What's new

The U.S.-Pakistan Relationship Is on Life Support

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 24, 2008
18,395
13
24,596
Country
India
Location
India
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-us-pakistan-relationship-life-support-22149



In the days since President Trump came down hard on Pakistan in his speech outlining America’s new Afghanistan strategy, the reaction in Islamabad—and elsewhere across the country—has been predictably angry and defiant.

Pakistan’s National Security Committee, a group of top government and military officials, rejected Trump’s allegations—ones also made by many American leaders before him—that Pakistan provides sanctuaries to terrorists that destabilize Afghanistan and attack American troops. “To scapegoat Pakistan will not help in stabilizing Afghanistan,” the committee declared in a sharply worded statement. In a fiery interview with CNN, political opposition leader Imran Khan excoriated Trump for blaming Pakistan for U.S. struggles in Afghanistan and proclaimed that Trump’s criticism was “hurtful” and “humiliating” to all Pakistanis. Most recently, on August 30, Pakistan’s National Assembly passed a resolution lambasting Trump’s accusations as “hostile” and “threatening.”

Pakistan’s anger is now affecting high-level diplomacy. Islamabad asked Alice Wells, a top South Asia official at the State Department, to indefinitely postpone a planned visit to Pakistan. Pakistan’s foreign minister, who had been scheduled to visit Washington, will now be going to China, Russia and Turkey instead—three countries with close or newly growing ties with Pakistan. Speaking to Parliament on August 30, Pakistani foreign minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif called on the government to suspend all high-level bilateral visits with Washington.

Meanwhile, anti-American protests, all peaceful, have broken out across the country. From demonstrations in the remote tribal areas to a sit-in outside the U.S. consulate in the city of Lahore, people are expressing their anger toward Trump’s criticism and America’s policies more broadly.

On one level, Pakistan’s apoplectic reaction to Trump’s speech isn’t anything new. The U.S.-Pakistan relationship is fraught with mistrust and ill will. Most recently, in 2011 and 2012, the relationship was plunged into deep crisis thanks to a rapid-fire succession of events—including a CIA operative killing two Pakistani men on a busy city street in Lahore, U.S. Special Forces entering Pakistan to take out Osama bin Laden, and NATO aircraft accidentally killing two dozen Pakistani border troops. Back then, the rhetoric in both capitals was much angrier than it is now.

Additionally, in a nation as anti-American as Pakistan (in the pre-Trump era, as many as 92 percent of Pakistanis disapproved of U.S. leadership), top leaders are obliged to issue strong, public rebukes to sharp rhetoric like Trump’s. If you simply laugh or shrug off tough talk from the U.S. president, you risk becoming a political liability. So there’s a playing-to-the-gallery dimension inherent in the Pakistani response.

All this said, by no means is the Pakistani political class displaying manufactured sentiment. Far from it. There is genuine anger and apprehension, and for three major reasons that go beyond the simple fact that a U.S. president has put their country down in a big and threatening way—cause for anyone on the receiving end of such rhetoric, in any context, to be incensed.

First, Pakistani officialdom is well aware of Trump’s uncompromising, black-and-white position on terrorism: In effect, any terror group anywhere must be destroyed at all costs. Trump, more than his predecessors, is likely to order new and draconian measures meant to compel Pakistan to sever its ties to groups like the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani Network, which help Pakistan in a big way by keeping India—Pakistan’s bitter foe—at bay in Afghanistan. These possible measures could include expanding drone strikes into areas of the country, like Baluchistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Provinces, where militant leaders are harbored but have rarely been hit by drones; placing sanctions and travel bans on Pakistani officials with known ties to terror; launching broader air strikes on terrorist facilities; and even designating Pakistan as a state sponsor of terror if it fails to undertake a series of counterterrorism measures within a certain space of time. Trump administration officials have specifically singled out the first two measures as real possibilities.

Second, Pakistani leaders understand the increasingly anti-Pakistan mood in Washington. Such sentiment is apparent in the White House, at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and even within the community of think-tank analysts. The mood toward Pakistan may be friendlier at the State Department and USAID, but the influence of these agencies in shaping foreign policy, not to mention Pakistan policy, has taken a major hit. For all the unpopularity of Trump’s policies in Washington, the White House’s tougher line on Pakistan is likely to garner glowing bipartisan approval.

The third reason for Pakistan’s unhappiness boils down to the India factor. Trump generated banner headlines for putting Pakistan on notice, but his comments about India are more consequential—and problematic—for U.S.-Pakistan relations. Trump called on India to step up its game in Afghanistan—a country where New Delhi already plays a major role. India and Afghanistan signed a strategic partnership agreement in 2011, and this accord has translated to generous levels of Indian development assistance to Afghanistan—including funds allocated to dam construction and to Afghanistan’s new Parliament building.

But other than training that India offers to Afghan troops, the provision of military transport vehicles and other nonlethal hardware, and a one-time transfer of several Russia-made fighter helicopters to Afghanistan, New Delhi’s military aid to Afghanistan is modest—reflecting a high level of discretion on the part of India to avoid antagonizing Pakistan. When it comes to New Delhi’s warm relationship with Kabul, it’s the specter of deeper security relations that really spooks Pakistan.

Significantly, Trump did not ask India to scale up its military assistance to Afghanistan. Instead, his speech explicitly called on India to intensify its development and economic support there.

And yet, the simple fact that Trump asked India to do more in Afghanistan likely sent shock waves coursing through Islamabad and especially through Rawalpindi, home to the Pakistani military leadership. Pakistan often alleges that India uses Afghanistan as a base from which to orchestrate acts of meddling and sabotage in Pakistan—from supporting separatist rebels in Baluchistan to providing aid to terrorists like the Pakistani Taliban. For an American president, for the first time, to formally call on India to deepen its footprint on territory that Pakistan claims New Delhi already uses for anti-Pakistan activities—this is nothing short of a nightmare scenario for Pakistan.

From Pakistan’s perspective, now may seem to be an opportune time to lower the curtains on its relationship with America. Pakistan is stuck with an American president dead set on threatening, with likely support from key players in Washington, some of Pakistan’s most important national interests. Trump is poised to apply draconian new tactics to drive Pakistan away from nonstate assets that make Pakistan’s Indian enemy vulnerable, and he has already encouraged India to deepen its presence on Pakistan’s western flank. If Pakistan were to walk away from its partnership with the United States, it wouldn’t be wandering into the wilderness; it would be marching into the wide-open embrace of Beijing, which is cementing its already-deep partnership with Pakistan as it builds out the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

One might also conclude that America is prepared to walk away. The tough-on-terror Trump can’t be expected to have any patience for a country that takes billions of dollars from Washington while sheltering terrorists that kill Americans. The White House, by telegraphing its willingness to take escalatory policy steps that could ratchet up U.S.-Pakistan tensions to unprecedented levels, appears ready to risk the possibility of a rupture in relations in order to pursue its new Afghanistan strategy.

In truth, however, while both sides will be keen to take several big steps back, neither will want to walk away entirely. In fact, Trump, in his speech, extended an olive branch: “Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan.”

Both countries derive benefits from partnership, and the loss of these benefits could damage their interests. Now that Trump has formally endorsed an open-ended military commitment in Afghanistan, the strategic significance of NATO supply routes that snake through Pakistan has never been stronger. Islamabad would close these down in a heartbeat, as it did for a seven-month period in 2011 and 2012, if relations further deteriorate. Meanwhile, Pakistan, despite all it gets from Beijing, continues to value American military assistance and the prestige value of a relationship with the world’s sole superpower. Additionally, the supportive treatment that Pakistan receives from the International Monetary Fund—an institution where Washington holds great sway, and which has often helped Pakistan ease its economic woes—could be jeopardized in the event of a collapse in bilateral ties.

Ultimately, the trajectory of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship will depend on the types of pressure tactics implemented by the White House, and on the nature of Pakistan’s responses and retaliations. Another determinant of the relationship’s future is how much risk Washington and Islamabad will be willing to take on. The harsher the measures adapted by the United States, the greater chance that Pakistan could retaliate in dangerous ways. Additionally, the more that Pakistan resists changing its policies, the harsher the American tactics are likely to be.

Even at such an uncertain moment for U.S.-Pakistan relations, this much is true: The relationship may not shrivel up and die, but it’s dangerously low on oxygen. Dark days lie ahead.

Michael Kugelman is the Asia program deputy director and senior associate for South Asia at the Woodrow Wilson Center.

Image: Reuters
 

IceCold

PDF VETERAN
May 1, 2007
16,994
8
20,432
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
What if Pakistan starts shooting down US drones and anything that crosses over? If relations deteriorate to such an extent, how would Pakistan respond can be anybody's guess. We recently shot down Iranian drone over Balochistan. Yes US can sanction Pakistan, apply travel restrictions and even label us a terrorist state but is US willing to go to war with Pakistan if we start shooting down their drones and halt all supplies that go through Pakistan?
 

Hakikat ve Hikmet

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 14, 2015
13,319
17
34,624
Country
United States
Location
United States
Nobody wants their kins, even in a life support, to die!!!! Looks like reality is dawning on the US policymakers little early!!!! If they want to pursue their plan to be in Afganistan to keep a tap on OBOR, Pak help is inevitable....
 

Yerusalem 4880 Kms

FULL MEMBER
Jul 31, 2017
844
-8
653
Country
Pakistan
Location
Italy
What if Pakistan starts shooting down US drones and anything that crosses over? If relations deteriorate to such an extent, how would Pakistan respond can be anybody's guess. We recently shot down Iranian drone over Balochistan. Yes US can sanction Pakistan, apply travel restrictions and even label us a terrorist state but is US willing to go to war with Pakistan if we start shooting down their drones and halt all supplies that go through Pakistan?
Just stop NATO supplies and close the Afghan border and wait sipping a tea how long US can support Afghan affairs.
 

Sunan

FULL MEMBER
Jul 31, 2011
856
-6
711
Stop NATO supply and shoot down any drone or plane violate Pakistan air space.Signal must be loud and Clear.We will not tolerate any "Non Sence"!!
 

cloud4000

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 11, 2015
4,611
-5
4,460
Country
India
Location
United States
Regardless of the alarmist title of OP, Pakistan-US relations are not on life support. Far from it. Shooting down US drones or blocking supply lines seems a bit premature at this point and doing so would be a serious escalation of tensions. I doubt things have gotten that bad.

As long as US wants to be in Afghanistan, it will need Pakistan. Some arrangement will be made. Don't let the rhetoric on both sides fool you.
 

AyanRay

FULL MEMBER
Aug 29, 2009
1,329
-10
1,957
What if Pakistan starts shooting down US drones and anything that crosses over? If relations deteriorate to such an extent, how would Pakistan respond can be anybody's guess. We recently shot down Iranian drone over Balochistan. Yes US can sanction Pakistan, apply travel restrictions and even label us a terrorist state but is US willing to go to war with Pakistan if we start shooting down their drones and halt all supplies that go through Pakistan?
U tried once, shooting down a helicopter, lost 24 of yours. So be better prepared next time
 

countryman

BANNED
Jan 13, 2017
411
0
305
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
I think we'll figure things out for now and leave the fight for another day. I think best strategy will be to reject US aid as tangible step to reset Pakistan-US ties but continue our fight against terrorism. I think that is only culprit that is giving them upper hand to make us a scapegoat. Once we're on same page - let future decide where these ties goes.
 

IceCold

PDF VETERAN
May 1, 2007
16,994
8
20,432
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
U tried once, shooting down a helicopter, lost 24 of yours. So be better prepared next time
No we did not. Dont make facts out of your rear. Had we done that US would be using a complete different tone. The only thing we did was to close NATO supply and they were begging to open it.
 

TMA

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 7, 2015
4,426
4
2,805
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
What if Pakistan starts shooting down US drones and anything that crosses over? If relations deteriorate to such an extent, how would Pakistan respond can be anybody's guess. We recently shot down Iranian drone over Balochistan. Yes US can sanction Pakistan, apply travel restrictions and even label us a terrorist state but is US willing to go to war with Pakistan if we start shooting down their drones and halt all supplies that go through Pakistan?
Does Pakistan have the guts?
 

IceCold

PDF VETERAN
May 1, 2007
16,994
8
20,432
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Does Pakistan have the guts?
You mean government of Pakistan because is a state which is run by a government so as such Pakistan cannot have guts, its the government of Pakistan that needs to have guts and well No as far your question is concerned. The current government of Pakistan does not have guts.
 

mingle

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 4, 2015
5,087
2
3,667
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
It's US and Pak can work on Afghan issue neither India nor other country help Yanks on this matter .So revival of these relations r up to US Generals .
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom