boat’s post-shakedown availability. “ South Dakota will have an improved enhanced hybrid propulsor that we have developed with DARPA,” Jabaley said. “It promises to present a significant acoustic advantage.”

    If the modifications trialed on South Dakota prove to be successful, then the technologies will be adopted for use on future Virginia-class boats as well as the future Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines. “The lessons we learn, we will learn from her [South Dakota], will then drive what we install on future ships including Ohio Replacement and what we back-fit on existing Virginias,” Jabaley said.

    The new quieting technology should more than mitigate any signature increase on the planned Block V Virginia-class submarines that will include the new Virginia Payload Module (VPM). The last 19 Virginia-class boats are all expected to carry the VPM missile tubes. After the last Virginia is built, the Navy expects to move onto a new attack submarine design.

    But the U.S. Navy hasn’t forgotten about emerging threats that some have argued could render submarines obsolete—but the service is not impressed by what it sees as overhyped fears. “We’re not there yet, we’re not really close—we’re working on that just as hard as or harder than anyone else,” Jabaley said. Nonetheless, the Navy has taken—and has always taken—a proactive view toward potential new threats.


    Rear Adm. Charles Richard, then the Navy’s director of undersea warfare, said at the same event that the service has run a Submarine Security Technology Program (SSPT) for both its ballistic missile and attack submarines for decades. The idea behind the effort is to anticipate potential future threats in advance and counter them. “SSTP has been around for a long time,” said Richard—who worked in that office 30 years ago. “It looks out into the future—as far as 25 or 30 years—based on the physics—so it’s physics based, intel informed—how could someone potentially attempt to detect a submarine and if we see something feasible, we start working on what we’re going to do to counter that.”

    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...at-could-be-most-stealth-submarine-ever-32117
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 7
  2. Peaceful Civilian

    Peaceful Civilian BANNED

    Messages:
    9,371
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Ratings:
    +8 / 10,251 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    images (16).jpeg
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. Beast

    Beast ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    13,411
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Ratings:
    +6 / 32,033 / -24
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    China
    The most stealthy sub is Chinese Type096 SSN. Next generation electric shaft less propulsion system.
     
  4. UKBengali

    UKBengali ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    11,093
    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Ratings:
    +8 / 13,236 / -2
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    United Kingdom

    You mean Type-095 SSN.
    Type-096 is a SSBN.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Dante80

    Dante80 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    313
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2018
    Ratings:
    +1 / 468 / -0
    Country:
    Greece
    Location:
    Greece
    The most stealthy submarine is definitely not a nuclear submarine. For obvious reasons.

    Having said that, it will be interesting to hear more about the hybrid propulsor the article talks about. The DARPA angle is intriguing, as well as the statement that the propulsor is experimental and it may not stay on the sub if it the trials don't go well. Up until now, it was historically chosen to have said low TRL experiments mounted on outstanding platforms, not new ones entering service.
     
  6. Oldman1

    Oldman1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,473
    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Ratings:
    +2 / 3,089 / -1
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    It be fascinating to see what the propulsor is, sadly it will be obviously classified and covered up prior to launch.
     
  7. BATMAN

    BATMAN ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,364
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Ratings:
    +12 / 14,104 / -16
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Electric propulsion. ;)
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. Oldman1

    Oldman1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,473
    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Ratings:
    +2 / 3,089 / -1
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    The new sonar arrays sounds interesting.