What's new

The Future of China’s Amphibious Assault Fleet,the power of china's navy

beijingwalker

BANNED
Nov 4, 2011
36,940
2
70,807
Country
China
Location
China
The Future of China’s Amphibious Assault Fleet,the power of china's navy

The Chinese Navy is expanding at an incredible pace, rapidly outstripping almost all other navies. A year ago it had no amphibious assault carriers (termed landing helicopter docks). These large helicopter carriers are often the most powerful ships in many navies,The rapid construction of Chinese Navy (PLAN) warships is hard to keep up with. China’s new Assault Carriers are known as the Type-075 LHD. They have already launched two in the past year. And now images have emerged on Chinese-language social media that, perhaps unwittingly, reveal yet another.


 

Tai Hai Chen

BANNED
Oct 15, 2017
17,139
-12
7,669
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
The tonnage of Imperial Japanese Navy ships at the bed of Pacific Ocean exceeds the current size of the Chinese Navy
Japan is tiny compared to China. In WW2 Japanese population was 70 million. China population 1400 million. Also, Japanese warships don't have AESA the way Chinese carriers and destroyers do. So it's not only tonnage that is important. It's technology that matter. Comprende?
 

Stryker1982

FULL MEMBER
Oct 5, 2016
1,283
0
1,745
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Japan is tiny compared to China. In WW2 Japanese population was 70 million. China population 1400 million. Also, Japanese warships don't have AESA the way Chinese carriers and destroyers do. So it's not only tonnage that is important. It's technology that matter. Comprende?
No shit they didn't have AESA, the point was that the Japanese navy was 2nd to none in the World even superior to Britain but were defeated by the US regardless.
 

beijingwalker

BANNED
Nov 4, 2011
36,940
2
70,807
Country
China
Location
China
No shit they didn't have AESA, the point was that the Japanese navy was 2nd to none in the World even superior to Britain but were defeated by the US regardless.
Back then US was the runaway leader in heavy industries and manufacturing which enabled US to fast outbuild and outproduce any countries in anything, but it is no longer the case now for US.
 

nahtanbob

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 24, 2018
7,655
-35
2,525
Country
United States
Location
United States
Japan is tiny compared to China. In WW2 Japanese population was 70 million. China population 1400 million. Also, Japanese warships don't have AESA the way Chinese carriers and destroyers do. So it's not only tonnage that is important. It's technology that matter. Comprende?
technology works both ways - US Navy is tad more advanced than the force that beat the IJN
 

Beast

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 5, 2011
22,753
-37
53,709
Country
China
Location
China
No shit they didn't have AESA, the point was that the Japanese navy was 2nd to none in the World even superior to Britain but were defeated by the US regardless.
When u break the code of enemy and know before hand where they going to strike and position their main forces. Everything works so easy even you are under dog.

The american carrier dive bomber like dauntless are also much superior than Japanese dive bomber of the type 99 aichi.

Dauntless can carry 450kg bomb and a single hit can be devastating compare to Japanese one (250kg) which need multiple hit to sink a carrier.
 

Han Patriot

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 23, 2011
10,561
-23
16,209
Country
China
Location
Singapore
No shit they didn't have AESA, the point was that the Japanese navy was 2nd to none in the World even superior to Britain but were defeated by the US regardless.
You are comparing 1940s Japan to 2020 China with nukes with bigger industrial capacity. Japan lost because they didn't have the population nor industrial capacity.
 

Tai Hai Chen

BANNED
Oct 15, 2017
17,139
-12
7,669
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
technology works both ways - US Navy is tad more advanced than the force that beat the IJN
Yes but not more advanced than China. Chinese carriers are equipped with AESA. To date only 1 US carrier a Ford class has AESA. Nimitz still has old radar from 70s.
No shit they didn't have AESA, the point was that the Japanese navy was 2nd to none in the World even superior to Britain but were defeated by the US regardless.
Japanese navy back in the 30s and 40s was nothing. It lacked new technologies of the day such as radar. US and Britain all had radar on their ships which gave them tech advantage over Japan.
 

nahtanbob

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 24, 2018
7,655
-35
2,525
Country
United States
Location
United States
Yes but not more advanced than China. Chinese carriers are equipped with AESA. To date only 1 US carrier a Ford class has AESA. Nimitz still has old radar from 70s.


Japanese navy back in the 30s and 40s was nothing. It lacked new technologies of the day such as radar. US and Britain all had radar on their ships which gave them tech advantage over Japan.
The world runs on American designed silicon - Qualcomm, Intel, Nvidia, AMD
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom