What's new

The History of Downgraded Vera-E Radar Purchase by PAF

Tps43

PROFESSIONAL
Apr 14, 2016
4,877
16
10,547
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Yes, im assuming you are asking when enemy aircraft Radar is switched off.

1. Radar Cross section detection through a Surveillance Radar using low frequencies or Track while Scan mode.

2. Intercepting/tracking VHF/UHF comm links and other data links. Voice communication is mostly through VHF or UHF in RF spectrum between pilot and ATC/Command. The monitoring system has to be robust in tracking even short comm/data message bursts.

3. Detecting IR signature of the aircraft using IRST/FLIR.

View attachment 553225




True, seen that in SCO Chinese comm systems deployed in north of Pakistan. Another reason why USA tactical radios were preferred before 786 series of PA radios were provided by NRTC.


Haan emotional ho k share kar dena. nokri se tu bari jaldi farigh honay wala hay in harkaat ki waja se. chup nai reh sakta tu.


You are always spot on:tup:
Hahahah nokri piyari hai
 

SQ8

ADVISORS
Mar 28, 2009
36,009
428
76,980
Country
United States
Location
United States
Yes, im assuming you are asking when enemy aircraft Radar is switched off.

1. Radar Cross section detection through a Surveillance Radar using low frequencies or Track while Scan mode.

2. Intercepting/tracking VHF/UHF comm links and other data links. Voice communication is mostly through VHF or UHF in RF spectrum between pilot and ATC/Command. The monitoring system has to be robust in tracking even short comm/data message bursts.

3. Detecting IR signature of the aircraft using IRST/FLIR.

View attachment 553225




True, seen that in SCO Chinese comm systems deployed in north of Pakistan. Another reason why USA tactical radios were preferred before 786 series of PA radios were provided by NRTC.


Haan emotional ho k share kar dena. nokri se tu bari jaldi farigh honay wala hay in harkaat ki waja se. chup nai reh sakta tu.


You are always spot on:tup:
Chinese radios were pieces of crap(no offense to the downgrading suppliers). Aselsan(NOT NRTC, my hand is in that) 9661 series radios performed better than Harris in the field.
A lot of work went into encryption and voice/data compression.
 

Sine Nomine

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 19, 2014
10,053
23
12,669
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Chinese radios were pieces of crap(no offense to the downgrading suppliers). Aselsan(NOT NRTC, my hand is in that) 9661 series radios performed better than Harris in the field.
A lot of work went into encryption and voice/data compression.
Kudos Sir,
Is NRTC Govt owned?
 

Comrade

FULL MEMBER
Feb 6, 2006
146
0
135
if the enemy aircraft doesnt emit signal, would this device detect it or not? thanks.
No it'll not detect it as its passive and needs to process incoming signals through passive reception and top secret software and hardware based DSP digital signal processing units

The fact is that Pakistan lost a chance to get a passive radar system that was 100% capable of detecting stealth flying objects. The fact that US purchased the firm to prevent such systems into getting in the hands of hostile countries is a testimony that it was a very capable system
1. Impossible to detect its presence as it is not emitting an EM waves.
2. It could have added a formidable defensive capacity to Paks air defense and the situations like the Abotabad Osama raids could have been detected earlier where Pakistan failed miserably and they were just few miles away from all the country's assets nuclear and conventional ..
3. Its a loss that needs to mourn and there never ever be an alternative to it unless researched and developed by our own experts and engineers..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom