• Thursday, February 27, 2020

The National Interest:Why China Is Winning the 5G War

Discussion in 'World Affairs' started by Dungeness, Feb 6, 2019.

  1. Dungeness

    Dungeness SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,014
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,997 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States
    February 5, 2019 Topic: Security Region: Asia Tags: Technology War Research Patent Laws 5g

    Why China Is Winning the 5G War

    If America wants to lead in 5G, then it must clear the path for strong competition among leading American technology companies.

    by Charles Duan

    There is little doubt today that American superiority in the next generation of mobile communications, commonly called 5G, is a matter of extraordinary national concern. There is also little doubt that China is a strong competitor, already having outspent the United States by $24 billion and planning $411 billion in 5G investment over the next decade. The Chinese government has also laid out multiple national plans for establishing the country as a leader in mobile technology, and the Chinese firm Huawei is poised to be the top smartphone manufacturer by 2020.

    And what are United States companies doing about this? Bickering over patents.

    For years, the leading American supplier of advanced mobile communications chips has been the San Diego-based Qualcomm. The company has been an innovator of mobile technology, but it has also been a remarkable innovator of convoluted legal strategies. As an ongoing Federal Trade Commission lawsuit alleges , Qualcomm has used its dominant position as a chip supplier and its extensive patent holdings to weave an intricate web of patent licensing across the mobile industry. The effect of that complex licensing scheme, the FTC claims, has been to force competitor chipmakers out of the market and to extract concessions and high patent royalties from smartphone and mobile-device makers.

    Qualcomm today faces only one major U.S. competitor—Intel, whose chips Apple recently started using instead of Qualcomm’s. Not surprisingly, Qualcomm has leveraged its patents to force a retaliatory investigation against Apple, the effect of which could be, as an administrative judge recently determined , to boot Intel out of the mobile-chip market and leave Qualcomm as a monopoly.

    It is hard to imagine that this infighting among Apple, Intel and Qualcomm is getting the United States very far in 5G, and it is harder to imagine that Qualcomm’s desired outcome would do so, either. The best path, instead, is the obvious one: allowing competition and expanding the number of firms working on 5G.

    Competition encourages companies to out-innovate each other in order to grab market share. Of particular importance to 5G, competition leads to better cybersecurity in products, making them less vulnerable to hacking or misuse.

    Competition is especially crucial when it comes to the technical standards that define how 5G works. These standards are the work of 3GPP, an international consortium of technology companies in the field. Chinese players such as Huawei and ZTE are major participants in 3GPP. Ensuring that 3GPP’s standards reflect American values requires having as many American companies at the negotiating table as possible—which is harder to achieve when those companies are trying to sue each other out of business.

    Certainly patents themselves, as rewards for new inventions, are a driver of innovation in areas such as 5G. The problem, though, is not the existence of a patent system but the ever-expanding power of the patent laws, which encourage companies to pour dollars into complex patent licensing and assertion schemes—as companies like Qualcomm have done—rather than to perform the hard work of building new technologies. When innovation in patent strategy is more profitable than actual innovation, we lose the race to 5G and other technologies.

    But don’t take my word for it. Multiple members of Congress , from both sides of the aisle, have denounced the use of patents to kick companies like Intel out of 5G development, predicting that such actions would “dampen the quality, innovation, competitive pricing, and in this case the preservation of a strong U.S. presence in the development of 5G and thus the national security of the United States.”

    Or look to what China itself is doing. The Chinese government is handing out rewards left and right to encourage technology research and development. Indeed, it grants subsidies and financial benefits (ranging from the ordinary to the imperfect to the bizarre) to encourage its citizens to file for patents. But while China specifically encourages filing for patents, it does little to encourage using them: Patent infringement awards in court are peanuts—often only five figures —and most Chinese patent owners drop their patents within five years of getting them. The message in China is clear: You will be rewarded for innovating, but not for quibbling over patents.

    The United States should take the same tack if it wants to match China in 5G. Ever-stronger patent rights encourage counterproductive disputes that are a drag on industry, a drag on research and development, and ultimately a drag on domestic competitiveness on the global stage. If America wants to lead in 5G, then it must clear the path for strong competition among leading American technology companies.

    Charles Duan is the Director of Technology and Innovation at the R Street Institute.

    https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-china-winning-5g-war-43347
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  2. Austin Powers

    Austin Powers BANNED

    Messages:
    13,369
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,640 / -9
    Country:
    Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    Because westerners got lazy. Chinese don't work hard. They work normal.

    IBM and Motorola used to be household names back in the 1980s and early 1990s. Guess what? Now they are simply wholly owned subsidiaries of Lenovo, which was a nobody back then.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. Hamartia Antidote

    Hamartia Antidote ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    18,396
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Ratings:
    +25 / 13,599 / -6
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    IBM is still a US company. They just sold their laptop business to Lenovo when they saw the writing on the wall with internet enabled smartphones.

    IBM didn’t follow the proprietary route in its hardware business...like Apple did. One saw its marketshare die quickly by companies like Dell while the other made enough to invest in other markets.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  4. Austin Powers

    Austin Powers BANNED

    Messages:
    13,369
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,640 / -9
    Country:
    Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    IBM has very little application these days. In supercomputers Lenovo is the top dog.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Dungeness

    Dungeness SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,014
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,997 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States
    Off topic, but check out this guy on YouTube, Nathan Rich. He is an American Jew living in China for more than 10 years, and he may provide a different prospective on China. Interesting channel.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. Azadkashmir

    Azadkashmir SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,802
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 6,399 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    suck usa dry and then move to new host welcome china, hmm fresh blood to drink like dracula.
     
  7. Han Patriot

    Han Patriot SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,146
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Ratings:
    +2 / 9,940 / -6
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Singapore
    China dominated the 5G patents. US only produce some telco chips, we can replace it with ARM based designs. Qualcomm is just milking their legacy patents, no real 5G innovation like Huawei. That's why US is shaking at the future domination of Huawei.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  8. Dungeness

    Dungeness SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,014
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,997 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States
    Trump in today's "State of Union" is demanding China to make "real structural change", so that US can enjoy technical advantages. It's like a mediocre student is asking the best student to slow down, so he can catch up. What a loser mentality!

    If you can't reach his height, pull his leg!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  9. Austin Powers

    Austin Powers BANNED

    Messages:
    13,369
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,640 / -9
    Country:
    Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    America wanted competition. And now they can't handle it. Gee. In 1945 when America had nukes and no one else did, they flat out refused to conquer the world without firing a bullet, instead they wanted competition. So much for that.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. Dungeness

    Dungeness SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,014
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,997 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States

    1945? Cute!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. Hamartia Antidote

    Hamartia Antidote ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    18,396
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Ratings:
    +25 / 13,599 / -6
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Actually he's an angry and confused ex-Scientologist who spent 7 years as a homeless drug-using streetperson



    The guy thinks youtube is specifically out to get HIM...a guy with 12 videos and a minimal amount of subscribers. He thinks everybody who watches his videos is going to click the like/dislike buttons or actually subscribe to it.

    These are some of the facts he should be aware of:

    https://merchdope.com/youtube-stats/
    • The total number of people who use YouTube – 1,300,000,000
    • Almost 5 billion videos are watched on Youtube every single day
    • 300 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute!
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2019
  12. Dungeness

    Dungeness SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,014
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,997 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States

    Yeah, he was a junkie and had troubled childhood. Nonetheless, he seems to be a intelligent dude, and I like the way he presents his point of views, sharp, concise and logical.

    If you could read the comments in Chinese, you wouldn't have even doubted that his number of subscribers has been deliberately manipulated. Some comments in Chinese are dedicated to record the changes of the number of his subscribers. I can personally testify this very "unusual phenomenon" in his YouTube channel.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Hamartia Antidote

    Hamartia Antidote ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    18,396
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Ratings:
    +25 / 13,599 / -6
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Yeah and his book on Amazon has 46 reviews all with 5 stars and all written in a span of two months. Funny that...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  14. Dungeness

    Dungeness SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,014
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,997 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States
    Conspiracy theorist? :partay:
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  15. Hamartia Antidote

    Hamartia Antidote ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    18,396
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Ratings:
    +25 / 13,599 / -6
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    No, the book came out in September 2018. So I guess he wrote it during his "10 years in China".
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2019